I have a Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 and have been trying to use the latest cvs of
emu10k1 to get it to work. I am almost there, but have one question.
I can hear sound from the digital port through the analog speakers, but cannot hear
anything out of the analog port (3rd from the firewire
ilto:jamesredhatlist@;tnjinfl.com]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:19 AM
To: redhat
Subject: Almost there... (getting rid of spam)
I have MailScanner
working with SpamAssassin/F-Prot and Sendmail as the MTA.
One problem I'm having is getting changes to take affect. For example, I
had @hotmail.co
I posted these questions to MailScanner's mailing list yesterday but
have not received any responses. (actually I haven't received anything
from that list so I'm not sure what's wrong.) Anyway I have MailScanner
working with SpamAssassin/F-Prot and Sendmail as the MTA.
One problem I'm having is g
Thanks Bret. What I did doesent help.But I have 2
kernel versions installed, and the one (2.4.7-10)
that comes with my redhat 7.2, and which I've not edit
the source code, your link resolve it.
But the other kernel I have (2.4.18) doesent work with
this description. And I have set
CONFIG_BLOCK_DE
At 18:05 2000-07-06 -0400, Bruce Embrey wrote:
>You don't have to settle for an external modem if you prefer the internal
>models. Zoom makes a nice 56K internal modem that is NOT a winmodem. It has
>jumpers on it and you can set the irq as well as disable PNP feature.
I prefer external beacuse t
t Ave.
Frederick, Md. 21701
301-696-3927
- Original Message -
From: "John Aldrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: Help, new user -> Almost!
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Johan Lim wrote:
> > Thanks f
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Johan Lim wrote:
> Thanks for all the comments & suggestions about my problem. I've got some
> clues now. My modem is winmodem and from http://www.linmodems.org I got the
> driver for my winmodem.
>
> I've installed the driver and it can detect my winmodem. When I try Inter
Thanks for all the comments & suggestions about my problem. I've got some
clues now. My modem is winmodem and from http://www.linmodems.org I got the
driver for my winmodem.
I've installed the driver and it can detect my winmodem. When I try Internet
connection using Dial up configuration tool
Well, I seem to have solved most of my problems by installing RH 6.2 from
CD. It was a very easy and clean install. A lot of things are the way I
want them without compiling a new kernel and it doesn't look like I need
to.
However, there are a couple minor glitches: 1) sound doesn't work
yet, wa
A special thanks go out to:
Peter Blomgren
Michael J. McGillick
Charles Galpin
Rick Forrister
Hopefully, I have not missed any contributors or mistyped their names.
Thankyou gentlemen for your help and patience. And a special thanks to
Peter for tackling the confused initial request. I was co
I think I've almost got pppd 2.3.x demand dial working, but I'm fuzzy on
the details.
I found the following on Deja News, and I'm wondering if someone can
clarify exactly where the call to /usr/sbin/pppd is supposed to go. I tried
sticking it in /etc/rd.c/rc.local but chat ch
Awhile back I kinda messed up my symlinks to X, therefore rendering it
useless. Someone I completely lost startx, nothing worked, etc etc etc.
So, I just pulled all my X stuff out (rpm -e) and grabbed the latest
from the hurricane/contrib at redhat (yes I'm running 5.0). I alse need
the SuSE serve
172.16.0.0 to 172.31.0.0
Dave Wreski wrote:
>
> > > You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is
> > > assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions
> > > (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look
> > > up RFC1918
> >>I am using the standard bogus IP addresses
> >>198.168.16.2 and 198.168.16.1 for my two machines with user names
> >>I use a netmask of 255.255.255.0 for both machines.
>
> How about 192.168.1.0 or 10.0.0.0 not 192.168.16.0
What's wrong with 192.168.16.x ? The RFC lists everything in
192.
> > You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is
> > assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions
> > (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look
> > up RFC1918 for details. (I know, because I made the same mistake)
On 28 Apr, Ed Jaeger wrote:
> You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is
> assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions
> (http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look
> up RFC1918 for details. (I know, because I mad
Well I almost have it :-)I changed the IRQ on one of the hosts machines
and lo and behold I can ping in both directions with no dropped packets.
However: I can only telnet or rlogin in one dirrection. when I telnet or
rlogin from abraham.localdomain.nevada I can log on to
> 2. rename the hosts adding a domain to the names
Using .nevada as a domain isn't such a good idea. That won't work for
DNS, for example, and is really nonconventional. Consider ".nevada.org".
> Now in all cases when I ping from either machine I always get a network
> unreachable error
Wha
Dave Wreski wrote:
> > Hi, I have added a route to the network since the last post.
> > Unfortunately I can transmit packets all day long, but I still cannot
> > recieve them on a local host.
>
> What do you mean a "local host"? Do you mean a host on the same network?
> If so, then you have corr
> Hi, I have added a route to the network since the last post.
> Unfortunately I can transmit packets all day long, but I still cannot
> recieve them on a local host.
What do you mean a "local host"? Do you mean a host on the same network?
If so, then you have correctly added a route to your lo
Hi, I have added a route to the network since the last post. Unfortunately
I can transmit packets all day long, but I still cannot recieve them on a local
host. -- I used 3c5x9setup.c to move the irq on one card from 10 to 11.
