On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Robert A. Hayden said:
RAH>On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
RAH>
RAH>> In my opinion a waste of time.. The 5 % gain is not worth the complete
RAH>> recompile, and it will give all kinds of weard problems...
RAH>
RAH>I dunno...I think there's some validity here of
On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> In my opinion a waste of time.. The 5 % gain is not worth the complete
> recompile, and it will give all kinds of weard problems...
I dunno...I think there's some validity here of some other RH problems
could be cleaned up at the same time. If the
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Michael J. McGillick wrote:
> Afternoon Hatters:
>
> This is just an informal poll to see if there is an interest in doing
> something like this. I'm interested in taking a Red Hat distribution, and
> recompiling it to all i686 RPMs. Further, I would like to investigate
Hi Mike
Nice project
--
»¶ÓʹÓà 21CN µç×ÓÓʼþϵͳhttp://www.21cn.com
Thank you for using 21CN Email system
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Mike,
Nice project.
--
»¶ÓʹÓà 21CN µç×ÓÓʼþϵͳhttp://www.21cn.com
Thank you for using 21CN Email system
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Mike,
Count me in. :-)
Gustav
"Michael J. McGillick" wrote:
>
> Afternoon Hatters:
>
> This is just an informal poll to see if there is an interest in doing
> something like this. I'm interested in taking a Red Hat distribution, and
> recompiling it to all i686 RPMs. Further, I would like t
Afternoon Hatters:
This is just an informal poll to see if there is an interest in doing
something like this. I'm interested in taking a Red Hat distribution, and
recompiling it to all i686 RPMs. Further, I would like to investigate the
possibility of changing a few things that the Red Hat inst
