Alan,
Thanks! That works!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Alan Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postfix question
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Mike Koponick wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had
Mike Koponick wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize
> in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject.
>
> I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix
> server and use it as a relay. This is do
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Mike Koponick wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize
> in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject.
>
> I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix
>
I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize
in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject.
I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix
server and use it as a relay. This is done for visiting people that
cannot sendmail to
I was just wondering, whats the best way to go about SMTP-AUTH on a
postfix 1.1.12 server? I see RH comes with saslauth and postfix which I
have setup almost identically to the howto on RH's site. (and everything
these seems to be working fine)
So I tried to get SMTP-AUTH working with cyrus
Brett Franck wrote:
Postfix 2.0 is the MTA. How can I allow a host of "63.111.163.37: 450
Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname" to be allowed to
transfer mail IN to my server but still use the reject_unknown_hostname
recipient restriction?
Looks like you should create an
All,
I have my Postfix locked down pretty tight for
spam, and have come across a small problemI have a host that I want to
receive mail from but the "hostname is not found". Here's a piece of my
Postfix Main.cf(applicable)
smtpd_helo_required =
yesstrict_r
When sending mail to other domains, the maillog will
show messages " postfix/qmgr[15502]: E3917138055:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=1,
status=deferred (deferred transport)"
thanks for any help.
anton
--- Edward Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Anton
Anton NG wrote:
Hi all,
Help!!!
My postfix is running well on local domain and can
receive incomming mail very good. It needs hours to
send outgoing mail.
Does anyone know how to increase the speed postfix
sends outgoing mail.I read it somewhere before, but
can't seem to find it agai
Hi all,
Help!!!
My postfix is running well on local domain and can
receive incomming mail very good. It needs hours to
send outgoing mail.
Does anyone know how to increase the speed postfix
sends outgoing mail.I read it somewhere before, but
can't seem to find it again now.
Thank'
Hi,
I have just setup a postfix server with MailScanner
that's running well on Rh 9 and can receive e-mail
fast enough. But it takes hours to send mail to other
domains.
does anyone get idea How to increase the speed postfix
sends outgoing mail?
thank&#x
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: Redhat 8.0 and Postfix 2.X
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Brett Franck wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Sorry if this
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Brett Franck wrote:
> All,
>
> Sorry if this is not the right list for this question, if it is, please re-direct me
> to the right list.
>
> I have been using Postfix 1.1 for over a year, but wanted some of the functionality
> of Postfix 2.0, after
All,
Sorry if this is not the right list for this
question, if it is, please re-direct me to the right list.
I have been using Postfix 1.1 for over a year, but
wanted some of the functionality of Postfix 2.0, after using RPM install, I
found that Postfix 2.0 doesn't support SASL
- Original Message -
From: "David Barkman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:08 PM
Subject: Sendmail or Postfix
> Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
> opinions on mail serve
t; frightening. I have the book RH Linux Internet Server and it walks
> through setting up Postfix. It seems to have enough features to get
> me started while remaining not too complex.
One of the statements I've seen recently is that if you're familiar with
sendmail, or have a
Hi all,
Help!!!
I want to secure my my postfix mail server, only
clients from mynetwork can relay through my mail
server.
Any other advice on this process would be appreciated.
Thank's
Anton
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved pr
Hi, I'm building a small web server on RH 9 and are looking for some
opinions on mail servers.
I'm sure Sendmail will have all the features I could ever dream of needing,
but it's complexity
is a bit frightening. I have the book RH Linux Internet Server and it walks
through set
Hi all,
I have problem sending mail from my postfix linux with
MailScanner+ClamAv. It's very slow when sending to
other
e-mail server like mail.yahoo.com & if recipient more
than one e-mail addresses i will receive "Undeliver
Message..." from postfix, eventhough the mails
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, R.E. wrote:
> i managed to relay the smtp server...but i still get this message
> -
>
> This is the Postfix program at host linuxbox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
>
> be
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, R.E. wrote:
> i managed to relay the smtp server...but i still get this message
> -
>
> This is the Postfix program at host linuxbox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
>
> be
i managed to relay the smtp server...but i still get this message
-
This is the Postfix program at host linuxbox.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assis
> how do i configure postfix to use another smtp server for out going mail?
