Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-28 Thread Bret Hughes
IIRC IBM is going to skip 1.2 and will release 1.3 soon. Bret Gustav Schaffter wrote: > > Paul, Bernhard and others, > > IBM's JDK has always been known for being a high performance port of > Java. > > Unfortunately, it's still at level 1.1.8. I've read

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Gustav Schaffter
Paul, Bernhard and others, IBM's JDK has always been known for being a high performance port of Java. Unfortunately, it's still at level 1.1.8. I've read somewhere in their *huge* labyrint of web pages, that they will ship 1.2 during Q1-2000. Looking forward to it. I think it w

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, J. Scott Kasten wrote: > What do you mean not free? IBM has it on their site for anyone to suck down. Uses a license that is not compliant with the free software and open source definitions. http://www.opensource.org/osd.html http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/basic-freedoms.ht

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Bret Hughes
Paul Watkins wrote: > > It is free along with a bunch of other software by IBM for Linux; > > go to this location: http://www.ibm.com/developer/linux/ > > and scroll to the bottom of the page under downloads -- there you will find > links to the JDK and other stuff. > In rpm format no less

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread J. Scott Kasten
What do you mean not free? IBM has it on their site for anyone to suck down. On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:07:07PM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > jdk is not free, so I guess it's on the Commercial Applications CD. > LLaP > bero -- J. Scott Kasten jsk AT tetracon-eng DOT net "I'm a .sign

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Paul Watkins wrote: > It is free along with a bunch of other software by IBM for Linux; free as in $0 != free software... LLaP bero -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Paul Watkins
000, Steve Dixon wrote: > > > i thought that ibm's jdk was supposed to be in redhat's new releases? i > > dont see it anywhere. > > jdk is not free, so I guess it's on the Commercial Applications CD. > > LLaP > bero > > -- > To unsubscribe: m

Re: IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Steve Dixon wrote: > i thought that ibm's jdk was supposed to be in redhat's new releases? i > dont see it anywhere. jdk is not free, so I guess it's on the Commercial Applications CD. LLaP bero -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

IBM's jdk

2000-03-27 Thread Steve Dixon
i thought that ibm's jdk was supposed to be in redhat's new releases? i dont see it anywhere. they are still including jikes and kaffe, but no jdk. or is it supposed to be in the souped up versions of RH(oracle stuff)? thats seems pretty poor if it is. -- - S