Re: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread Michael Fratoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 23 September 2002 01:35 pm, Michael Pahle wrote: > From: "Bret Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > my guess is that ls -lh is closer > > Sorry, but the output of ls -h is not different to ls. > And the output of ls -lh is not different to ls -l

RE: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread Asish Balakrishnan
hi brad, iam not suure whether ls -h gives you the size in mb oor not.I had tried it out here .it just ressembled ls.you can get a listing of sizes in kb or possibly if the file is large enough to be in mb by ls -sh. regards, Balakrishnan Asish On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Bradley Caricofe wrote:

RE: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread Rechenberg, Andrew
How about ls -lh? :) -Original Message- From: Bradley Caricofe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 8:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Dumb File Size Question > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: > > When I do

Re: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread Asish Balakrishnan
hi, the -h flag is meant for printing the file size in human readable form. if you wish to know the size in kb it can be obtained by ls -sh filename. regards, Balakrishnan Asish On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: > > When I

Re: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread Michael Pahle
From: "Bret Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 4:24 AM > On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:20, Ed Wilts wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: > > > When I do a ls in a directory on my RH 7.2 machine, how can I have i

Re: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread John Thomas
Use ls -l (that's the letter "l") I have this aliased on my systerm to "dir" JT Bradley Caricofe wrote: >>On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: >> >>>When I do a ls in a directory on my RH 7.2 machine, how can I have it >>>display file sizes in MB? >>> >>Is ls -h c

RE: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-23 Thread Bradley Caricofe
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: > > When I do a ls in a directory on my RH 7.2 machine, how can I have it > > display file sizes in MB? > > Is ls -h close enough? Hi Ed, ls -h shows the same thing a regular ls shows. I haven't edited anything on this system so

Re: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-22 Thread Bret Hughes
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 16:20, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: > > When I do a ls in a directory on my RH 7.2 machine, how can I have it > > display file sizes in MB? > > Is ls -h close enough? my guess is that ls -lh is closer Bret -- redha

Re: Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-22 Thread Ed Wilts
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Bradley Caricofe wrote: > When I do a ls in a directory on my RH 7.2 machine, how can I have it > display file sizes in MB? Is ls -h close enough? -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

Dumb File Size Question

2002-09-22 Thread Bradley Caricofe
When I do a ls in a directory on my RH 7.2 machine, how can I have it display file sizes in MB? thanks, Brad -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list