Look in your /etc/postfix/main.cf file, you should see a relayhost line.
Mine looks like:
relayhost = smtp.central.cox.net
Ben
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.
how do i configure postfix to use another smtp server for out going mail?
-rene
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
>
> Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
Um...sort of.
Look in /etc/postfix/aliases. There is a line that by default reads
root:postfix
The comment specifica
Check to see what the permissions are on /var/spool/mail/postfix.
Though, really, you should probably have 'postfix' aliased to a real user.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Peter Skensved wrote:
> I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
> somethi
I'm considering migrating from sendmail to postfix but I have run into
something which looks like a permission problem. I followed the directions
in the RedHat postfix HOWTO, stopped sendmail, started postfix and sent
mail to the machine. However, it bounces telling me that :
* Rick Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-12 08:20]:
> On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 19:55, Marc Adler wrote:
> > * Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 16:04]:
> > > * Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 15:44]:
> >
> > > my ISP's nameservers have changed. Is there any way to find out what
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 19:55, Marc Adler wrote:
> * Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 16:04]:
> > * Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 15:44]:
>
> > my ISP's nameservers have changed. Is there any way to find out what the
> > new ones are?
>
> Alright, that was a stupid question.
Sorry, I replied to your first message before I finished looking
through
the list.
Ignore my other post.
it's still eary
Leonard
--
Leonard W. Miller
United Defense, L.P.
Learn to survive until you can gain control.
Automatically inserted lawyer supplied confidentiality blurb follow
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Marc Adler
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:47 AM
> To: Red Hat Mailing List
> Subject: URGENT: postfix fails, no internet connection
>
>
> This morning I turned on m
* Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 16:04]:
> * Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 15:44]:
> my ISP's nameservers have changed. Is there any way to find out what the
> new ones are?
Alright, that was a stupid question. I called the tech service people
and they told me to do an 'i
* Marc Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-11 15:44]:
>
>
> > OK, so networking is OK. Your IP address is in private space, so I
> > assume you have some sort of router/firewall/gateway to the internet.
> > Is that correct? Try this:
> >
> >ping www.yahoo.com
>
> No good.
>
> >
> > then
>
(B
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> On Behalf Of Rick Warner
(B> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:07 AM
(B> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Subject: RE: URGENT: postfix fails, no internet connection
(B>
(B>
(
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BBehalf Of Marc Adler
(BSent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:53 PM
(BTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSubject: RE: URGENT: postfix fails, no internet connection
(B
(B
(B
(B
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B>
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 17:53, Marc Adler wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Rick Warner
> > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:30 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subje
(B
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> On Behalf Of Rick Warner
(B> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:30 AM
(B> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Subject: RE: URGENT: postfix fails, no internet connection
(B>
(B>
(
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 17:16, Marc Adler wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Marc Adler
> > Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:47 AM
> > To: Red Hat Mailing List
> > Subject: URG
(B
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> On Behalf Of Marc Adler
(B> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:47 AM
(B> To: Red Hat Mailing List
(B> Subject: URGENT: postfix fails, no internet connection
(B>
(B>
(B&g
This morning I turned on my RH9 system and it paused around 30 seconds when
(Bstarting up NFS and then paused at postfix and failed, giving me a message
(Bsaying:
(B
(BStarting postfix: postalias: fatal: config variable inet_interfaces: host
(Bnot found: localhost
(B
(BMy other unit is a
e SASL/TLS. Skip to the
> > section labled "Building from Source"
> >
> > NOTE: These instructions are based on using the postfix source RPM which can
> > also found at the same website.
>
> I was trying to use this source RPM, and misunderstood the sasl variable
Cowles, Steve wrote:
I followed the excellent instructions at
http://postfix.wl0.org/en/building-rpms to enable SASL/TLS. Skip to the
section labled "Building from Source"
NOTE: These instructions are based on using the postfix source RPM which can
also found at the same website.
I was
Graham Leggett wrote:
> Keith Morse wrote:
>
>> Graham, if you don't get a decent response here I'd suggest that you
>> check the postfix users list archives. I know this has been
>> discussed before on that list.
