Title: Message
I am running Red Hat
9I have just compiled the kernel 2.6.0-test5 on a Dell 1400SC with SCSI hard
drives. After doing all the steps needed to compile the kernel, I then
type Make Install. I now get " No module aic7xxx found for kernel
2.6.0-test5
mkinitrd
failed.
I then d
Should I just re-install perl?
I really need to get this working.
Mark
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 19:27, Mark wrote:
> Installman1 is what is on that line.
>
> I have attached the Makefile.
>
> Mark
> On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 19:06, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > On 18:12 22 Jun 2003, Mark <[EMAIL PROT
Installman1 is what is on that line.
I have attached the Makefile.
Mark
On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 19:06, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 18:12 22 Jun 2003, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I am trying to get the perl IPTables::IPv4 module installed and I am
> | having problems. I get a Makefile:86:
On 18:12 22 Jun 2003, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I am trying to get the perl IPTables::IPv4 module installed and I am
| having problems. I get a Makefile:86: *** missing separator. Stop.
| error every time i try to make.
|
| Any ideas?
|
| I am using Redhat 9.
|
| I tried both the cp
Hello,
I am trying to get the perl IPTables::IPv4 module installed and I am
having problems. I get a Makefile:86: *** missing separator. Stop.
error every time i try to make.
Any ideas?
I am using Redhat 9.
I tried both the cpan install and a manual install from the tar file.
Same error.
Hi All,
I have been trying to custom my redhat 8 kernel, just adding a few
things and i get these failed errors, any clues?
Matt
Mar 2 19:47:31 earth netfs: Mounting other filesystems: succeeded
Mar 2 19:47:05 earth rc.sysinit: Loading default keymap succeeded
Mar 2 19:47:05 earth unicode_s
It has been standard practice with Red Hat as long as I have been using
linux (MKLinux DR3 was my first distro - and that was Red Hat 5.1 except
with the Mach 3 mikrokernel and ppc binaries) to create a package
containing just the stuff the user needs to use the software (binary,
config files, docu
Hi,
The reason the program didn't compile had something to do with
bzip2. If I installed the rpm bzip2-development it worked like
a charm... same thing if I downloaded the bzip2 source code
and compiled that. I think it's stupid that the bzip2-development
package wasn't installed in the first plac
Hi,
My problems are now addressed to the source code of the
software I tried to compile, so I guess it's not really glibc's
fault. But I'll keep my eyes open! :-)
Thanks for all your answers.
/dahonk
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https:/
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:31:40 +0100, Rikard Bostrom wrote:
>
>> I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages
>> there is to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I
>> try to compile certain
>> programs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:31:40 +0100, Rikard Bostrom wrote:
> I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages
> there is to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I
> try to compile certain
> programs. I used to run
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 15:31, Rikard Bostrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages there is
> to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I try to compile
> certain
> programs. I used to run Slackware 8.1, and all programs compiled fine
Hi,
I'm running RedHat 8.0. I've installed all the development packages there is
to be installed, but I still get errors and make stops when I try to compile
certain
programs. I used to run Slackware 8.1, and all programs compiled fine under
it.
Does this has something to do with RedHat 8.0 shippi
--- Reply to a message ---
By: John Telford
->: a Mail
:>: Red Hat 2.4.18-5 kernel Compile Problems
> /usr/src/linux-2.4/configs/kernel-2.4.18-i386.config config file
> installed by the stock kernel-source-2.4.18-5.rpm.
>
> I did the following:
> # cd /usr/src/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 June 2002 10:27 pm, John Telford wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thanks for reminding me to make mrproper.
You''ll need to 'make oldconfig' after copying the config file, I believe.
- --
- -Michael
pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpg
Hello
Thanks for reminding me to make mrproper.
...John
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:20:14PM -0400, Michael Fratoni wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 20 June 2002 03:44 pm, John Telford wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm having difficulties compiling the Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 20 June 2002 03:44 pm, John Telford wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm having difficulties compiling the Red Hat 2.4.18-5 kernel. I'm
> using the stock /usr/src/linux-2.4/configs/kernel-2.4.18-i386.config
> config file installed by the stock kernel-s
Hello
I'm having difficulties compiling the Red Hat 2.4.18-5 kernel. I'm
using the stock /usr/src/linux-2.4/configs/kernel-2.4.18-i386.config
config file installed by the stock kernel-source-2.4.18-5.rpm.
I did the following:
# cd /usr/src/
# ll linux-2.4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 J
do make mrproper BUT before you do copy your config file i think it is ( sorry
in windows right now can't check ) somewhere else so not overwritten...then copy
it back and start again..
hth's
lee
Andy Worthington wrote:
> I am having trouble compiling a new kernel. This is a fresh install of
I am having trouble compiling a new kernel. This is a fresh install of
redhat 7.0. I downloaded all the rpms at updates.redhat.com/7.0/i386/ I
ran rpm -Fvh on all of them except the kernel ones because I want to stay
with 2.2.16 at the moment. I then tried compiling the kernel with `make
menuc
1 12:06 PM
Subject: RE: kernel compile problems
> OK people - how many times do we have to say this:
> SEARCH THE ARCHIVES!!
