Re: port forwarding with IP TABLES - bad argument

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Noah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: port forwarding with IP TABLES - bad argument $IPTABLES -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d $EXTIP --dport 10700 -j DNAT --to

RE: port forwarding with IP TABLES - bad argument

> -Original Message- > From: Noah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: port forwarding with IP TABLES - bad argument > > $IPTABLES -A PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d $EXTIP --dport 10700 > -j DNA

port forwarding with IP TABLES - bad argument

redhat 8.0 kernel 2.4.20-20.8 rc.firewall version 0.74 iptables v1.2.8 okay iptables is complaining of a bad argument error. I am attmepting to forward port 10700 using IPTABLES. What on earth am I doing wrong? I refered to the tutorial page for guidance: http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/IP-Masquerad

Re: Port Forwarding via SSH

this way. > > Larry S. Brown > Dimension Networks, Inc. > (727) 723-8388 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Gary Stainburn > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Port F

RE: Port Forwarding via SSH

PROTECTED] Subject: Port Forwarding via SSH Hi folks, I'm trying to set up a port forward using SSH so that I can collect my emails from home through the company firewall (it's okay, I'm the sysadmin so I won't be treading on any toes. >From the man page and various go

Re: Port Forwarding via SSH

Gary Stainburn said: > What I need to know is how can I do this without ssh opening up the > terminal session? The reason being that I want to start the ssh port > forward as part of my ip-up script and kill it as part of my ip-down > script. > > When I tried putting it in the background by sti

Port Forwarding via SSH

Hi folks, I'm trying to set up a port forward using SSH so that I can collect my emails from home through the company firewall (it's okay, I'm the sysadmin so I won't be treading on any toes. >From the man page and various googles I've come up with: ssh -L 110:stan:110 stan which opens up a t

Re: anyone using port forwarding?

Try SHOREWALL. It does port forwarding beautifully, among other things. For example - I have all my FTP requests going through the Linux machine, which is where the firewall is at, on over to a WindowsXP machine. As you can imagine this could be any other type of request as well. Works like

Re: anyone using port forwarding?

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Chuck Dutrow wrote: > Anyone using port forwarding successfully with one real address at the > router and int addresses for mail server, DNS server and RADIUS? Have a Firestarter supports port forwarding. Download it from Sourceforge. -- "Of course I'm in

Re: anyone using port forwarding?

On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:42:49PM -0800, Chuck Dutrow wrote: > > Anyone using port forwarding successfully with one real address at the router and > int addresses for mail server, DNS server and RADIUS? Have a howto? > > Help me out I am in a bind, not sure what the simpl

Re: anyone using port forwarding?

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:42, Chuck Dutrow wrote: > Anyone using port forwarding successfully with one real address at the > router and int addresses for mail server, DNS server and RADIUS? Have > a howto? > > Help me out I am in a bind, not sure what the simplest solution

anyone using port forwarding?

Anyone using port forwarding successfully with one real address at the router and int addresses for mail server, DNS server and RADIUS? Have a howto? Help me out I am in a bind, not sure what the simplest solution is. ChuckDo you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more

port forwarding using iptables

Dear All, I have a small query on setting up iptables for port forwarding. i am explaining my setup below over dial-up ethernet solaris -> RedHat Linux 7.2 > HW.Dev 5

Re: Port Forwarding Network Problem

Microsoft would not include it in the base product because they have another product they sell which does this. The first product was MS Proxy server, an appalling, so called firewall. It has now been replaced with ISA server. It is better, but not great. Both products do port forwarding and

RE: Port Forwarding Network Problem

Use something like wingate as a proxy/port forwarder. Turn off XP's firewall. Rgds, Darryl > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ted Hilts > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 3:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > S

Port Forwarding Network Problem

my gateway machine was Linux using ipchains and port forwarding. This works well but the required applications to communicate through the satellite will only work on a MS OS. So I managed to get Linux (the web page server) so it would communicate with XP Pro and vice versa including telnet, ftp

