On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 01:09, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> lists wrote:
> > One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in
> > the sshd pam configuration.
> >
> > #%PAM-1.0
> > #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> > auth required pam_nologin.so
>
lists wrote:
One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in
the sshd pam configuration.
#%PAM-1.0
#auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
auth required pam_nologin.so
accountrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth
password required
Meant to send this to the list :
Be interesting to see what forwarding does to the threading.
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 18:09, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> On 05 Sep 2003 17:58:37 -0500
> Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I don't know what the recourse would be if I were to really raise h
Sean Estabrooks wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:05:24 -0400
lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in
the sshd pam configuration.
#%PAM-1.0
#auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
auth required pam_nologi
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 15:39, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> No, it pisses me off, as well. I just haven't had the time to complain to
> RedHat that they've royally messed up all of my logs. I'm also hoping and
> praying that RH 10 will fix this problem...
Me as well. When these frigging "NON BUGS
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 19:05:24 -0400
lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One work around that I have found is to comment out the first line in
> the sshd pam configuration.
>
> #%PAM-1.0
> #auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
> auth required pam_nologin.so
> account
On 05 Sep 2003 17:58:37 -0500
Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what the recourse would be if I were to really raise hell.
> It appears that the maintainer of RH packages has the power to declare
> issues NOTABUG and I do not know the procedure to go over them.
>
> I pleaded
pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired pam_limits.so
sessionoptional pam_console.so
Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
wondering about the 'authenticati
Ignore the previous post. The system ignores it..
Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to
happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in
messages file and I'm
> > > wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to
> > > happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in
> > > normally with no problem. Can we change some setting to make this go
> > >
from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to
happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in
normally with no problem. Can we change some setting to make this go
away?
As far as I know the only w
> > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
> > wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to
> > happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in
> > normally with no problem. Can we change
On 05 Sep 2003 16:30:03 -0500
Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:10, Peter Fleck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
> > wondering about the 'authentication failure&
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 13:10, Peter Fleck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
> wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to
> happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in
&
Hi,
Following are two entries from our /var/log/messages file and I'm
wondering about the 'authentication failure' part. This seems to
happen with every login, at least remote, although the user logs in
normally with no problem. Can we change some setting to make this go
away
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I updated a server with the openssh errata for valhalla today and now when I
log in I see this in the logs:
sshd(pam_unix)[14785]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=NODEVssh
ruser= rhost=x user=xx
sshd
Title: Authentication failure logs with LDAP
I'm setting up a RedHat machine using OpenLDAP to authenticate with a Solaris Iplanet LDAP server. I've used authconfig to set up the initial configuration, and I'm able to successfully login to the system with LDAP users. The
, April 11, 2001 5:14
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Authentication
failure when logging in by telnet
Hi,
Im having a problem with my linux box and would
appreciate any help.
To cut a long story short, when i telnet to the
box i get the login and password prompt but authentication
Message -
From: Ioannis Chazakis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 4:13 PM
Subject: Authentication failure when logging in by telnet
Hi,
Im having a problem with my linux box and would appreciate any help.
To cut a long story short, when i telnet to the box i get the login
At 12:13 AM 4/12/2001 +0300, you wrote:
>Hi,
>Im having a problem with my linux box and would appreciate any help.
>To cut a long story short, when i telnet to the box i get the login and password
>prompt but authentication fails for all users.
>When I ftp to the box, authentiction succeeds for a
Hi,
Im having a problem with my linux box and would
appreciate any help.
To cut a long story short, when i telnet to the box
i get the login and password prompt but authentication fails for all
users.
When I ftp to the box, authentiction succeeds for
all users as it should.
Any pointers to w
not work.
Thanks,
Marco
--
> From: Marco Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Authentication failure
> Date: October 5, 2000 8:36 AM
>
> system: RedHat 6.2 x86
>
> Since yesterday, in multi-user mode, I can n
what does the "hostname" command return?
kf
--
My recommendation: Don't shop at Explorer Micro, Columbus, Ohio.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Marco Shaw wrote:
= system: RedHat 6.2 x86
=
= Since yesterday, in multi-user mode, I can no longer authenticate any
= users. All login attempts result in 'l
Hi Marco,
99% chance you were hacked. This is a common "feature" of a rootkit.
You will likely need to reinstall, or start looking for the files that were
replaced and reinstall the packages necessary.
You can figure out if you've been hacked by checking to see if you've
upgraded ALL of the err
On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Marco Shaw spewed into the bitstream:
MS>system: RedHat 6.2 x86
MS>
MS>Since yesterday, in multi-user mode, I can no longer authenticate any
MS>users. All login attempts result in 'login failure'. Strangely,
MS>/var/adm/messages does not indicate any failures from PAM.
MS>
M
system: RedHat 6.2 x86
Since yesterday, in multi-user mode, I can no longer authenticate any
users. All login attempts result in 'login failure'. Strangely,
/var/adm/messages does not indicate any failures from PAM.
In single user-mode, I have no problems su'ing from and to any user. I've
'ze
: PAP Authentication Failure
Im glad there was a link:
http://www.unixworld.com/uworld/archives/97/tutorial/015/015.html
because it answered my frustration with ppp2.3.3 and Redhat 5.
Its also an excellent resource (and your page too) :-)...
Richard Lorbieski
Alpha1 Internet
-Original Me
It still not quite a clean html page but it's there.
http://www.valleynet.bc.ca/~dan/autoppp.html
Dan
At 01:12 AM 3/18/98 -0500, Canary, Robert W. wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I had this working fine in RHD 4.2 ...
>
>I have my Linux box setup for dialin access using PPP/PAP. I can dial
Hi,
I had this working fine in RHD 4.2 ...
I have my Linux box setup for dialin access using PPP/PAP. I can dial in
and logon into a terminal screen, but if I try to connect with PPP/PAP the
PAP authentication fails, that is the exact message I get in my log files.
The mgetty log f
29 matches
Mail list logo
