--- Rick van der Linde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> >Im using vmware Workstation 3.0
>
> >> What version of vmware are you running?
> >>
> >> Version 2.x will not work with XP. You must
> upgrade
> >> to version 3.x
> >>
> >> Haven't tried it myself (yet) but that's what
> their
> >> t
Hi,
Im using vmware Workstation 3.0
Thanks.
--- Frank Carreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What version of vmware are you running?
>
> Version 2.x will not work with XP. You must upgrade
> to version 3.x
>
> Haven't tried it myself (yet) but that's what their
> tech support told
> me. app
Hello,
I'm running vmware under Linux(rh 7.2), while trying
to boout up windows XP from a raw disk. Vmware starts
up and initializes the memory just fine, but hangs at
install stage 2 of GRUB. Anyone else had this problem?
If so, pointers to any solutions would be appreciated.
Thanks.
_
Hello,
I'm about to install Linux on my laptop which runs
Windows XP as of now. However, does anyone know if it
is possible to boot my already installed Windows XP
from Vmware running on Linux? The reason I ask this
question is that Vmware might report pseudo hardware
information to XP and this m
You can only get the MAC address of another machine if
it is on the same network segment as yours, ie if it
is on your LAN and if you dont have to pass through a
gateway to get to it. That said, if it is in your
network segment, just ping it and look up the arp
entry by running the 'arp' program(a
Try 'netsat', I think the -p option lets you see the
process that is using the port.
For quick check, you can just "telnet 127.0.0.1 139"
to see if some process is listening on that port.
--- Hidong Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How do I check if something's running on port 139 of
>
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If one were to move from, say, Red Hat to another
> distro, what would be
> > the most similar, and easiest to accomplish?
>
> That's a very inapproriate question on this list.
>
> --
> Tron
ins/IPTables rulesets, route tables, etc?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kevin
>
> nit etc wrote:
>
> >
> > > Example:
> > >
> > > if0 encounters a packet for 192.168.1.3. The
> mask
> > > on if0 tells the ip
> > > stack that 192.168.
Kevin,
--- Kevin Holmquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nit,
>
> Your thinking and that's good!
>
> I'm not sure if you see the whole picture though.
>
> route table: (using cisr for brevity
> 255.255.255.255= /32 255.255.255.0
> =/24)
>
> 192.168.1.1/32 if0
> 192.168.1.2/32 if1
> 192.168.1.3
ress for months
at a time.
> I think you're fibbing; this is really a research
> paper, isn't it?
>
> :-}
Not really, I graduated a while ago.
>
> - -d
>
>
> nit etc wrote:
>
> >I was suggesting routing between two different
> >netwo
> would either never get to 192.168.0.247 or the
> router would see two
> valid routes.
In my table above, the broadcast traffic will goto all
hosts 192.168.1.1, 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.3, except to
the one generating the brodcast, but it will not be
put on the eth0 wire, since that is against an
Have you tried 'smbadduser'?
--- Madhvi Nundalalee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a working samba directory. I have created 2
> new users on my Linux server and want them to access
> some files via samba on the server.
> how do I add these users to the smbpasswd file in my
> samba
--- Kevin Holmquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The short answer is: no
>
> The long answer:
>
> You have two options: routing or bridging.
>
> To route traffic from the internet through your
> linux box to your wife's
> pc would require at least 3 ip address on two
> different subnets. Thi
--- David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> nit etc wrote:
>
> >After putting more thought to this, I realized that
> if
> >my Linux box were to act as a 'real' gateway, since
> >tha
--- David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> nit etc wrote:
>
> >> The real question is, why? What are you trying
> to
> >> accomplish?
> >
> >Because NAT cannot deal with all prot
--- David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Edward C. Bailey wrote:
>
> >>>>>> "nit" == nit etc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >nit> Hi, I have DSL thru Verizon
Hi,
I have DSL thru Verizon, and their DHCP server
provides more than one IP address, so I can have more
than one computer on DSL with real IP addresses.
However, I want my internal machines to be behind my
linux firewall, so anyone know how to configure things
so that my internal network machin
Are you looking for something like this:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/x0rfbserver/
?
--- John Alex Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> In the home folder, you have a .vnc folder. In there
> you have a xstartup
> which starts the window manager. By default it is
> the trvm (i believe),
> y
If your X setup is at fault, try pressing
"Ctrl+Alt+F1" when your screen blanks out, this might
give you access to the console.
--- ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:32:35 +0800
> Tyrone Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> implied:
>
> > Hi to all,
> >
> >
> > I'm only a newbie in
19 matches
Mail list logo