Re: Linux port forwarding and supplying unwanted gateway!?

er is the > VPN Gateway, as it needs to be. The default gateway for > the VPN gateway is the firewall. Redhat 7.3 has port > forwarding enabled and reverse path filtering disabled, > as required by the Freeswan VPN product. > > When a VPN Client establishes a VPN connection and

Linux port forwarding and supplying unwanted gateway!?

e Windows 2000 server is the VPN Gateway, as it needs to be. The default gateway for the VPN gateway is the firewall. Redhat 7.3 has port forwarding enabled and reverse path filtering disabled, as required by the Freeswan VPN product. When a VPN Client establishes a VPN connection and communicates

Linux port forwarding and supplying unwanted gateway!?

, as it needs to be. The default gateway for the VPN gateway is the firewall. Redhat 7.3 has port forwarding enabled and reverse path filtering disabled, as required by the Freeswan VPN product. When a VPN Client establishes a VPN connection and communicates with the Win2000 Server, Redhat seems t

Re: how to do port forwarding with "ipchains"

> Also, to Hiten, what's this REDIR that you mentioned ? An RPM package > or > an option within ipchains command ? > > Regards, http://www.google.com/search?q=REDIR+rpm&sourceid=opera&num=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 __ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Acce

Re: how to do port forwarding with "ipchains"

Dear all, Thanks to Trevor for his link. I have found what I needed to setup the port forwarding function. However, seems I still cannot solve my problem with this setting in place. This "ipchains" machine is also my ADSL gateway to the Internet, thus it also runs NAT (masquerading)

RE: how to do port forwarding with "ipchains"

--- Trevor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Raymond, > > contains > excellent > information on how to use ipchains to portforward packets. > > Trevor > > > you can also use REDIR it works great on my rhl 6.2 without messing with the ker

RE: how to do port forwarding with "ipchains"

2002 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to do port forwarding with "ipchains" Dear all, On my old ADSL gateway which still run kernel 2.2.18 with "ipchains", I need to setup port forwarding on it so that all incoming TCP/IP traffic to certain port of it would be forwa

how to do port forwarding with "ipchains"

Dear all, On my old ADSL gateway which still run kernel 2.2.18 with "ipchains", I need to setup port forwarding on it so that all incoming TCP/IP traffic to certain port of it would be forwarded to another machine. I know how to do this with iptables, but don't know how to a

Re: Port Forwarding

On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:58:56PM -, Mike Burger wrote: > > I think a google search for "BIND views" should get you the info you need. There was an aricle in SysAdmin Mag while ago that explained BIND views, exemples and all. Hopefully, it will be on their website. http://www.samag.com> E

Re: Port Forwarding

Yup...BIND 9.x supports split views...you can have an internal and external view of your domain...that is, for the internal network, your DNS spits out one set of addresses, and for outside requests, another. It's exactly how I'm handling the DNS for my domain, behind my firewall. I think a go

Re: Port Forwarding

At 09:07 06/09/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Actually, for the internal network, you're better using split horizon >DNS...also known as an itnernal view. etnlighten me? :) I did look into using DNS to solve this (we have internal and external nameservers, so this was a strong possibility) but my brai

Re: Port Forwarding

Actually, for the internal network, you're better using split horizon DNS...also known as an itnernal view. On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Nick Lindsell wrote: > > > > > > > 1.1.1.2. I understand that machines on the internal network (eth0) > > would not > > > > be able to make use of this, but as long

Re: Port Forwarding

> > > > 1.1.1.2. I understand that machines on the internal network (eth0) > would not > > > be able to make use of this, but as long as it works from the net > connection > > > (ppp0) then that is ok. That's all I need. But, of course, if there > is a way > > > where this would work for both

Re: Port Forwarding

ge.net). It'll write your IPTables for you > as well as NAT and Port Forwarding. Check it out. > > Anthony > > On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 21:06, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've spoken to a couple of people who tried port forwarding using

