le" is for IBM to buy SCO outright.
Again, I hope they're full of crap - but it's possible they're not.
Some interesting stuff here
http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/2003/07/News91.html
regis
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
postfix + Courier Imap as someone told me here days
> ago.
>
> Thanks everyone for comments
>
> Fryclau:
>
For what it's worth, we use qmail & pop3d,and use vpopmail for domain management.
It authenticates with mysql. For webmail I like sqwebmail, but others
prefer
don't
> want to use a preprocessor like prec of Just Logic, but if it doesn't
> have any other choice them I'll try the MySQL++ so. Can anybody help me,
> or tell me about an mail list or forum about MySQL with C/C++.
>
> Thanks.
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 07:38, dlangschied wrote:
> What is webmin?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> David Langschied
web based admin tool for unix and linux type systems - works great
http://www.webmin.com/
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/list
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 15:05, Lazor, Ed wrote:
> Know of any good mailing lists for C Programming on RedHat
A great resource for C and C++ programming. Some of these guys are
really good.
http://www.cprogramming.com/board.html
I've never found anything specific to Redhat in C programming - t
le of days. I've had this problem before when
DNS gets turned off, then when they reinstate it the entries are screwed
up.
I'd suggest checking the domain usint the tools at
http://www.dnsreport.com/
it will tell you exactly what the root and name server entries are and
if ther
I've
> tried only lets me see page one.
I use Gnu-Halifax viewer and it works very well.
http://www.gnome.org/softwaremap/projects/halifax/
regis
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Le 11/06/2003 11:48, « Anton Piatek » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On that note, i want to do the same...
>
> are there any easier alternatives to sendmail that are easier to set up, and
> still reliable?
>
> Anton
You could take a look at qmail http://www.qmail.org/top.html
It's not exact
mpatible with Opera. I ended up
downloading a new motif rpm and installed it - then Opera installed with
no problem.
Maybe someone else has a better idea.
regis
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
roponent of
running my own mail server (I prefer qmail), I've got to ask; What do
you gain by running Sendmail, and just dumping it off to your ISP's
smtp?
Wouldn't it be faster, easier, safer to just use a mail client?
just curious
regis
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
t show up in MAPS or
> > SPEWS, but my mail is still rejected from aol.
>
> Really? Have you checked DULS?
Yes,
And so far as I can tell, only aol has routinely bounced our mail.
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
AOL use this list.
>
While they may be running MAPS or SPEWS also, what they are doing here
is different. They are blocking (as explained to me) ALL IP's that
they've defined as "residential." My IP doesn't show up in MAPS or
SPEWS, but my mail is still rejec
something wrong.
For what it's worth, I'm not violating my TOS agreement, by running a mail server.
regis
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
the few times I send to aol, it'll be ok to risk the long
queue times.
thanks for the post
regis
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 01:14, Linux Tard wrote:
> Regis
>
> did you ever try to specify a backup superblock? That
> might have solved it for you. This would have been
> the '-b' option.
>
> lt
>
>
Yup lt, sure did. Even went through archives to find different backup
superblocks. Like I sa
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 18:25, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 12:29 16 Jun 2003, rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Just to complete this thread. I solved this problem in a much simpler
> | way. After some additional searching on Googly Groups, I tried running
> | fsck -A /dev/hda2 a
chille,
Thanks so much for your input.
Just to complete this thread. I solved this problem in a much simpler
way. After some additional searching on Googly Groups, I tried running
fsck -A /dev/hda2 and answered yes to all the questions. When I exited
and rebooted, it started - good as new!
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 15:58, achillemiele wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2003 22:44, rm wrote:
>
> > This could be a problem. The complete line when I do cat /etc/fstab
> >
> > dev/hda5swapswapdefaults0 0
> >
> > does this mean I&#
On Saturday 14 June 2003 21:24, rm wrote:
> Any ideas on how to correct the corrupt superblock, or otherwise
correct
> this?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> regis
What's your complete recorf i /etc/fstab?
/dev/hda5 ???
Is it a ext2 or ext3 filesystem?
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 13:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday 14 June 2003 19:46, rm wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply. Obviously I'm not so sharp on picking up which
> > drive is which. I ran e2fsck -f -c /dev/hda5
> > and got the following response:
> >
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 11:08, regis wrote:
On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 10:51, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:40:09AM -0500, rm wrote:
> >
> > LABEL=/
> > LABEL=/boot
> > /dev/fd0
> > none
> > none
> > /dev/hda5
> > /dev/cdrom
&g
g fsck.auto for /dev/fd)
Any idea what the fsck I did wrong here?
thanks,
regis
--
rm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
22 matches
Mail list logo
