Re: Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Jeff Kinz
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:55:25PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:44:59PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > > Okay, thanks! Next question: I ran that find command from the root > > directory, and found thirty executables with that suid bit set. Some I > > can tell need it (s

Re: Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Ed Greshko
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 08:16, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > On many of the INSTALL and README documents that come with source > tarballs, they talk about compiling with 'make', then running 'make > install' as root. I was scanning some security documents the other day, > and something just hit me: S

Re: Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:44:59PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > Okay, thanks! Next question: I ran that find command from the root > directory, and found thirty executables with that suid bit set. Some I > can tell need it (sudo, suexec), some I think I can just delete (rlogin, > rsh, rcp),

Re: Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Jeff Kinz
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:16:30PM -0500, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > uestion, but I got to thinking... > > On many of the INSTALL and README documents that come with source > tarballs, they talk about compiling with 'make', then running 'make > install' as root. I was scanning some security docum

Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
Okay, this may be a stupid question, but I got to thinking... On many of the INSTALL and README documents that come with source tarballs, they talk about compiling with 'make', then running 'make install' as root. I was scanning some security documents the other day, and something just hit me: S

Re: Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Ed Wilts
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:02:15PM -0400, Jeff Kinz wrote: > > I run a regular rpmverify script to automatically go through every > > installed package and e-mail a report. It's much less management than > > tripwire (although not quite as effective). Let me know if you want the > > script. > >

Re: Question about security and compiling binaries...

2003-08-14 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> > and something just hit me: Somewhere in those documents they were > > talking about looking for files that had the suid bit set and that were > > owned by root. > > > > Now, I usually put my source files in /usr/local/src, so that I have one > > place to put them. And I su to root before I d