Re: Port Forwarding

On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 11:30, Gordon Messmer wrote: > The client will try to open the connection to your router > (1.1.1.1:8181). The router will forward the packet according to its > rules by changing the destination and forwarding it on as normal. The > server (1.1.1.2) gets the packet, but it

RE: Port Forwarding

is being forwarded to"'s gateway to the system doing the NAT port forwarding. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Port Forwarding

On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 19:54, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote: > > I don't understand why none of the iptables forwarding commands are working. > Before the command is issued, when a remote user attempts to connect to that > port, you get the Connection Refused message (as you would expect). After

Re: Port Forwarding

) - Original Message - From: "Gordon Messmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:11 AM Subject: Re: Port Forwarding > On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 18:06, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote: > > I would like port 8181 on my Red Ha

Re: Port Forwarding

On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 18:06, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote: > I would like port 8181 on my Red Hat box (7.2, kernel 2.4.9-34, let's say ip > is 1.1.1.1 (example only)) to be forwarded to port 80 on internal machine IP > 1.1.1.2. I understand that machines on the internal network (eth0) would not

Re: Port Forwarding

OUTING -i ppp0 -p tcp --dport -j DNAT > > --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport -m state --state NEW -d > > xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -j ACCEPT > > when you do port forwarding, it is not needed to put an ACCEPT chain > for INPUT or FORWARD Unl

Re: Port Forwarding

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 05 September 2002 09:06 pm, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote: > Hi all, > > I've spoken to a couple of people who tried port forwarding using > iptables and apparently it's not an easy task to accomplish. I've tr

Re: Port Forwarding

- Original Message - From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:15 AM Subject: Re: Port Forwarding > It works just fine, and isn't difficult, at all: > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i ppp

Re: Port Forwarding

wrote: > Hi all, > > I've spoken to a couple of people who tried port forwarding using iptables > and apparently it's not an easy task to accomplish. I've tried myself and > don't seem to have any luck whatsoever either (after reading numbers of > HOWTOs etc) so

Re: Port Forwarding

: "Kevin - KD Micro Software" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:06 AM Subject: Port Forwarding > Hi all, > > I've spoken to a couple of people who tried port forwarding using iptables > and apparently it's not a

Re: Port Forwarding

Kevin, skip home-brewed IPTables and use firestarter (http://firestarter.sourceforge.net). It'll write your IPTables for you as well as NAT and Port Forwarding. Check it out. Anthony On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 21:06, Kevin - KD Micro Software wrote: > Hi all, > > I've spoken to

Port Forwarding

Hi all, I've spoken to a couple of people who tried port forwarding using iptables and apparently it's not an easy task to accomplish. I've tried myself and don't seem to have any luck whatsoever either (after reading numbers of HOWTOs etc) so I'm asking here as a la

Re: port forwarding

Ok, what if I run apache on port 81 and only allow connection on port 443, then forward port 80 to the other box? jay On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 06:32, Mike Burger wrote: > You can have port 80 and port 443 running on the server, but only forward > port 443 through your firewall. > > DNS server do

Re: port forwarding

You can have port 80 and port 443 running on the server, but only forward port 443 through your firewall. DNS server doesn't enter into the picture, really...your filrewall needs to know who/where to forward the ports. On 2 Jul 2002, Jay Daniels wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I have one serve

port forwarding

Hello all, I have one server running apache but wish to forward port 80 to a second box on the lan which is running zope. I would like to connect ssl to the server but not allow connections on port 80. Then if anyone tries to connect to port 80 they get forwarded to the zope box. Now httpd.c

Re: IPTABLES port forwarding question.

Why are you trying to forward an IP on your firewall to the firewall system's localhost address? On Sun, 26 May 2002, Yoink! wrote: > I'm trying to get a peculiar port forwarding script working. > > The last part of it is this: I have a Windows box masqeraded by a Linux &g

IPTABLES port forwarding question.

