At 17:54 10/1/2003, you wrote:
Hi, anyone ever setup Mutt to work with an IMAP server. Basically Im
using RH9 with the version of Mutt that comes with it and want to setup
Mutt to use our Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP (they can make me pull
my mail from Exchange, but Ill be damned if Im
* Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031001 22:53]:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:54:45PM -0700, p p wrote:
> > Hi, anyone ever setup Mutt to work with an IMAP server. Basically Im
> > using RH9 with the version of Mutt that comes with it and want to
> > setup Mutt to use ou
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:54:45PM -0700, p p wrote:
> Hi, anyone ever setup Mutt to work with an IMAP server. Basically Im
> using RH9 with the version of Mutt that comes with it and want to
> setup Mutt to use our Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP (they can
> make me pull my mail f
Hi, anyone ever setup Mutt to work with an IMAP server. Basically Im using
RH9 with the version of Mutt that comes with it and want to setup Mutt to
use our Exchange server with IMAP and SMTP (they can make me pull my mail
from Exchange, but Ill be damned if Im going to use Outlook). Anyone
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 19:18, Peter Kiem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Running Evolution 1.2.2-5 on Red Hat 9 with a KDE desktop.
>
> Very often when applying filters to emails Evolution hangs with a
> "Pinging IMAP server" and then has to be killed via "killev" and
>
Hi,
Running Evolution 1.2.2-5 on Red Hat 9 with a KDE desktop.
Very often when applying filters to emails Evolution hangs with a
"Pinging IMAP server" and then has to be killed via "killev" and
restarted.
Are there any known fixes for this problem besides going back to Red H
Hello Oswaldo,
I would go with Courier the benefits are endless. I think that you will
find that if you follow the instructions to install it, its fairly
straightforward especially if you install rpms.
Use LDAP, that is what ADS is anyway, the trick is to get it to work, I
think t
Hi,
I need to install a IMAP4 server for 6000 users, and the authentication is
against Active Directory (M$ Windows). I´m thinking about using Cyrus or
Courier, and PAM + kerberos,LDAP or NTLM.
Which one is the best solution? Cyrus or Courier?
Thanks,
Oswaldo
--
redhat-list
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:01:49PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
> > I'm now able to send and recieve mail over my local network. I can also
> > send mail out, but I can't recieve mail from outside. I assume this is
> > because of my firewall. So, which ports need
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:01:49PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
> I'm now able to send and recieve mail over my local network. I can also
> send mail out, but I can't recieve mail from outside. I assume this is
> because of my firewall. So, which ports needs to be forwarded in order to
> get the mail s
> Yes, you can run both. This is *not* done in the MTA but provided by
> IMAP and POP3 servers. The standard imap server (from uw) provides both
> services. An MTA is never used to read mail - it's a Mail Transfer
> Agent - i.e. server to server. An MUA (Mail User Agent) is us
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:52:26PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
> > Sendmail is running, so that shouldn't be a problem. Perhaps it needs some
> > config?
>
> If you simply installed sendmail and did nothing to configure it, then
> it won't receive e-mail from ou
able to
> locate the technique by searching google.
Yes, you can run both. This is *not* done in the MTA but provided by
IMAP and POP3 servers. The standard imap server (from uw) provides both
services. An MTA is never used to read mail - it's a Mail Transfer
Agent - i.e. server to se
On 11/7/02 7:46 AM, "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:13:19PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Alan Peery wrote:
>>
>>> For IMAP, yes. IMAP doesn't receive email, it distributes it.
>>
>> Aha. So is there some other service I should set up to
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:52:26PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
> Sendmail is running, so that shouldn't be a problem. Perhaps it needs some
> config?
If you simply installed sendmail and did nothing to configure it, then
it won't receive e-mail from outside the box.
https://www.redhat.com/docs/manual
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Alan Peery wrote:
> It's waiting for input on standard input.
>
> cat /etc/hosts | mail -s "host name list" fred wilma
OK. I did this, but the there is still nothing in the users inbox when
opening pine, and the files in var/spool/mail are still empty.
I assume some kind of
Rune Berge wrote:
Try logging onto the box, and running the command
mail -s "test 1 2 3" fred wilma
to see if those two users are getting email.
this command doesn't return. Had to interrupt it with ctrl-c. Any clues to
what might be my problem?