>>
>>
>> http://www.post
Keith Morse wrote:
Graham, if you don't get a decent response here I'd suggest that you
check the postfix users list archives. I know this has been discussed
before on that list.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
After a whole lot of digging, the problem seems to be this:
Redhat
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to use Postfix with SASL support as provided by Redhat v9:
>
> postfix-1.1.12-1
> cyrus-sasl-2.1.10-4
>
> According to the package dependancies, postfix has been compiled to
> support SASL, but
> Hello all,
>
> Running RH 9 with Postfix and have been very happy with the results. I
also
> installed Squirrelmail via the cd and as I run through the various config
> info it appears that the default setup is for Sendmail.
> I was wondering if anyone else has Squirrelmail u
Hi all,
I am trying to use Postfix with SASL support as provided by Redhat v9:
postfix-1.1.12-1
cyrus-sasl-2.1.10-4
According to the package dependancies, postfix has been compiled to
support SASL, but having configured it I get access denied to my
attempts at smtp auth. I am also not seeing
great and thanks I'm on it
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Dixon
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 8:41 PM
To: Red Hat Mailing List
Subject: Re: Postfix and ntsysv question
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 21:31, Tim Lamberth wrote:
&g
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 21:31, Tim Lamberth wrote:
> Did a new install of Redhat 9 and Postfix after the loss of my scsi drive
> and controller. When I run ntsysv to set Postfix to run at startup it is not
> listed. Any ideas as to why it would be missing in the list?
If there is an init s
Did a new install of Redhat 9 and Postfix after the loss of my scsi drive
and controller. When I run ntsysv to set Postfix to run at startup it is not
listed. Any ideas as to why it would be missing in the list?
Thanks,
Tim
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Steve,
Thanks so much...that is exactly the information I needed.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cowles, Steve
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 8:46 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: RH 9 Postfix and Squirrelm
Tim Lamberth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Running RH 9 with Postfix and have been very happy with the results.
> I also installed Squirrelmail via the cd and as I run through the
> various config info it appears that the default setup is for Sendmail.
> I was wondering if anyone els
Hello all,
Running RH 9 with Postfix and have been very happy with the results. I also
installed Squirrelmail via the cd and as I run through the various config
info it appears that the default setup is for Sendmail.
I was wondering if anyone else has Squirrelmail up had running with Postfix
> > One question I have that came out of this discussion is
> why are systems
> > behind routers safer? What kind of security does a
router provide?
>
> A router by itself does not provide any inherent
security. However:
>
> A standard router, such as a cisco 2501, can do port
> blocking, wh
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:05:52AM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
> behind routers safer?
They aren't. They are just simpler to admin. So if you don't know what
you are doing, or don't have the time to tend to business, they can
> One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
> behind routers safer? What kind of security does a router provide?
A router by itself does not provide any inherent security. However:
A standard router, such as a cisco 2501, can do port blocking, which can add
some sec
One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
behind routers safer? What kind of security does a router provide?
By the way, the first line in /etc/resolv.conf has not been added back
in, and my system is back to normal. Thanks!
--
Marc Adler
--
redhat-list mailing l
> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 10:26, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > However, the local caching nameserver could be an appropriate solution
> > > iff the ISP is continuously negligent of DNS service problems and Marc
> > > invests the time to learn how to properly secure such a service.
> >
> > As a perso
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 10:26, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > However, the local caching nameserver could be an appropriate solution
> > iff the ISP is continuously negligent of DNS service problems and Marc
> > invests the time to learn how to properly secure such a service.
>
> As a person who is st
> However, the local caching nameserver could be an appropriate solution
> iff the ISP is continuously negligent of DNS service problems and Marc
> invests the time to learn how to properly secure such a service.
As a person who is standing up a linux DNS (yes, it's necessary), I just
want to doub
Check
/etc/resolv.conf
/etc/nsswitch.conf
Check out that you are not doning nis lookups or something like that.
The problem is related with name resolution.
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Marc Adler wrote:
> I switched my mail transfer agent to postfix from sendmail about a month
> ago and it worke
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:26, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:11, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> >
> > Your response speaks for itself. In this age of worms and script
> > kiddies, we can't afford to propogate the notion that the Internet is
> > some big sandbox for everyone to play in. If y
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:11, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> Your response speaks for itself. In this age of worms and script
> kiddies, we can't afford to propogate the notion that the Internet is
> some big sandbox for everyone to play in. If you're going to provide a
> public service, you need to be
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:03, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:51, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > No, really, it _was_ crappy advice. Do you also instruct others to
> > install their own POP/SMTP/IMAP server when Hotmail goes down?
