On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 08:30, Robert Vaughn wrote:
> The problem that I'm trying to solve is where SAR -d
> lists only the following device names...
I don't get a full list from 'sar -d' either. Could be a bug in sadc or
something... The web page notes some bugfixes in versions newer than
what wa
You're right. The device count is five. I get
confused with this whole zero number thing.
...Robert
--- Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 10:30, Robert Vaughn wrote:
> > Thanks for the response. I'm still a little lost.
>
> > You're right on the relationship betwe
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 10:30, Robert Vaughn wrote:
> Thanks for the response. I'm still a little lost.
> You're right on the relationship between major/minor
> and device names such as sda, sda1, sdb, etc.
>
> The system that we've been working on is connected to
> an EMC SAN. It uses Redhat AS
Thanks for the response. I'm still a little lost.
You're right on the relationship between major/minor
and device names such as sda, sda1, sdb, etc.
The system that we've been working on is connected to
an EMC SAN. It uses Redhat AS 2.1 (2.4 kernel).
The problem that I'm trying to solve is whe
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 14:21, Robert Vaughn wrote:
> The distinctive number does not translate 1 to 1 with
> the minor number. If this were the case then when I
> did the following I would get a different answer...
>
> ls -l /dev/sdbproduces 8,16
>
> Using your theory I would expect 8,1 w
Thanks for the response. However, the major/minor
theory still doesn't hold. According to 'man sar',
'm' is the major number of the device [correct, I
agree], whereas 'n' is a distinctive number.
The distinctive number does not translate 1 to 1 with
the minor number. If this were the case then
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 21:49, Robert Vaughn wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response. We had taken a look at
> the relationship between major and minor but dismissed
> that method based on the following.
>
> In SAR we were able to identify five devices.
> >From SAR...
> dev8-0
> dev8-1
> dev8-2
> de
Thanks for the quick response. We had taken a look at
the relationship between major and minor but dismissed
that method based on the following.
In SAR we were able to identify five devices.
>From SAR...
dev8-0
dev8-1
dev8-2
dev8-3
dev8-4
In IOSTAT five devices are identified, sda, sdb, sdc,
sdd
Robert Vaughn said:
> We are at a loss in understanding how SAR generated
> device IO stats relate to IOSTAT device stats.
> Specifically, SAR lists devices in the syntax of
> dev8-X while IOSTAT lists devices in the syntax of
> sdaX. We have not found a direct method of
> correlating dev8-X to sd
We are at a loss in understanding how SAR generated
device IO stats relate to IOSTAT device stats.
Specifically, SAR lists devices in the syntax of
dev8-X while IOSTAT lists devices in the syntax of
sdaX. We have not found a direct method of
correlating dev8-X to sdaX. I understand that, for
exa
10 matches
Mail list logo
