ars ago there was
FUD about RH being M$ of linux world, we all shrugged it off, well, look
at things now
--
Res
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
s face it thats all those
tossers at verisign/net-sol are). It wont take long for the likes of
freshrpms and the rest of us to build binary rpm's that do include it.
To hell with verisign! Lets hope this law suite I heard thats been
launched completely utterly destroys the pricks.
--
Regards,
R
al to kill them. It should be
> considered self defense :)
Hmm .yes yes, I much rather your suggestion :)
--
Regards,
Res
Network Administrator
Postmaster / Abusemster / Flamemaster
http://www.ausics.net Australian Hosting Services
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL P
ure these scumbags take to force there spam upon us, a new
counter measure will appear :)
--
Regards,
Res
Network Administrator
Postmaster / Abusemster / Flamemaster
http://www.ausics.net Australian Hosting Services
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
sign and thwat (who are
owned by verisign) certificates, which I now deem to be hostile content.
This is not the first time verisgn aka network non-solutions have fscked
with my business, so I sure as hell are going to return the favour now :)
--
Regards,
Res
Network Administrator
Postmaste
571 ACCESS DENIED to
"$&{client_name}" by Wirehub! Internet DNSBL
(http://blackholes.easynet.nl/errors.html)"', `')dnl
We use another one but it rarely triggers, probably because Easynet
has already caught it.
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`list.dsbl.org')dnl
Cya
--
he whole Linux
> > > System ) without Anti-Viruses ?
> >
> > Please don't take offense but I don't understand what your question is.
> > Can you rephrase it?
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe
thing
> cuz when I went to 8.x last time I had so many problems I gave up.
7.3 will cease to be supported as of the end of this year so give some
thought to it, if you only have a server, sure upgrade to 9 its painless
from 7.3 or was for us with our mail/web/dns/news/ftp servers
just make sure
What is the most efficient means of logging matches? I suppose that I
My god! Why do you want to do this?
Seriously you are asking for trouble your logs will grow so big so fast it
will defeat the purpose, don't log em, just nuke em.
>
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits
t wanring, we found this out the hard way)
so in some cases its dangerous to use, its logging is pathetic, our trial
period is about to expire ina few days and we are looking at alterntives.
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, David Hart wrote:
> Joe threw in the towel. Actually, I am reliably informed that this is
> the result of losing PacBell's financial support.
Would you continue assisting a person who acts the way joe has?
I sure as hell wouldn't either :)
--
Res
-
N
mails.
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their incompetance, which is the ONLY thing they excel at.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
gt; >
> > Yes, I recognize the irony in trying to get the word out via email ;).
> >
> > --
> > Jim Seymour | "Some of the lies are so strange it
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | makes you wonder about the spammer's
> >
nf and runing lilo first arent you?
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their incompetance, which is the ONLY thing they excel at.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
etter off with proftpd
vsftpd is only good for basic use, they are about as secure and fast as
each other, which is better than wu-ftpd :)
bandwith limit by file/host whatever, its very powerfull, and when you
have multiple ftp virtuals, you only need 1 file unlike vsftpd which is a
horrid mes
onard Miller wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a friend that is trying to change some settings on
> vsftpd. He wanted to change the listen port and download
> speed, so I told him to change listen_port and anon_max_rate
> in /etc/vsftpd.conf. That apparently didn't work. I didn't se
probably going to be about as difficult as sendmail in setting it
up, but it wont clutter up your local passwd file so it's a better option.
>
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their incompetance, which is the ONLY thing th
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Chris W. Parker wrote:
> But MS said they are going to start paying attention to security. I don't think
> there's anything to worry about.
>
> Just kidding.
muwhahahahahahaha
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos b
licable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby
> notified that you may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message
> or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in
> error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and
and was thoroughly frustrated with how
> useless it was.
It amazes me how many people run software they have idea on what it does.
I ahree, if if its going to mass email every user on this list who posts,
they should be put on vacation mode untill they get their act together.
or he will so
Can people who wish to use shit like this on this or ANY list please set
it up correctly.
I will not bother to reply to anyone who use this crap on mailing lists
when the post was not directed specifically to you.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:49:41 -0500
From
Freeradius is your best choice.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Willem van der Walt<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If any one is using a radius server on RH8 or later, please let me know?
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their incom
gt; After reading about all the problems people had with 8 I would stay away
> from it. They changed a LOT of things with 8 (like new versions of Apache
> etc) which caused a lot of things to break.
RH9 runs apache, vhost, pri and sec mx's, pri dns and nntp all without a
glitchfor de
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Ben Russo wrote:
> WAIT A MINUTE, I have blonde hair, too (some of it anyway) and I have
> always maintained
> that the blonde syndrome only affects females!!!:-P
Me always maintained that too! :)
>
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits w
e list however I cannot login...any
> suggestions? Here is my smb.conf file.
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their incompetance, which is only thing they excel at.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PR
lists for such waste of space comments.
Well done Redhat71, though it's been said before (by me and others, now
you) and will no doubtedly have to be said again, within a very short
period of time :)
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 0/0 -d 203.220.x.x -p tcp --destination-port \
25 -j ACCEPT
(just repeat the above line for each port you want to allow repalceing
port no.)
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos
Hi Nate,
On Tue, 27 May 2003, nate wrote:
> redhat 7.x uses linux 2.4.x doesn't it ? if so you'll probably want
7.1 onwards use 2.4.x, 7.0 used the 2.2.x kernel
>
--
Res
-
Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they
damage through their incomp
s?? Curious to know how it went if so..
--
-Res
Micro$oft-: Destruction of theory "You get what you pay for"
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
0-1Kb/s download speed
> > from BitTorrent included) can get their hands on it.
--
-Res
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
30 matches
Mail list logo