> >
> Depends on the person, but sure I would. People like to m
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:03, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:51, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > No, really, it _was_ crappy advice. Do you also instruct others to
> > install their own POP/SMTP/IMAP server when Hotmail goes down?
> >
> Depends on the person, but sure I would. People like to m
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:51, Jason Dixon wrote:
> No, really, it _was_ crappy advice. Do you also instruct others to
> install their own POP/SMTP/IMAP server when Hotmail goes down?
>
Depends on the person, but sure I would. People like to make things
work, learn, etc. Most of the people who take
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:16, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > Ed, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the tone of my previous
> > post. I get all worked up when folks give crappy advice. ;-)
> >
> It wasn't crappy advice, it's just different from your
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:16, Jason Dixon wrote:
> if you want, but it's
> obvious he doesn't have a clue.
Quick to strike aren't ya?
> Ed, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the tone of my previous
> post. I get all worked up when folks give crappy advice. ;-)
>
It wasn't crappy advice,
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:00, Marc Adler wrote:
> Ok, ok. So what should I do?
>
> Remove the offending line from /etc/resolves.conf (the first one, if I
> remember correctly) and the other local nameservers stuff, then:
Yup. Look back to my 2nd reply for further details. I made some
comments a
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 16:18]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:08, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:55:41PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> > >
> > > Wrong. DNS us
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:08, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:55:41PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> >
> > Wrong. DNS uses 53/tcp for zone transfers, 53/udp for normal queries.
> > Just
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:55:41PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> >
> > > I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> > It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
>
> > I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> > Could you explain that?
> >
> It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
> of opinion. The on
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:44:24PM -0500, NfoCipher wrote:
> >
> It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
Or it is configured for local use only:
options {
directory "/var/named";
listen-on { 192.168.10.1; };
[...]
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mai
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> Could you explain that?
>
It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
of opinion. The only time you need to secure a dns server is if your
port 53
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 14:40]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:55, Marc Adler wrote:
> > * Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 13:42]:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > > * NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-09
kapakipika? Or kapakipika.hawaii.rr.com? I went
> > > ahead and entered kapakipika by itself, and it seems to work, but would
> > > it be better to enter kapakipika.hawaii.rr.com?
> > >
> > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1
> > > > > nameserver 24.25.2
be better to enter kapakipika.hawaii.rr.com?
> >
> > > nameserver 127.0.0.1
> > > > nameserver 24.25.227.32
> > > > nameserver 24.25.227.34
> > > > nameserver 24.25.227.36
>
> I'm happy that your postfix is temporarily fixed, but I hope
ust enter kapakipika? Or kapakipika.hawaii.rr.com? I went
> ahead and entered kapakipika by itself, and it seems to work, but would
> it be better to enter kapakipika.hawaii.rr.com?
>
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1
> > > nameserver 24.25.227.32
> > > nameserver 24.25.227.34
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 18:59, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> > but how do I know if they are valid?
> >
> Well, your isp is sending those to you via dhcp, so you can assume
> they're valid
* NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> > but how do I know if they are valid?
> >
> Well, your isp is sending those to you via dhcp, so you can assume
> they're
;
Also, edit your /etc/hosts file and enter your local boxes
ie:
192.168.0.1 LinuxBox
192.168.0.2 AnotherLinuxBox
This will speed up internal lookups.
> Also, is the delay in starting postfix related to DNS name resolution?
>
More than likely. Many services depend on a speedy dns repl
wasn't running so I'm assuming I should do the following to
get it started:
chkconfig named on
service named start
I don't want to screw anything up, so I want to make sure that the above
is correct before doing it.
Also, is the delay in starting postfix related to DNS name resolu
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> DNS settings? I'm too newbie to figure it out on my
> own.
Sounds like your problem. Make sure there are valid entries in
/etc/resolv.conf and/or make sure your named is running if you use that.
