-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
rpjday wrote:
>> > Forgive me for being dense, but why would one want to compile as a
>> > module a driver which is needed for the system to even boot? Modules
>> > are great for peripherals and supporting functions, and I can see the
>> > benefit o
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
> Simply put, I don't know.
>
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> > >If you compiled the kernel with the device drivers as modules, and not
> > >direct
Simply put, I don't know.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mike Burger wrote:
>
> >If you compiled the kernel with the device drivers as modules, and not
> >directly into the kernel, and any of those drivers/modules are needed
I'm currently using X-CD-Roast...but I'll look at some others at some
point, too.
On 19 Jan 2002, Brandon Robert Dorman wrote:
> I compiled most everything I'll need into the kernel. cdburner, visor,
> usb printer/scanner stuff, etc. but for next time, thanks for the info
> Bret, Mike and Wer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Burger wrote:
>If you compiled the kernel with the device drivers as modules, and not
>directly into the kernel, and any of those drivers/modules are needed for
>the initial startup, it could cause problems.
>
>If you compiled all those driver
I compiled most everything I'll need into the kernel. cdburner, visor,
usb printer/scanner stuff, etc. but for next time, thanks for the info
Bret, Mike and Werner.
-Brandon
p.s. this doesn't have to be a list question, but what do you guys
recommend for a cd-burning software? Now that I
That'll kinda depend.
If you compiled the kernel with the device drivers as modules, and not
directly into the kernel, and any of those drivers/modules are needed for
the initial startup, it could cause problems.
If you compiled all those drivers directly into the kernel, instead of as
module
Before I got this e-mail i just removed the initrd line and rebooted.
now i get:
[Brandon@localhost Brandon]$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.17 #1 Sat Jan 19 19:28:25 PST 2002 i686
unknown
:-) So it works. Is there any danger in doing that? seems to work
fine for me right now tho
Check out man mkinitrd. seems like I have always just given it the
kernel version and the imgfile name needed.
I guess the real question is do you really need an initrd? Unless you
need something like scsi drivers that you compiled as modules that need
to be availible before the file systems ar
On 19 Jan 2002, Brandon Robert Dorman wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Was recompiling my kernel today to 2.4.17 from 2.4-7-10. Upon changing
> my lilo.conf, ran /sbin/lilo and got this:
> Added linux
> fatal: open /boot/initrd-2.4.17: no such file or directory. Sure
> enough, a ls of /boot shows:
Hey guys,
Was recompiling my kernel today to 2.4.17 from 2.4-7-10. Upon changing
my lilo.conf, ran /sbin/lilo and got this:
Added linux
fatal: open /boot/initrd-2.4.17: no such file or directory. Sure
enough, a ls of /boot shows:
ls /boot
boot.b kernel.hmodule-info-
Hi Everyone,
How are you?
I have been using stock RH kernel rpms for a long time. But now,
wishing to usr reiserfs, I need to build a tailored kernel but get an
error:
'unresolved ref: memcpy'
Do you know how to fix it?
My platform is Intel Celeron 667/128MB/RH7.0/Kernel 2.2.18.
12 matches
Mail list logo