in an encrypted form (very simple
encryption, but anyways). i'm posting the e-mail minus the attachment.
Cheers!
-macker
---
A few months back, a very alpha version of bliss got posted. That shouldn't
have happened, but, it was pretty much i
bstitute for this.
*laughs* naturally. my personal home computer sits next to my bed, but
then i'm a lazy person with no life, and i'm sure this wouldn't work for
everyone. it is quite comfortable though! ;)
> Ideally, I'd have my servers built into my chair, and I'
o hardware immediately.
Why not rewrite, or update, LILO and call it SLILO (Secure LILO)?
Sounds good to me anyways... anyone else know if this has already been
done?
-macker
BTW, feel free to e-mail me off-list concerning this... I could probably
--ignore-compressed
Do not scan compressed files. By default, Uvscan
will internally unpack certain kinds of compressed
files and scan the decompressed form.
Cheers!
-macker
--
PLEASE read t
#x27;t
have much hope .. the friend's parallel port zip drive (not zip plus)
worked fine on multiple occasions up to that fatal night.
New motherboard/CPU/etc. should be arriving tomorrow, so i'm not so
worried about it, as the current system will be moved to other tasks, and
not be using
ce yourself... it's very
simple to do and works fine. I have had no problems here, and after
stripping the bin it was actually about 3k lighter than the original.
Cheers!
-macker
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Ross Camm wrote:
> Got it !
> It seems Apache 1.2.5 doen't want to know about direcories if they are
> executable, even if no ececutables reside in the directory. Make the
> directores +x and all works fine ..!
>
> Rossco
If i'm reading that right you're saying your dirs we
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Ross Camm wrote:
> We run Redhat 5.0. Just upgraded to apache 1.2.5. with the rpm
>
> Now it seems nobody can access any sub directorys of our main document
> directory. Access is ok to the documents directorybut not its sub
> directorys ( where eveything is )
> Apache r
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Phil Blancett wrote:
> Hello all,
>Is there anyway to make a user log into
> a specific directrory with the ./adduser command.
> I don't want to have to create a group for each user but
> all my new clients going into the web server have a hard
> time tunneling up to /home
like to try that, but I am at a loss...
I'm running slack at present locally and it's been a while since I
installed afterstep, but this should give you a good lead...
macker:/var/X11R6/lib# cat xinitrc
#!/bin/sh
# AfterStep v1.0 Default xinitrc
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
exec afters
On Sun, 3 May 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 1998, macker wrote:
>
> > i'm having a problem with /usr/bin/who .. it keeps failing. i've seen
> ...
> > who: Memory exhausted
>
> who does this when your wtmp/utmp files get too large. The be
hi all..
i'm having a problem with /usr/bin/who .. it keeps failing. i've seen
past errors causing coredumps and other errors if i remember right...
here's the current error:
who: Memory exhausted
we have 128 megs of RAM in a P333 and lilo has a mem=128M line, and free
reports 34 megs being u
12 matches
Mail list logo
