d be
none the wiser...or so I'm hoping. I don't think they would go so far as to
sniff packets to see if there's SMTP traffic being sent to me.
-Halcyon
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Thanks for the help, everyone. I really appreciate it.
-Halcyon
- Original Message -
From: "Burke, Thomas G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: blackhole firewall rules
> There
x to y port, drop
packet. otherwise, allow. Ideally, the rule would do a hostname lookup to
see if it's from home.net, but if that's impossible I can probably just
figure out the IP range that @home uses.
Halcyon
___
Redhat-list mailing lis
ns pretty regularly, so I need to be discreet about my mail
server.
I'm pretty sure that you can create some sort of rule with ipchains to
become invisible to @home and if anyone can help me out or help me help
myself, I'd greatly appreci
Has anyone had experience with these packages yet? I *really* want the
nicer looking fonts in Netscape, but I'm afraid to try these rpms. :/
-Halcyon
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> For those who complained, XFree86 4.0 packages are now available.
>
&g
I was hit by this exploit last week, and after searching deja.com I read
that even the update for bind on the errata page is vulnerable. You must
update to P5 on rawhide.redhat.com to be safe.
-Halcyon
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, M. Erickson wrote:
> where can I get more info on this rootkit and
