Re: Mismatch between /usr/include/linux and the kernel

2003-01-14 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 14 January 2003 09:31 am, David Betz wrote: > I just installed RedHat 8.0 including the kernel development package > and used it to build a simple kernel module. When I tried to load the > kernel module I got an error saying there was a vers

Re: Mismatch between /usr/include/linux and the kernel

2003-01-14 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:37:56 -0600, Rigler, S C (Steve) wrote: > Along the same subject, I have had problems compiling some software > with/usr/include/linux as provided (RH7.2 - RH8.0) distros. > > An example is when compiling the linux-atm sources.

Re: Mismatch between /usr/include/linux and the kernel

2003-01-14 Thread David Betz
Yes, that helps. Thanks very much! David On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 10:35 AM, Matthews, John wrote: The headers from kernel 2.4.9-9 were most likley used when glibc was compiled. This is the correct way of doing things and you should not alter your /usr/include/linux link. If your comp

RE: Mismatch between /usr/include/linux and the kernel

2003-01-14 Thread Rigler, S C (Steve)
EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Mismatch between /usr/include/linux and the kernel The headers from kernel 2.4.9-9 were most likley used when glibc was compiled. This is the correct way of doing things and you should not alter your /usr/include/linux link. If your compiling your own kernel

RE: Mismatch between /usr/include/linux and the kernel

2003-01-14 Thread Matthews, John
The headers from kernel 2.4.9-9 were most likley used when glibc was compiled. This is the correct way of doing things and you should not alter your /usr/include/linux link. If your compiling your own kernel module you should not be using the header files from /usr/include/linux, but instead spec