When I built Apache from the RH 5 SRPM I commented out this line in the
Makefile so it would link:
#LIBS1= -ldbm
And added these to EXTRA_LIBS to get it to link:
EXTRA_LIBS= -lgdbm -lcrypt
Is this evil?
Thanks,
Chris
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCH
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Ross Camm wrote:
> Got it !
> It seems Apache 1.2.5 doen't want to know about direcories if they are
> executable, even if no ececutables reside in the directory. Make the
> directores +x and all works fine ..!
>
> Rossco
If i'm reading that r
Got it !
It seems Apache 1.2.5 doen't want to know about direcories if they are
executable, even if no ececutables reside in the directory. Make the
directores +x and all works fine ..!
Rossco
At 11:03 AM 5/4/98 +1000, you wrote:
>We run Redhat 5.0. Just upgraded to apache 1.2.5. with
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Ross Camm wrote:
> We run Redhat 5.0. Just upgraded to apache 1.2.5. with the rpm
>
> Now it seems nobody can access any sub directorys of our main document
> directory. Access is ok to the documents directorybut not its sub
> directorys ( where eveythin
We run Redhat 5.0. Just upgraded to apache 1.2.5. with the rpm
Now it seems nobody can access any sub directorys of our main document
directory. Access is ok to the documents directorybut not its sub
directorys ( where eveything is )
Apache reports the informative 403 access forbidden
I upgraded Apache to 1.2.5. Then I installed the 3/13/98 Frontpage
Extensions for Apache 1.2.5. Now everything is screwed. All correct
permissions are gone. When I change them back I still keep running into new
problems. The latest is that FP from my 95 client is looking for shtml.exe
in each