I noticed at boot time that the card is still seen by the bios as a p
You should probably use the 192.168.16.0 network, since 198.168.16.0 is
assigned to the Canadian Inspector General of Financial Institutions
(http://rs.arin.net/cgi-bin/arinwhois.pl?arinwhoisquery=198.168.16). Look
up RFC1918 for details. (I know, because I made the same mistake))
Ed Jaeger, CFO
> I am using the standard bogus IP addresses
> 198.168.16.2 and 198.168.16.1 for my two machines with user names
> joseph.localdomain
> and abraham.localdomain respectively.
Where have you specified this information?
> However when I try to connect to either machine from it's partner using
>
Jimbo,
I had the same problem you had and it turned out to be a
3com509
conflict. Like I belive I was trying to use address x300 on the card and as
soon as I tried x340 on the card it worked. Linux found the card and
everything looked ok but there was a hardware conflict
hello: -- I have been trying to get ethernet networking up for the last couple
of days.
Currently I have compilied the kernal for ethernet support and 3 com support for
my
3c509b cards. -- Now the kernal sees the cards at boot up properly. In addition
I have
configured the host tables and the e
Hi all,
I have a / filesystem that is getting *really* close
to full and I cannot find the culprit/problem.
I've gone to single user mode a couple of times and
umounted all filesystems to look for "gremlins" under
the mount points and all is clean. fsck'd OK.
Upgraded fileutils.rpm just in cas
Ok, now the messages are getting sent; however, look at my post. Exmh is
putting the To: field in the From: field on the the list.
At least in exmh on my machine.
What did I do wrong? Followed the other post about editing MH and sendmail.cf
Now, I can send mail with sendmail on my local mac
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 15:23:21 +0100
From: Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andreas Hirczy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [SOLVED] (almost...) lpd and remote users failure
Please, can you post the following to the list? My newsserv
>by part updates on people's machines. If everyone who is subscribed to
>this list sent in their machine configurations (and changes as they
>happen) the traffic on this list would be unbelievable.
By the way, Mike, how many people *are* subscribed to redhat-list?
DL
--
PLEASE read the R
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998 20:19:28 -0500 (EST), "Douglas F. Elznic" wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Robert Hailman wrote:
>> >>524 GB Hard Drive
>> ^^
>> WOW!!!
>> Oops. Thanks for pointing that out. I meant 524 MB.
>Once again I am not very interested in what your machine is like. Maybe we
>coul
On Wed, 18 Mar 1998, Robert Hailman wrote:
> >>524 GB Hard Drive
> ^^
> WOW!!!
> Oops. Thanks for pointing that out. I meant 524 MB.
Once again I am not very interested in what your machine is like. Maybe we
could ask redhat to setup a linux-o-tron-66 mailing list. It would be a
great way
>Isn't that a hell of a big hard disk?
>>524 GB Hard Drive
^^
WOW!!!
Oops. Thanks for pointing that out. I meant 524 MB.
/-\
|/---+---\|
|| Robert Hailman |Stupidity is Win95,||
||
> Is there anyway to give a user the same capabilities as root without
giving the root password?
The sudo package is what you want:
http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/
DL
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat
Check out "sudo"
you can configure specific users to specific functions
via the /etc/sudoers file.
rpms available
Rick
--
Rick L. Mantooth[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.why.net/users/rickdman/index.html
We have enough youth, how about a fountain of "Smart."
--
PLEASE read the
At 06:52 AM 3/18/98 +0500, Junaid Pirzada wrote:
>Please stop sending emails to this address
>Thanx
Try this
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
Ken Arc
At 05:51 PM 3/17/98 -0800, you wrote:
Is there anyway to give a user the same capabilities as root without giving the root password?
You could add them to your root group (in /etc/group) and make sure you have group permissions set to allow group whatever..
Not the greatest from a security
Please stop sending emails to this address
Thanx
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe"
Is there anyway to give a user the same
capabilities as root without giving the root
password?
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Robert Hailman wrote:
> >>Hello... As you may know, I am building a computer, which I call the
> >>Linux-O-Tron 66.
> >
> >Do we really need to know this?
> >
> Yes
I hate to sound arrogant but what makes you think that I care about your
computer? I would rather know about som
Isn't that a hell of a big hard disk?
>Hello... As you may know, I am building a computer, which I call the
>Linux-O-Tron 66.
>It is almost complete, with the final cables being added as we speak. Here
>are the up-to-the-minute stats on the Linux-O-Tron 66:
>
>486DX2/66
>>Hello... As you may know, I am building a computer, which I call the
>>Linux-O-Tron 66.
>
>Do we really need to know this?
>
Yes
/-\
|/---+---\|
|| Robert Hailman |Stupidity is Win95,||
||
>Hello... As you may know, I am building a computer, which I call the
>Linux-O-Tron 66.
Do we really need to know this?
>/-\
>|/---+---\|
>|| Robert Hailman |Stupidity is Win95,||
>||
Hello... As you may know, I am building a computer, which I call the
Linux-O-Tron 66.
It is almost complete, with the final cables being added as we speak. Here
are the up-to-the-minute stats on the Linux-O-Tron 66:
486DX2/66 w/8MB ram
524 GB Hard Drive
1 3.5" floppy drive
1 4X CD-Rom Dr
43 matches
Mail list logo
