Re: Man commands [solved]

2003-02-27 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 09:39 26 Feb 2003, Gene Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Cameron Simpson wrote: | >On 13:29 25 Feb 2003, Gene Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >| i just read this couple of weeks ago about finding out which | >| man () a particular information is by running this command | >| where it tells you

Re: Man commands [solved]

2003-02-26 Thread Gene Yoo
Cameron Simpson wrote: On 13:29 25 Feb 2003, Gene Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | i just read this couple of weeks ago about finding out which | man () a particular information is by running this command | where it tells you which man () is... can someone shed some | light into this again for

Re: Man commands

2003-02-25 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 13:29 25 Feb 2003, Gene Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | i just read this couple of weeks ago about finding out which | man () a particular information is by running this command | where it tells you which man () is... can someone shed some | light into this again for me :) thank you! Maybe

Man commands

2003-02-25 Thread Gene Yoo
i just read this couple of weeks ago about finding out which man () a particular information is by running this command where it tells you which man () is... can someone shed some light into this again for me :) thank you! -- <> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGN