Antonomasia wrote:
> > We're running an RH linux firewall, but users are starting to complain
> > about the problems using passive FTP. On large file transfers, the file
> > will get to 100% or very close, and just hang. Since we're on ISDN, a 10
> > meg file is a significant investment of time,
> We're running an RH linux firewall, but users are starting to complain
> about the problems using passive FTP. On large file transfers, the file
> will get to 100% or very close, and just hang. Since we're on ISDN, a 10
> meg file is a significant investment of time, and getting that far only to
We went through passive FTP hell here as well until I added the following to
our /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall (called from rc.local):
# load ip masquarading modules
modprobe ip_masq_ftp
modprobe ip_masq_irc
modprobe ip_masq_raudio
BUT...we are running masquerading, so I don't know if this would work fo
on to your problem may well be the
implementation of a proxy.
Hope that helps a little, anyway.
Beth :0)
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 1998 2:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Firewall FTP Problems
>
&
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Doug Roberts wrote:
> We're running an RH linux firewall, but users are starting to complain
> about the problems using passive FTP. On large file transfers, the file
You should use IP accounting and see if you can figure out what is
happening to your bandwidth. Are you als
We're running an RH linux firewall, but users are starting to complain
about the problems using passive FTP. On large file transfers, the file
will get to 100% or very close, and just hang. Since we're on ISDN, a 10
meg file is a significant investment of time, and getting that far only to
fail is