It's waiting for input on s
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:13:19PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Alan Peery wrote:
> >
> > > For IMAP, yes. IMAP doesn't receive email, it distributes it.
> >
> > Aha. So is there some other service I should set up to recieve mail?
>
>
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:13:19PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Alan Peery wrote:
>
> > For IMAP, yes. IMAP doesn't receive email, it distributes it.
>
> Aha. So is there some other service I should set up to recieve mail?
Yes. You need an MTA (Mail Transfer Agent). This
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Alan Peery wrote:
> Rune Berge wrote:
>
> >OK. "$ netstat -an | grep 143" now returns the following:
> >tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:143 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
> >Is this how it's supposed to be?
> >
> For IMAP, yes. IMAP doesn't receive email, it distributes it.
Aha. So is ther
ne I've changed inbox-path to /var/spool/mail/[username]. Is that
correct?
If you have an IMAP server you should instead set this to point to the
IMAP server. From memory, the format is something like:
inbox-path=mail.company.com:INBOX
But how do I create mail accounts for the users?
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Eric Wood wrote:
> > > Then:
> > > $ netstat -an | grep 143
> > > check that you're listening on port 143.
> >
> > This, however, doesn't return anything. I guess that means I'm not
> > listening in port 143. What should I do?
>
> Activate the imap services:
> # chkconfig imap
- Original Message -
From: "Rune Berge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Verify that imap is on port 143:
> > $ getent services imap
>
> This returns "imap 143/tcp imap2" which I assume is a good sign.
>
> > Then:
> > $ netstat -an | grep 143
> > check that you're listening on port 143.
>
> This, h
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > I've installed redhat 8 on my server, and I would like to use it as an
> > IMAP server too. I've installed the IMAP package, but I don't know how to
> > proceed to get the server up and running. Does anybody know of a good
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:14:49PM +0100, Rune Berge wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I've installed redhat 8 on my server, and I would like to use it as an
> IMAP server too. I've installed the IMAP package, but I don't know how to
> proceed to get the server up and run
Hi.
I've installed redhat 8 on my server, and I would like to use it as an
IMAP server too. I've installed the IMAP package, but I don't know how to
proceed to get the server up and running. Does anybody know of a good
guide to setting up IMAP
List,
I was wondering if anyone has set up an IMAP server and used the
DIGEST-MD5 password security?
If so, could you please point me in the right direction to set this up
using the default IMAP server that comes with Red Hat 7.3.
Thanks a million
--
Joe Giles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AOL: mcigiles
Hi Guys,
I´m a newbie in managing IMAP servers and I have to administrate a machine
with Red Hat 7.0, IMAP service running, apache and Squirrelmail. First: how
can I know what type of IMAP server is installed ? Second: how can I create
e-mail accounts that are not linux users accounts ? The
On 5/13/02 10:30 AM, "Jim Hale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's fixed - found out that the problem would pop up when I was logged into
> the
> IMAP Server thru Outlook and then turn around and log into the same account
> thru the Browser.
>
> Thanks fo
It's fixed - found out that the problem would pop up when I was logged into the
IMAP Server thru Outlook and then turn around and log into the same account
thru the Browser.
Thanks for responding though.
Jim Hale
---
Jim & Kathy's Website Collection
http://hale.dyndns.org
I read on the linuxconf mailing list that there is a new vimap version that
will allow multiple connections to the same imap user box if the mail file
is converted to mbx format on the linux server. I hope Friedrich didn't
mind my cross posting his message.
-eric wood
Hi!
If you always wanted
box (which I just recently
> installed IMP) - now everything seems to work fine for the most part,
> but every so often, Outlook comes back with an error that it lost
> connection with the IMAP Server. If I go back and click on a folder
> (thru Outlook) located ON the IMAP Server, it&#x
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 2:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mailing List - IMP
> Subject: RE: Outlook XP And Linux IMAP Server
>
>
> That happens to me when I use another imap client to access
> the same account simultaneously.
>
> Chris Mason
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
: Sunday, May 12, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Mailing List - IMP
Cc: Mailing List - Red Hat (Co)
Subject: Outlook XP And Linux IMAP Server
Not sure if this is a Linux or IMP issue so sorry for the Crossposting.