--
NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ChickenWare, LLC
I switched my mail transfer agent to postfix from sendmail about a month
ago and it worked just fine for a while, until I set up an nfs server
and then tried to set up a samba server (that's still underway). Now,
when I start the computer, it stops for around 30 seconds when trying to
sta
I need to setup postfix with virtual domains and be able to specify quota
for virtual users. I downloaded postfix 2.0.14 rpm for RH9. What should I
change in postfix config to use quota for virtual users?
The users will check their mail via vm-pop3d and openwebmail.
Thanks.
Alex
--
redhat
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:56:47 -0700
Jason Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok..I think this should be easy but im struggling right now (long day)
>
> I just downloaded and compiled cyrus-sasl-2.1.15...everything went smoothly...
>
> Now im working on building binary RPMS from a source RPM pr
Ok..I think this should be easy but im struggling right now (long day)
I just downloaded and compiled cyrus-sasl-2.1.15...everything went smoothly...
Now im working on building binary RPMS from a source RPM provided by Simon
Mudd...
The build was going fine until this error poppedup:
bin/postc
I am trying to set up postfix to accept
[EMAIL PROTECTED] since it is otherwise rejected
due to cannot find hostname error because of main.cf uce restrictions. As an
attempt to allow the connection, I created an access.db and put a permissive
permission in main.cf.
Even though my restrictions
make tidy
make makefiles CCARGS="-DUSE_SASL_AUTH -I/usr/include/sasl" \
AUXLIBS="-L/usr/lib -lsasl2"
make upgrade (assumes existing postfix installation)
create /usr/lib/sasl2/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: auxprop
sasldb2 must have r/w permissions to Postfix
Creat
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Jason Williams wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> I am currently working on mail server, running Postfix 2.0.12, which was
> installed via RPM from the following link:
>
> http://postfix.wl0.org/en/
>
> So here are my questions: (Bare with me...im f
Hello everyone.
I am currently working on mail server, running Postfix 2.0.12, which was
installed via RPM from the following link:
http://postfix.wl0.org/en/
So here are my questions: (Bare with me...im fairly new to all of this)
1.) It appears that I am going to need to do one of two things
is it possible to get smtp authenticating with a password in LDAP using
sasl? I assume you would need to use PAM.
I have a rh8 system whereby users can login with a password either in ldap
or shadow, I would like to do the same with SMTP Auth
--
http://www.seekitzone.com
http://www.e-securene
Worth a look and it's quite stable.
The only knock on Eudora (IMO) was that you could not whitelist around
some of the spam check (specifically header and body filters).
This is now fixed because you can "redirect" to a second instance. Works
like a champ and because PF is modular, there is very
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 15:52, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
> Hi. I am running Postfix on RH9. I am trying to use
> /etc/postfix/access to reject email addresses adn domains that send me
> spam. I followed the documentation on how to do this, and I run
> postmap /etc/postfix/access
>
Does anyone know if it is possible to configure multiple aliases to map to
one real mailbox on Postfix ?
What I get is this, if I add an alias twice
postalias: warning: /etc/postfix/aliases.db: duplicate entry:
and I assume it would select the last entry.
Regards
--
http://www.seekitzone.com
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 15:00:23 -0500 (CDT) Distribution Lists wrote:
> Does anyone know if it is possible to configure multiple aliases to
> map to one real mailbox on Postfix ?
>
> What I get is this, if I add an alias twice
> postalias: warning: /etc/postfix/aliases.db: duplicate
Hi. I am running Postfix on RH9. I am trying to use
/etc/postfix/access to reject email addresses adn domains that send me
spam. I followed the documentation on how to do this, and I run
postmap /etc/postfix/access
to rebuild the database every time I add a new entry. I have also tried
Upgraded to 2.0.13 tonight, from 1.1.11.
All mail delivery is seemingly working, but I now see the following error in the logs:
postfix/qmgr[]: warning: connect to transport filter: Connection refused
What does this mean?
(It probably means I didn't read something.)
--
redhat
Fryclau wrote:
I will move my mailserver from sendmail & imap to postfix +
courier-imap.
The reason is the authentication features with mysql.
The hard thing is move the mailbox to the new maildirs without losing
emails.
Easiest way is to set up the new mail server the way it should be
1 - 100 of 445 matches
Mail list logo
