I too have been looking for AT form Pentium II motherboards.
(I want to keep my server tower -- lots of space for internal
peripherals.) I was planning to get the Supermicro
Super P6DLF -- A FULL AT size dual Pentium II motherboard
5 PCI, 3 ISA and AGP.
Anyone have any experience with this boa
Thanks , thats good news
One of the reasonds I havnt upgraded to Pentium with ATX is that I really like my old
case.
A beautiful work of art, full tower with copper fingers all around the joint of cover
to chasis. :-)
Phil
Bryan Swann wrote:
> Phil,
>
> I had to do some searching, but I did find
Phil,
I had to do some searching, but I did find three AT Pentium II motherboards.
Although, I did have to upgrade my memory. I selected a Gigabyte 686BLX
motherboard. The only problem so far is that this board only has two ISA slots; the
rest are PCI. I think the oter two AT boards were from
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, Phil Risby wrote:
> Thats a valid commetnt, but I was wondering abput yourt upgrades?
> Doesnt the Pll use and ATX m/b and need an ATX case?
Not necessarily. There's no direct correlation between PII's and ATX.
ATX and AT are both available for all modern CPU's.
--
PL
Bryan Swann wrote:
> >From what I understand, the Pentium II and Pentium Prp are very similar.
> Except, the Pentium II runs older 16bit applications faster. I don't see any
> new Pentium Pro processors being developed, so I would go with a Pentium II. I
> just upgraded a 486 to a Pentium II wi
>From what I understand, the Pentium II and Pentium Prp are very similar.
Except, the Pentium II runs older 16bit applications faster. I don't see any
new Pentium Pro processors being developed, so I would go with a Pentium II. I
just upgraded a 486 to a Pentium II with 64MB of RAM for just over
Whoa there, a PPro is far superior to a PII.. I have compared them, PII
is nothing. I would get the PPro ( I would have if I didn't need 95)
B.
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Phil Risby wrote:
|Hi everyone
|
|I know this is not redHat specific but I am thinking of upgrading.
|I am trying to fin
On Tue, 7 Apr 1998, Phil Risby wrote:
> I am trying to find out if the Pentium ll series wuld be a better bet
> to say a Pentium Pro 200
The only advantages to the Pentium II is the megahertz speed and the MMX.
Since Linux doesn't use the MMX (in fact practically nobody uses the MMX
due to Intel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pentium Pro's still go for very large amounts (they haven't really droped
in price). You can get a 233mhz pentium II for cheaper (maybe even
faster). The reason being, the only people left (for the most part of
course) that use pentium pro's are the o
Hi everyone
I know this is not redHat specific but I am thinking of upgrading.
I am trying to find out if the Pentium ll series wuld be a better bet
to say a Pentium Pro 200
bearing in mind that
1) Pentium Pro is dying out
2) Pentium ll go upto what is ti now 400 Mhz?
3) Pentium Pro is a neat chi
10 matches
Mail list logo