RE: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Jeff Graves wrote: >> yes, he should be able to if > > >Of course this assumes the route exist for the interface > >and the "local" network. > > he had the 192.168.1.0 entry in the tables. > Ermm... excuse me, I'm on a 192.168.0.x network. :-) But your point is taken. > > H

RE: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Jeff Graves
>He should be able to ping the local windows boxes without the default >route right? yes, he should be able to if >Of course this assumes the route exist for the interface >and the "local" network. he had the 192.168.1.0 entry in the tables. >The default would only be used if a host not in >th

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > > He should be able to ping the local windows boxes without the default > route right? Of course this assumes the route exist for the interface > and the "local" network. The default would only be used if a host not in > the local net was accessed. The

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Bret Hughes
Jeff Graves wrote: > If there's no default route listed when you issue the command > route -n, then you won't be able to ping out. If you type route you > should get 4 entries (that's what I get on all the default install > boxes i have): > > DestGateMask

RE: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Jeff Graves wrote: > If there's no default route listed when you issue the command > route -n, then you won't be able to ping out. If you type route you > should get 4 entries (that's what I get on all the default install > boxes i have): > > Dest GateMas

RE: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Jeff Graves
ld look different. But the point is, to get to the internet you need the default route and to ping other machines on the subnet you need the 192.168.1.0 entry. -Original Message- From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Steve Arnold
John Aldrich wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, eric clover wrote: > > ICMP disabled/blocked in the firewall on the box??? > > mine is on my box at home and i can not ping anything and pings to the box > > are blocked > > eric > > > Well the wierd thing is it just suddenly stopped working yesterday.

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Steve Arnold
John Aldrich wrote: [snip] > I don't know what route -n says, haven't checked that yet, but on my > AMD k6 box here at work, "route" by itself shows the existing routes. > Ifconfig eth0 shows the "normal" stuff, as I recall. I don't have > that machine set up and hooked up to a monitor at the mome

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, eric clover wrote: > ICMP disabled/blocked in the firewall on the box??? > mine is on my box at home and i can not ping anything and pings to the box > are blocked > eric > Well the wierd thing is it just suddenly stopped working yesterday. It was working and then all of a su

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread eric clover
1 AM Subject: Re: Help! Network stopped working! > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Jake McHenry wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > > > > --I don't know for sure but I would be suprised if even ping would work if > > --there was a 10/100 MB confusion. > >

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Jake McHenry wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > > --I don't know for sure but I would be suprised if even ping would work if > --there was a 10/100 MB confusion. > > > that's right. If you have a 10 meg network, and try to link up at 100 meg, > the link ligh

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: > What is the purpose of this machine? Is it your gateway/ firewall/ masq > box or just a workstation. I don't think you need a default route if > there is only eth0 as an interface (i.e. workstation). You will need a > gateway entry if you need to access

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Jake McHenry
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Bret Hughes wrote: --I don't know for sure but I would be suprised if even ping would work if --there was a 10/100 MB confusion. that's right. If you have a 10 meg network, and try to link up at 100 meg, the link lights normally will blink, or just not come on at all. It wi

Re: Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread Bret Hughes
John Aldrich wrote: > My linux box at home is a dual-PPro motherboard (only uni-processor > right now -- 2nd CPU died) with a built-in 10/100 Intel EtherExpress > NIC. > For some reason it has stopped seeing the network. My *guess* since I > can ping the box from another machine is that somehow i

Help! Network stopped working!

2000-07-31 Thread John Aldrich
My linux box at home is a dual-PPro motherboard (only uni-processor right now -- 2nd CPU died) with a built-in 10/100 Intel EtherExpress NIC. For some reason it has stopped seeing the network. My *guess* since I can ping the box from another machine is that somehow it got set to 100 Megabit-only