Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-05-06 Thread Ed Jaeger
172.16.0.0 to 172.31.0.0 Dave Wreski wrote: > > > > You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is > > > assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions > > > (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look > > > up RFC1918

Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-05-04 Thread Chris \"Cranky Spice\" Harshman
> >>I am using the standard bogus IP addresses > >>198.168.16.2 and 198.168.16.1 for my two machines with user names > >>I use a netmask of 255.255.255.0 for both machines. > > How about 192.168.1.0 or 10.0.0.0 not 192.168.16.0 What's wrong with 192.168.16.x ? The RFC lists everything in 192.

Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-05-04 Thread Dave Wreski
> > You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is > > assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions > > (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look > > up RFC1918 for details. (I know, because I made the same mistake)

Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-05-04 Thread Chuck Mead
On 28 Apr, Ed Jaeger wrote: > You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is > assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions > (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look > up RFC1918 for details. (I know, because I mad

Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-04-28 Thread Ed Jaeger
You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look up RFC1918 for details. (I know, because I made the same mistake)) Ed Jaeger, CFO

Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-04-27 Thread Dave Wreski
> I am using the standard bogus IP addresses > 198.168.16.2 and 198.168.16.1 for my two machines with user names > joseph.localdomain > and abraham.localdomain respectively. Where have you specified this information? > However when I try to connect to either machine from it's partner using >

Re: Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-04-27 Thread Steve Curry
Jimbo, I had the same problem you had and it turned out to be a 3com509 conflict. Like I belive I was trying to use address x300 on the card and as soon as I tried x340 on the card it worked. Linux found the card and everything looked ok but there was a hardware conflict

Network Almost ... Ah so close

1998-04-27 Thread James Hartley
hello: -- I have been trying to get ethernet networking up for the last couple of days. Currently I have compilied the kernal for ethernet support and 3 com support for my 3c509b cards. -- Now the kernal sees the cards at boot up properly. In addition I have configured the host tables and the e