> This question has been answered (literally) hundreds of times by now.
>
> Andy: Use kgcc instead of gcc is the official answer. Unofficially i
thin
hould work.
Warren Melnick
Director of Research and Development
Astata Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Andy Worthington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel compile problems
I am having trouble compiling a
I am having trouble compiling a new kernel. This is a fresh install of
redhat 7.0. I downloaded all the rpms at updates.redhat.com/7.0/i386/ I
ran rpm -Fvh on all of them except the kernel ones because I want to stay
with 2.2.16 at the moment. I then tried compiling the kernel with `make
menuc
shortly after I sent this, I tried a make mrproper oldconfig dep and then
it magically worked. The mrproper seems to have done it, since I checked
another 7.0 box (upgraded not clean install) with the same problem, and it
fixed it there too - without changing the Makefile.
I guess the list server
I'm having the same problem. I changed the CC definition to use kgcc
(which is installed), even though mine had some logic that should have
resulted in the same thing anyway, and it made no difference.
What else can I check?
kernelcfg-0.6-9
kernel-headers-2.4.0-0.26
kernel-2.2.16-22
kernel-util
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mr FW User wrote:
> Hi. I've just installed 7.0 on a blank disk and now
> understand there is a 'kgcc' that must be used to
> compile the kernel. I removed gcc and linked kgcc to
I have a question. Where did 'kgcc' come from? The
core kernel development group, or did it co
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 11:57:24PM -0400, Statux wrote:
: gcc is your standard issue C compiler. Have you ever compiled a kernel
: from tarball?
What he's saying here is that the stock gcc in 7.0 blows up on compiling
kernel 2.2.x, as it is gcc 2.96. This same problem existed with the 2.0
kernel
gcc is your standard issue C compiler. Have you ever compiled a kernel
from tarball?
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Mr FW User wrote:
> > You should be using cc or gcc to compile anything on
> > a redhat system... including the kernel.
>
> Well, apparently this kgcc is specifically designed to
> compile
> You should be using cc or gcc to compile anything on
> a redhat system... including the kernel.
Well, apparently this kgcc is specifically designed to
compile the kernel, due to it being a new version, I
think?
So you're able to compile the kernel using:
cpp-2.96-54
kernel-2.2.16-22
glibc-2.1
ECTED]
Subject: Kernel compile problems
Hi. I've just installed 7.0 on a blank disk and now
understand there is a 'kgcc' that must be used to
compile the kernel. I removed gcc and linked kgcc to
gcc and cc in /usr/bin. Now, I'm receiving the
following assembly errors:
cc -D__
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 06:45:25PM -0700, Mr FW User wrote:
: Hi. I've just installed 7.0 on a blank disk and now
: understand there is a 'kgcc' that must be used to
: compile the kernel. I removed gcc and linked kgcc to
: gcc and cc in /usr/bin. Now, I'm receiving the
: following assembly errors:
> What's going on? The kernel compiles okay, but this
> doesn't give me the warm-and-fuzzy... Why does this
> seem so half-assed?
You should be using cc or gcc to compile anything on a redhat
system... including the kernel.
___
Redhat-list mailing li
Hi. I've just installed 7.0 on a blank disk and now
understand there is a 'kgcc' that must be used to
compile the kernel. I removed gcc and linked kgcc to
gcc and cc in /usr/bin. Now, I'm receiving the
following assembly errors:
cc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> %-> I have a program that fails to compile. It reports:
> %->
> %->/usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or
> %-> directory
> %->
> %-> If course, it's right. Was the headers rpm file supposed to create a
> %-> symlink somewhere
%-> I have a program that fails to compile. It reports:
%->
%-> /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or
%-> directory
%->
%-> If course, it's right. Was the headers rpm file supposed to create a
%-> symlink somewhere, but didn't?
I had the same problem when I attempted
> "taj" == Todd A Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
taj> I have a program that fails to compile. It reports:
taj> /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or
taj> directory
This is a commonly asked question and must be in the RedHat archieve, check
to see if you have gl
I have a program that fails to compile. It reports:
/usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or
directory
If course, it's right. Was the headers rpm file supposed to create a
symlink somewhere, but didn't?
--
Todd A. Jacobs
Senior Network Consultant
--
To unsubscr
I downloaded the latest release of hf-lab via
freshmeat today. It calls for gd >= 1.6. I
have installed gd version 1.7.3 so I meet this
part. When I run configure, first I see:
checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet... no
checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet_stub... no
What is -ldnet and what package
I didnt recall any problem with the qt-1.44 rpm (I didnt compile from
source) under RH6.1 but
I encountered the same problems in compiling licq (which needs qt-1.44
devel and blah) too.
What I did then was to go into the sourcecodes and appended the path
there(/qt-1.44)
Monitors are ex$$ :) du
Gah!! I am going nuts trying to work this out.
I have recently reinstalled RH 6.0 on my box and
have been upgrading to the latest 6.1 since.
The problem I am running into is in compiling
qt and kde. First, I installed the RH qt1x-1.44
rpm and the devel rpm. I also installed the
RH qt-2.0.2 r
40 matches
Mail list logo
