On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Hossein S. Zadeh wrote:
> Lance:
> > This is wrong. The DHCP RFCs specify that dynamic lease information
> > must be written to permanent storage before the lease can be confirmed
[--snip--]
> Isn't it what I wrote??!!
>
> I wrote the file on the harddisk is used for recov
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Lance A. Brown wrote:
> This is wrong. The DHCP RFCs specify that dynamic lease information
> must be written to permanent storage before the lease can be confirmed
> by the server. This provides a mechanism for recovering lease
> information in case there is a server softw
Hossein S Zadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DHCP server does not technically need to keep a database (on RedHat,
> /etc/dhcpd.leases by default) on hard disk. In fact under Linux it does
> not consult the database on the harddisk when handing out leases. DHCP
> server keeps an internal database
LL clients, not just M$'s ( ... oh
the world/Internet according to Microsoft ).
Happy tweaking !
"Hossein S. Zadeh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/09/2000 03:51:23 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: DHCP IP Assignments, Linux vs
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> oh yes I did understand : > .
:-)
I did not question you understanding it; from one of your prevoius posts I
realized that you are quite knowledgable in this.
>
> The problems I was referring to is as follows (I have run into this many
> tim
iant with ALL clients, not just M$'s ( ... oh
the world/Internet according to Microsoft ).
Happy tweaking !
"Hossein S. Zadeh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/09/2000 03:51:23 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: DHCP IP Assignments, Li
06 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: DHCP IP Assignments, Linux vs Win98
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> the dhcp server will check assigned IP's over the network based on the
> global period assigned on t
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Chad W. Skinner wrote:
> Regarding the information below: I believe I read in the documentation for
> dhcp a while back that the dhcp server keeps a database of the clients and
> the ip numbers assigned to them. From my understanding this was so that the
> server could reassig
I am jumping in the middle of the thread, but have been reading this with
curiosity. It is an Interesting discussion, but I have a question.
Regarding the information below: I believe I read in the documentation for
dhcp a while back that the dhcp server keeps a database of the clients and
the ip
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The disadvantage ( of win9x client saving the dhcp supplied IP ) is when
> there is trouble on the dhcp server
> ( I have seen this on NT server) or network, that you have to somehow clear
> the IP address from the win9x client
> so it can get a new I
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000, Larry Mintz wrote:
> So you are saying Windows is better at networking than Linux ? Right.
Nothing could be farthest from the truth. All I said was that Windows uses
a mechanism for DHCP renewal after reboot which makes life easier. The
mechanism happens to work to the benef
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 07:44:33PM -0600, M. Smith wrote:
> J. Scott Kasten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> >I'm not convinced that this etiology is totally correct, (although is
> >on the right track.)
> >
> >Smith didn't indicate whether it was an NT server offering the DHCP.
> >For argum
Sam Bayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One thing that would be kind of interesting would be to monitor the
> dhcp conversation with tcpdump to see what the difference is between
> the linux and windows requests. Can you even run tcpdump BEFORE you
> initialize a NIC?
I'm glad you've brought thi
sparsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the dhcp server will check assigned IP's over the network based on
> the global period assigned on the server ( e.g. 3 days). If the IP (
> client ) is still there, it will renew the lease ( for another 3
> days, etc.). If the client IP is not connected, it
J. Scott Kasten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>I'm not convinced that this etiology is totally correct, (although is
>on the right track.)
>
>Smith didn't indicate whether it was an NT server offering the DHCP.
>For argument's sake, I'll assume it is. The NT server keeps a hash
>with your ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> the dhcp server will check assigned IP's over the network based on the
> global period assigned on the server ( e.g. 3 days). If the IP ( client )
> is still there, it will renew the lease ( for another 3 days, etc.). If
> the client IP is not connected, it will mark
I'm not convinced that this etiology is totally correct, (although is
on the right track.)
Smith didn't indicate whether it was an NT server offering the DHCP.
For argument's sake, I'll assume it is. The NT server keeps a hash
with your mac and assigned address. Even if you request a new lease,
OTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: DHCP IP Assignments, Linux vs Win98
I am doing a pretty weird thing to keep my IP but it looks like it is
working OK :
- I start the network using dhcp . give a look at the IP using ifconfig.
- I change the network config to NOT USE dhcp and assign manually the IP
obtaine
(
which has now been assigned
to a different machine by the server ), you have a conflict.
"Hossein S. Zadeh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/06/2000 08:03:50 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'Redhat Linux Qestions'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject
On 07-Jan-00 Hossein S. Zadeh wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, M. Smith wrote:
>
>> Over the past two months or so, I've been experimenting with Linux RH
>> 6.0 as a gateway/firewall machine. I permanently switched to the Linux
>> firewall about a week ago. One thing I've noticed during
>> experimen
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 10:24:17PM -0700, Philippe Moutarlier wrote:
>
> I am doing a pretty weird thing to keep my IP but it looks like it
> is working OK :
>
> - I start the network using dhcp . give a look at the IP using
> ifconfig.
> - I change the network config to NOT USE dhcp and assign
I am doing a pretty weird thing to keep my IP but it looks like it is working OK :
- I start the network using dhcp . give a look at the IP using ifconfig.
- I change the network config to NOT USE dhcp and assign manually the IP obtained
above.
I could keep my IP over 2 months this way till th
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, M. Smith wrote:
> Over the past two months or so, I've been experimenting with Linux RH
> 6.0 as a gateway/firewall machine. I permanently switched to the Linux
> firewall about a week ago. One thing I've noticed during
> experimentation and since the switch is that the Linux
While not a problem that demands a fix, I have noticed something as a
relatively new Linux user that I would like to understand.
For several years, I used Win95/98 and the Wingate modem sharing
program to connect my home computers through a single internet
connection. When I got a DSL line instal
24 matches
Mail list logo