I'm trying to do away with the Exchange 2000 Box. I'm experimenting with
keeping all my f
but every so often, Outlook comes back with an error that it lost
connection with the IMAP Server. If I go back and click on a folder
(thru Outlook) located ON the IMAP Server, it's all fine.
Has anyone else run into this issue?
Thanks!
Jim Hale
-
Jim & Kathy's Website Collectio
gary
- Original Message -
From: "Wesley Jay Deypalan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: sendmail or imap server recieving mails?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can telnet my mail server using telnet xxx.www.zzz
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: sendmail or imap server recieving mails?
>Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:23:11 -0800 (PST)
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Wesley Jay Deypalan wrote:
>
> >Just a clarification, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wesley Jay Deypalan wrote:
>Just a clarification, I configure our mail server using sendmail and
>imap2000, I use the rpm package to install sendmail and imap2000, I can
>already send mails but cannot recieve any mails, the error messages states
>tha
Hi,
Just a clarification, I configure our mail server using sendmail and imap2000, I use the rpm package to install sendmail and imap2000, I can already send mails but cannot recieve any mails, the error messages states that it cannot locate our domain. My question is what do i need to configur
> > Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
> > Sendmail book?
>
> No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail.
Excellent man pages though. Try `man procmail` `man procmailrc` and
`man procmailex` but for procmail to serve you with this problem
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, David Talkington wrote:
>
> smtppop3pub.verizon.net - relays for any [EMAIL PROTECTED] envelope
> (30 January 2001)
>
> That's an embarrassment.
> - -d
you are way too kind :)
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Thornton Prime wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
>> Sendmail book?
>
>No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail.
And arcana it is.
Mike: 'man procma
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
> Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
> Sendmail book?
No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail.
thornton
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
Sendmail book?
mw
Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
>
> > I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by
> > safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Charles Galpin wrote:
>Yes, as dumb as it sounds it's true. So I can freely send email thru any
>of the smtp.gte.net servers is I say I am [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try
>it. Tell your spammer friends. I have told them numerous times and
>explained in exruciating detail
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
> I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by
> safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to educate myself
> more.
It's not part of sendmail, but the default RH sendmail config delivers
through procmail. Procmail
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, David Talkington wrote:
>
> Y'all really don't need to mess with maintaining your own outbound
> mail relays on DSL lines, though. Use the ISP's relay, and let them
> worry about it; that's part of what you're paying them for!
Unless they are f*ing idiots like gte.net. My
I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by
safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to educate myself
more.
Mike W
Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
>
> > The problem: I have a domain. The registrar provides mail and U
receive only around 50 emails from customers each day.
> >>
> >> In theory, it doesn't matter. Assuming your connection is 24/7, you
> >> can run sendmail right out of the box, because all it needs to do is
> >> deliver locally what fetchmail retrieves. The works
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
> The problem: I have a domain. The registrar provides mail and URL
> forwarding. BUT...all the mail forwarding goes to a single e-mail address.
> When the mail arrives for 4 different users into the same mail spool, can
> Sendmail place the mail into the
, you
>> can run sendmail right out of the box, because all it needs to do is
>> deliver locally what fetchmail retrieves. The workstations can just
>> use your ISP's mail relay outbound, which saves you a lot of hassle.
>>
>> >2. Is Cyrus the best choice for IMAP se
s can just
> use your ISP's mail relay outbound, which saves you a lot of hassle.
>
> >2. Is Cyrus the best choice for IMAP server?
>
> In your case, it may be the only choice, if I remember correctly.
> I'm not speaking from experience here, only past research, but
un sendmail right out of the box, because all it needs to do is
deliver locally what fetchmail retrieves. The workstations can just
use your ISP's mail relay outbound, which saves you a lot of hassle.
>2. Is Cyrus the best choice for IMAP server?
In your case, it may be the only choice, if I
accessed, and replied, from any of the Win98/98 PCs, via Outlook. I
understand that this can be done by transferring all incoming email to a
single "mailbox" in the RH7 box, and then running an IMAP server.
I think I have to do this:
1. Install an MTA on the RH7 box. This can be sendmail, e
54 matches
Mail list logo
