It also wouldn't hurt to have a halfway decent video card...you didn't
specify what yours is.
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: newbie: redhat 9.0 very slow
> On
Sounds like you're talking about bonding, not load
balancing...google is your friend. When you know what you're looking for is the
time to ask it here.
Regards,
MRW
- Original Message -
From:
mike
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 12:52
PM
Sub
Legal characters for BIND are a-z, 0-9 and "-". Nothing else.
MRW
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Staudenmayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: RE: Legal Characters in DNS
> I believe they used to be legal but now you shoul
I don't know about your second question but regarding the first:
It sounds like this is the same setup (exactly) that you were using under
Win and getting 4-5K?
If so, are you plugging into the same phone jack as before? Are you using a
longer RJ-11 cable? Have you tried setting your port speed a
Pretty much a necessity in such a case. Maybe not if you used a mobo with
same chip set?
MRW
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux CDs and Stuff
- Original Message -
From: "Sachintha Karunaratne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "redhat list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 2:30 PM
Subje
A google search on Linux vpn brings 755,000 hits including HOWTOs.
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux CDs and Stuff
- Original Message -
From: "Sudh Peram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 3:53 AM
Subject: VPN solution
> Hi,
I don't think so. You'd be better off asking the list if anyone has an old
CD around that they might send to you.
Peace,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux CDs and Stuff
- Original Message -
From: "Raghuraj, Ajay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July
]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: Why is RH9 slower than Windows98SE. Any advice?
> MWafkowski wrote:
> > I'll try to distill my point. At this time there is no full blown GUI
> > (functonality, eye candy, ease of use, etc.) that is not a pig on Linux.
>
--
From: "Emmanuel Seyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: Why is RH9 slower than Windows98SE. Any advice?
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 03:44:58PM -0400, MWafkowski wrote:
> >
> > I can use them fine...you giv
Is that the one next to my "any" key?
MRW
> ways to see an immediate improvement on RH9.
>
> Also, please locate the [snip] key on your keyboard.
>
> --
> Cliff Wells, Software Engineer
> Logiplex Corporation (www.logiplex.net)
> (503) 978-6726 (800) 735-0555
>
>
> --
> redhat-list mailin
Ryan - You make good points and gave information I was not aware of. Let me
just make it clear that I WANT TO BE WRONG about desktop Linux. If I am then
that's great. I didn't rant to try to show someone that I was "smart." (well
maybe a smartass). 8^)
I'm just trying to address (what I see) as th
Emmanual -
I can use them fine...you give me the resources to get a network full of
former Windows/Mac users to use them efficiently and I'll eat my words.
Until then, for people thinking about switching the "masses" to desktop
Linux (which is what my rant/point is about)
Your atitude/point of vi
I'll try to distill my point. At this time there is no full blown GUI
(functonality, eye candy, ease of use, etc.) that is not a pig on Linux.
I'm quite willing to concede that the problem might be KDE or Gnome, but
since they must reside on X it's hard for me to believe that no one has
developed
The Reason - X, X and X again.
I hate X.
Mike Wafkowski
- Original Message -
From: "Apollo (Carmel Entertainment)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:52 AM
Subject: Why is RH9 slower than Windows98SE. Any advice?
> I am migrating my workstations t
Simplest and most useful answer...add another 128 megs of ram. Barring that,
make sure that you don't have an services running that you don't need, lower
video to 16 bit if you have it higher; use hdparm to potentially speed HD
access, if that all fails and ram is not an option, use another WM like
You've had the nerve (or the innocence 8^) to expose the "elephant" in the
middle of the living room.
Among all the high fives and rah-rahing on this list (and other Linux lists
I belong to) about Linux vs Windows there are some things most of us would
seem to rather ignore.
Linux people have th
Take a look at Peanut or Vector Linux, though you can run RH with enough ram
on that machine (min 128 meg for X) and a halfway decent video card with
four megs of ram or more.
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux CDs and Things
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Sutcliffe
Entirely different distro, Knoppix is.
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux and Things
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Unable to install Red Hat 9
> I used CD-R. I didn't try w
Not by default, with good reason. Use SSH and be smart, close down the
telnet daemon!
Regards,
Mike Wafkowski
http://www.osheaven.net
Linux Software and Things
- Original Message -
From: "Brent L. Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:59 PM
Subje
19 matches
Mail list logo