I'm trying to get a peculiar port forwarding script working. The last part of it is this: I have a Windows box masqeraded by a Linux box, with the linux box connected to a cable modem. If someone on the Windows box wants to connect to say, www.windows.com, I want to redirect them to the

Fw: port forwarding

Here's what eric ng replied to me about how to configure port forwarding with 2.4.x kernels he asked me to post it since he can not post messages to the list thanks again Eric juaid - Original Message - From: "eric ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "juaid" &

Re: kernel 2.4.9-12 & port forwarding

On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 06:31, juaid wrote: > I need port forwarding running under kernel 2.4.9-12. > > I used ( in older kernels like 2.2.x ) the ipmasqadm command that doesnt > work under 2.4.x ( RedHat Linux 7.1) > How is this feature implemented under new kernels ? As far as I

kernel 2.4.9-12 & port forwarding

I need port forwarding running under kernel 2.4.9-12. I used ( in older kernels like 2.2.x ) the ipmasqadm command that doesnt work under 2.4.x ( RedHat Linux 7.1) How is this feature implemented under new kernels ? thanks in advance, juaid

Iptables And DNAT (port forwarding)

  Greetings,   I am using Redhat 7.2 (2.4.7-10) with Iptables (1.2.3) and I am attempting to forward my http traffic to an internal web server.   I have successfully setup NAT and MASQUERAD'ing for the internal network, but I am unable to forward any traffic.   Here is the firewall script I a

Re: Iptables and DNAT (port forwarding)

: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:53 AM Subject: Iptables and DNAT (port forwarding) Greetings,   I am using Redhat 7.2 (2.4.7-10) with Iptables (1.2.3) and I am attempting to forward my http traffic to an internal web server.   I have successfully setup NAT and

Iptables and DNAT (port forwarding)

Greetings,   I am using Redhat 7.2 (2.4.7-10) with Iptables (1.2.3) and I am attempting to forward my http traffic to an internal web server.   I have successfully setup NAT and MASQUERAD'ing for the internal network, but I am unable to forward any traffic.   Here is the firewall script I am

Apache on a private network (was Re: Port forwarding & masquerading- RH 7)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Bob Hartung wrote: > One question about httpd.conf: > I am running the main server as localhost for testing inside the >home network. I am running the server that will have [someday] outside >access as a virtual server. Maybe it should be the other way a

Re: Port forwarding & masquerading - RH 7

David, I will have to compare your ideas and the ipchains rules I have in place. This will take a while as I am new enough at this that I have to continually refer to books etc. I'll let you know in a couple of days - I do have a couple of ideas to pursue. One question about httpd.conf:

Re: Port forwarding & masquerading - RH 7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Bob Hartung wrote: > >5. Ideas and suggestions appreciated. It may be that my >problem is with the Virtual Server portion of httpd.conf Bob - I know it doesn't address your question, but I do recommend that if you're just getting started, you upgrade to a 2

Port forwarding & masquerading - RH 7

Hi again, I have a successful RH7 (updates and errata installed) masquerade server on a DSL line. I now want to set up an internal apache server and be able to access this from the outside [My IPS approves this for test purposes and has assigned a domain name that will resolve - at least when i

Re: port forwarding - ipmasqadm portfw versus xinetd

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote: > I've been doing a little reading on xinetd, and see that you can use it to > forward ports for services to other machines, just like you can with > ipmasqadm portfw. > > Could anyone offer an opinion regarding which is the better way to do > this, and

port forwarding - ipmasqadm portfw versus xinetd

Hi all I've been doing a little reading on xinetd, and see that you can use it to forward ports for services to other machines, just like you can with ipmasqadm portfw. Could anyone offer an opinion regarding which is the better way to do this, and why? Also, I just noticed the ipchains rpm on

