On Tue, 9 May 2000, Michael Ghens wrote:
>Do this if you are brave.
That's not a problem. I do all my install trials on my home PC, which is
a mirror of the server, before trying it on the server.
>For /usr/local/bin/perl5, do:
>
>cd /usr/local/bin
>ln -s /usr/bin/perl perl5
Didn't work.
>
7;
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 21:08:20 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Glen Lee Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Can't install Apache-SSL
> Resent-Date: 9 May 2000 03:01:02 -
&g
>> Still no luck:
>>
>> $ rpm -i --force apache-ssl-1.3.6_1.35-3.i386.rpm
>> error: failed dependencies:
>> /usr/local/bin/perl5 is needed by apache-ssl-1.3.6_1.35-3
>>
>> Then I created a hard link from /usr/local/bin/perl to /usr/bin/perl but
>> received the same error message.
>>
>>
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2000, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> >Sounds like someone goofed when making the RPM. There may be some examples
> >scripts that have perl in /usr/local/bin (standard place for it.) instead
> >of /usr/bin (RedHat's location.) This is
On Mon, 8 May 2000, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>Sounds like someone goofed when making the RPM. There may be some examples
>scripts that have perl in /usr/local/bin (standard place for it.) instead
>of /usr/bin (RedHat's location.) This is one case where you should be safe
>in using the --force
At 09:08 PM 5/8/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm trying to install Apache-SSL and am getting the following error
>message:
>
>$ rpm -i apache-ssl-1.3.6_1.35-3.i386.rpm
>error: failed dependencies:
>/usr/local/bin/perl5 is needed by apache-ssl-1.3.6_1.35-3
>
>I've installed mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.12-1.
I'm trying to install Apache-SSL and am getting the following error
message:
$ rpm -i apache-ssl-1.3.6_1.35-3.i386.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
/usr/local/bin/perl5 is needed by apache-ssl-1.3.6_1.35-3
I've installed mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.12-1.i586.rpm and
openssl-0.9.4-2.i386.rpm. This
