On Saturday 30 August 2003 09:34 pm, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote:
> Yes, you're fine. I did some tests today and I get the same behavior. The
> logs look like it did a proxy transfer, but in reality it just sent my test
> homepage.
Allright. Thanks for the info and confirmation, Mike and Jeff.
RD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 21:00:48 EDT."
<[EM
On Saturday 30 August 2003 10:11 am, MKlinke wrote:
> On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:39, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> > First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable?
> >
> > RDB
>
> You should easily be able to duplicate the entry by telnetting into your
> web server on port 80 and
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:39, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable?
>
> RDB
You should easily be able to duplicate the entry by telnetting into your
web server on port 80 and issue the same or similar GET request. In my
case the URL req
First of all, is this dangerous and make my machine vulnerable?
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
-
/"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML
\ / email and proprietary forma
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:40 am, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote:
> H were these always commented out at install time or at some later
> time? If at a later time was apache restarted since the config changed?
The config has never been changed since install. Apache was recently restarted
(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:35:08 EDT."
<[EM
On Saturday 30 August 2003 01:24 am, Jeffrey F. Lawhorn wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Reuben D.
Budiardja" said:
> >I saw this in my http access_log. What does this mean?
> >
> >61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET
> > http://www.sina.com.cn/ HTTP/1.1" 200 5809
> >
> >I s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: message/rfc822
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suspiciously Weird Apache Log -- HELP
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2003 01:04:44 EDT."
<[EM
Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET http://www.sina.com.cn/
HTTP/1.1" 200 5809
Do you have an open proxy? Close it.
--
H| I haven't lost my mind; it's backed up on tape somewhere.
+
I saw this in my http access_log. What does this mean?
61.170.193.85 - - [30/Aug/2003:00:58:35 -0400] "GET http://www.sina.com.cn/
HTTP/1.1" 200 5809
I saw no corresponding error log.
Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks
RDB
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronom
Hi all,
just got port sentry up adn running. Couls someone help with what the
folowing logs could be referring to:
1. Feb 25 04:18:53 www named[430]: unapproved update from [X.X.X.X].1656
for domain.com
2. Feb 25 04:45:04 www telnetd[14561]: ttloop: read: Broken pipe
The first one appear i
12 matches
Mail list logo