Re: port forwarding

sorry, I missed that too. I don't have time to try autofw, but this will get you going for now for port in 6070 6071 6072 6073 6074 6075 6076 6077 6078 6079 6080; do ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L $port -R 192.168.0.2 $port done Just add your ports to the for line. In perl you can do a range

Re: port forwarding

> From:Jeremy Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I can successfully forward a single port using: > > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L -R > > I guess that maybe you are just missing the source IP address? Yes and no. Yes, I'm missing the source IP, but I've been trying to use "ipmasqadm autofw"

Re: port forwarding

RH6.2 >kernel 2.2.14-5.0 w/ ip_masq and ip__masq_autofw >ipmasqadm 0.27 for 2.2.13 > > This box has long been doing a fine of IP masquerade, and now I'm trying > to get port forwarding set up. I've read the HOWTO but so far none of the > suggestions are

Re: port forwarding

d ip__masq_autofw >ipmasqadm 0.27 for 2.2.13 > > This box has long been doing a fine of IP masquerade, and now I'm trying > to get port forwarding set up. I've read the HOWTO but so far none of the > suggestions are working. The howto suggests using "ipmasqadm a

Re: port forwarding

> Sent: Thursday, 5 October 2000 10:26 Subject: port forwarding Ingredients: RH6.2 kernel 2.2.14-5.0 w/ ip_masq and ip__masq_autofw ipmasqadm 0.27 for 2.2.13 This box has long been doing a fine of IP masquerade, and now I'm trying to get port forwarding set up. I've read

port forwarding

Ingredients: RH6.2 kernel 2.2.14-5.0 w/ ip_masq and ip__masq_autofw ipmasqadm 0.27 for 2.2.13 This box has long been doing a fine of IP masquerade, and now I'm trying to get port forwarding set up. I've read the HOWTO but so far none of the suggestions are working. The howt

Re: Port Forwarding Maybe? SOLVED

HOORAY!!! POKEY IS WITH US AS ALWAYS!! On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 05:24:25PM -0500, Stephen E. Hargrove wrote: > That's the ticket! Thank Michael. I modified httpd.conf to listen to > 192.168.1.10:80 and pointed the pinhole on the DSL router to > 192.168.1.10 and now is working perfectly. >

Re: Port Forwarding Maybe? SOLVED

That's the ticket! Thank Michael. I modified httpd.conf to listen to 192.168.1.10:80 and pointed the pinhole on the DSL router to 192.168.1.10 and now is working perfectly. Thanks again! -- Steve ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: Port Forwarding Maybe?

system on the same subnet if there is one. If you get web pages then we know that Apache is actually serving http to that network. If not, then you know that you have an Apache problem and not (exactly) a networking problem. If I read your setup correctly, you don't actually need to do any

Re: Port Forwarding Maybe?

Sorry for the confusing info in my original post. Let my try to clarify based on the questions received. "Michael R. Jinks" wrote: > > Does the DSL modem have two associated IP's as well -- 192.168.1.254 and > also the 66.x.x.x address you mention below? 192.168.1.254 is the internal IP addre

RE: Port Forwarding Maybe?

I realize that you have most likely already set up your IP-Masq rules, but here is a script file that will help assist in not only the IP-Masq aspect but should also fix your port forwarding problem. ftp://duke.eburg.com/pub/linux/init.firewall I use this script for most of my NAT needs

Re: Port Forwarding Maybe?

I didn't see any other responses to this, so let me offer this. Although you don't say so, it sounds like your internal web server is not running on the box with two nics, but some other machine in the 192.168.2.x network, lets say it has 192.168.2.3 for aguments sake. I believe you w

Re: Port Forwarding Maybe?

On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 06:23:55PM -0500, Stephen E. Hargrove wrote: > I've been chasing a problem now for a few days, and it's driving me nuts. > Hopefully someone here can shed some light on my obviously darkened (at > best) understanding. > > Two NICs: > 192.168.2.1 - internal network > 192.16

Port Forwarding Maybe?

I've been chasing a problem now for a few days, and it's driving me nuts. Hopefully someone here can shed some light on my obviously darkened (at best) understanding. Two NICs: 192.168.2.1 - internal network 192.168.1.10 - connects to DSL router 192.168.1.254 - DSL router/Modem I'm trying to let

RE: ipchains, port forwarding and 3 nic FWs

At 10:37 AM 9/13/2000 -0400, "Andy Schuler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >There's an example in the ipchains How-to very similar to the situation you >described > >http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IPCHAINS-HOWTO-7.html DOH! somehow I missed that! on reading, it doesn't exactly map (no masq on dmz) but it

RE: ipchains, port forwarding and 3 nic FWs

There's an example in the ipchains How-to very similar to the situation you described http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/IPCHAINS-HOWTO-7.html -shoe > >From: Chuck Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ipchains, port forwarding > >On Tue, 12

ipchains, port forwarding and 3 nic FWs

> >From: Chuck Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ipchains, port forwarding > >On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andy Schuler spewed into the bitstream: > >AS>Thanks! That's what I needed! > >It looked like a good link to me... :-) > &

RE: ipchains, port forwarding

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andy Schuler spewed into the bitstream: AS>Thanks! That's what I needed! It looked like a good link to me... :-) AS>On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andy Schuler wrote: AS> AS>AS>I've setup a router/firewall box running RH 6.2 and using ipchains. I'm AS>AS>wondering if it's possible to

RE: ipchains, port forwarding

Thanks! That's what I needed! On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andy Schuler wrote: AS>I've setup a router/firewall box running RH 6.2 and using ipchains. I'm AS>wondering if it's possible to forward requests on specific ports to machine AS>on the internal network. ie, a port 80 request will be passed thro

RE: ipchains, port forwarding

Yes, it can be done... No, I don't know how (sorry)... > -Original Message- > From: Andy Schuler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ipchains, port forwarding > > I've setup a rou

Re: ipchains, port forwarding

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andy Schuler spewed into the bitstream: AS>I've setup a router/firewall box running RH 6.2 and using ipchains. I'm AS>wondering if it's possible to forward requests on specific ports to machine AS>on the internal network. ie, a port 80 request will be passed through the AS>fi

ipchains, port forwarding

I've setup a router/firewall box running RH 6.2 and using ipchains. I'm wondering if it's possible to forward requests on specific ports to machine on the internal network. ie, a port 80 request will be passed through the firewall (int ip 192.168.1.1) to an internal box (192.168.1.5). Any ideas? T

Re: Port forwarding is cool, but...

Hello George, Friday, August 18, 2000, 8:18:14 AM, you wrote: GL> I finally got port forwarding working with my IP Masq GL> setup a few weeks ago. But... I have a few problems. GL> Here is my situation: GL> 1. My static IP is associated with my domain in the GL> following ways.

Re: Port forwarding is cool, but...

On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, George Lenzer wrote: > I finally got port forwarding working with my IP Masq > setup a few weeks ago. But... I have a few problems. > Here is my situation: > > 1. My static IP is associated with my domain in the > following ways. Example (These aren&#x

Port forwarding is cool, but...

I finally got port forwarding working with my IP Masq setup a few weeks ago. But... I have a few problems. Here is my situation: 1. My static IP is associated with my domain in the following ways. Example (These aren't the real addresses): Internet Address: 205.50.50.1 resolv

IP Masq/Port Forwarding security

A question for all you security folks... If I set up a RedHat 6.2 box as an IP Masq and Port Forwarding box with my web server and mail server being behind the firewall, is that more secure than just running those services on the firewall? I would imagine it is because any exploits that

Must be a simple solution: Port forwarding in 2.2.x and conflicting documentation and a confused admin leads no where

For the last 8 hours I've checked every Linux resource I know: read the latest IPMasq-howto (linuxdoc.org), FAQ's, readme's, etc. read hours worth of masq-admin mailing list archives etc. etc. And still cannot figure out my simple question: How do I port foward in 2.2.x?

