And thats the beauty of linux. We all have a choice and I choose to use a
well known, time tested compiler. And yes, you can build 2.2.16 with gcc
2.95, i have done it myself many times.
Jason
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Jason Holland wrote:
>
> > http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kerne
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Jason Holland wrote:
> http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0009.3/1157.html
>
> and follow the thread around. The gotcha page says
I've seen that thread before. It does not relate to compiling kernel 2.4
with gcc 2.96 at all. You might also notice that Ala
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Corisen wrote:
> i've manged to successfully compile 2.4.0-test10 kernel. however, upon
> startup there are some failed/error messages:
I have working RPMs (Red Hat style with advanced router) at
ftp://duke.eburg.com/pub/linux/redhat-7.x-mycontrib/
Try installing them and se
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0009.3/1157.html
and follow the thread around. The gotcha page says
"This information only applies to pristine source, downloaded from a site
such as kernel.org, as the changes necessary to compile have already been
made to the source from the
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Jason Holland wrote:
> The known issues are documented in emails on the Linux Kernel mailing list.
> gcc 2.96 is a snapshot of a development version of gcc 3.0. If you read
> this
>
> http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/gotchas/7.0/gotchas-7-6.html#ss6.1
That "gotcha" is wi
The known issues are documented in emails on the Linux Kernel mailing list.
gcc 2.96 is a snapshot of a development version of gcc 3.0. If you read
this
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/gotchas/7.0/gotchas-7-6.html#ss6.1
Redhat recommends using kgcc to build kernels. I seriously doubt they a
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Jason Holland wrote:
> there are many known issues when compiling 2.4 kernels with gcc 2.96. In
> other words, don't do it.
And where are these documented? Red Hat is intentionally building their
2.4 kernels with gcc 2.96. I built mine this way as well, and have not
yet s
the kgcc rpm included with rh 7.0 is egcs. there are no other changes
required, other than changing all the gcc instances in Makefile to kgcc.
Jason
>
>
> i'm using modutils 2.3.14 (comes with RH7). i've downloaded the egcs1.1.2
> file. do u suggest that install egcs1.1.2 or use kgcc? how can i
i'm using modutils 2.3.14 (comes with RH7). i've downloaded the egcs1.1.2
file. do u suggest that install egcs1.1.2 or use kgcc? how can i patch
egcs to lastest 1.1.2 version using .diff file provided? if using kgcc,
what changes/command shout i run to make dep & bzImage? your help is
really a
Well, the CC line needs to be kgcc instead of gcc. I think there are 2
references to it.
Jason
>
> thanks for the advice. what changes must be made in the Makefile
> and other
> files in order to use kgcc instead of gcc 2.96?
>
>
> Quoting Jason Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > What version o
thanks for the advice. what changes must be made in the Makefile and other
files in order to use kgcc instead of gcc 2.96?
Quoting Jason Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What version of modutils are you using? Take a look at
> Documentation/Changes in your 2.4 source tree, it lists some
> impo
ect: 2.4.0-test10 kernel compilation
hi,
i'm currently running RH7, with 2.2.16-22 kernel, gcc 2.96 on a Sharp Actius
250 notebook.
i've manged to successfully compile 2.4.0-test10 kernel. however, upon
startup there are some failed/error messages:
1. finding module dependencies: depmod **
What version of modutils are you using? Take a look at
Documentation/Changes in your 2.4 source tree, it lists some important
information about software versions when running the 2.4 kernels. Also,
there are many known issues when compiling 2.4 kernels with gcc 2.96. In
other words, don't do it
hi,
i'm currently running RH7, with 2.2.16-22 kernel, gcc 2.96 on a Sharp Actius
250 notebook.
i've manged to successfully compile 2.4.0-test10 kernel. however, upon
startup there are some failed/error messages:
1. finding module dependencies: depmod *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.0-
14 matches
Mail list logo