SSH port forwarding

I finally finished installing openSSH, but can anyone tell me how to setup the server to monitor a port and when a connection is made forward the port internally to the ftp port on 21. Also, If this is a website/faq somewhere let me know as I would like to read about it, but don't see anything in

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

> Or a single web server running virtual domains. This single web server > would get all port 80 traffic forwarded to it and figure out the correct > domain from the HTTP header. That wasn't the original request : Redirect the HTTP request to different IP's based on the domain-name. This simpl

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

sorry, I should have said this is done through mod_proxy, and the ProxyPassReverse directive is only present in Apache 1.3b6 and later. After reading up on it, this looks perfect! charles On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Charles Galpin wrote: > I posted a question on the mod-perl list since I thought this

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

I posted a question on the mod-perl list since I thought this could be done via apache. Here is a response I got that indicates it can be done with Apache (not needing mod-perl) >For example, requests to > >domA.com:80 ---> 192.168.1.1:80 >domB.com:80 ---> 192.168.1.2:80 This is probably off-top

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

on 22/2/2000 4:20 PM, Charles Galpin shot down the bitstream: > I sort of vaguely remember seeing somehwere that apache could act as some > sort of proxy and redirect virtual hosts to other internal machines (and > I'm assuming back out transparantly), but that could just be wishful > thinking. >

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

on 22/2/2000 3:20 PM, Igmar Palsenberg shot down the bitstream: >> Whenever joe user pulls up his web browser and goes to www.mydomain.com, the >> IPCHAINs box routes to 192.168.0.10 on the inside, whenever joe user pulls up >> his browser and goes to www.myotherdomain.com, the IPCHAINs box route

Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

I got a good response on this question from an admin on the linux-admin list. When I get home tonight I'll have to try it out. He said: > instead of an ipchains rule to accomplish this sort of port forwarding, > i've used a small tcp port redirector called redir - short

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

I'm glad someone finally cleared this up cuz I wuz pullin me hais out myself trying to figure a way. Although, I take exception to the statement that "ipchains has no knowledge of the HTTP protocol," I'm sure that is not what you really meant to say. >> Does anyone have some sample IPCHAI

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

I sort of vaguely remember seeing somehwere that apache could act as some sort of proxy and redirect virtual hosts to other internal machines (and I'm assuming back out transparantly), but that could just be wishful thinking. Anyone know about something like this? charles On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, I

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

Well I was using a Linux 6.0 box, and was able to use EASYFW and RINETD , it worked smooth only issue is, you can not re-direct FTP ports with RINETD (software issue) .. I had tried NETMAX's FIREWALL/ROUTER but IP address kept changing... so now I am stuck using NAT32 (on a WINBLOWS machine) ,

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

> Does anyone have some sample IPCHAINs rules to forward http requests > to > multiple web servers on a private network, based on the requested > domain? > I know that's not very clear, so let me explain a little > better: lets > say 192.168.0.10 and 192.168.0.11 are webservers on

Re: Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

"Toby A. Rider" wrote: > Does anyone have some sample IPCHAINs rules to forward http requests > to > multiple web servers on a private network, based on the requested > domain? That's not going to work. The connection has to be established (which means the packets have to be port forwarded/r

Port forwarding into a private network for multiple domains

Does anyone have some sample IPCHAINs rules to forward http requests to multiple web servers on a private network, based on the requested domain? I know that's not very clear, so let me explain a little better: lets say 192.168.0.10 and 192.168.0.11 are webservers on the internal net

Re: port forwarding, etc

PROTECTED] "The best remote administration tool for Windows-NT is a car ..." - On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Kurt Brust wrote: > I have Rinetd setup , and it works good, however, it does not allow port > forwarding to FTP an

  1   2   >