On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 06:56:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:13:04 -0700, David Demner wrote:
>>
>> > I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the
most
> Help,
>I am trying to set up samba. I need to incorporate a
> raft of users with mixed case in their username. Linux will
> not allow be to do this. Is this an absolute - do I need to
> have all Winx users change their usernames or am I just hosed?
>
>I have tried to enter the user
I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the
most recent version of OpenSSL available on their website was
version 0.9.7c (which purportedly contains important bugfixes)
but the most recent version available on RHN was version 0.9.7a.
Same thing with BIND (version 9.2.2 on the
I have a question about up2date. I recently noticed that the most recent version of
OpenSSL available on their website was version 0.9.7c (which purportedly contains
important bugfixes) but the most recent version available on RHN was version 0.9.7a.
Same thing with BIND (version 9.2.2 on thei
>> Have you looked at Samba? I believe it can act as a BDC.
> Hello all,
>
> Is it possible to used red hat as a BDC?
>
> I would love to be able to drop in an Extra Linux server and do this
> if it is possible ...
>
> TIA
> Keith Birchfield
>
A quick www.google.com search for 'linux backup d
> Anyone running a helpdesk on Redhat?
>
> So I'm interested in an alternative, preferably something on Linux using
> MySQL,
We use scarab (http://scarab.tigris.org). It uses MySql, Tomcat (ie: is web-based)
allows custom reporting, seems to be well-supported, etc... It's very good,
but we d
>
> Actually, I just installed openssl-devel.
>
> Someone told me that I need to build an RPM out of the tarball, but it
> requires a lot of packages that I really dont want or need.
>
> Anyone have any further suggestions?
>
> Thanks..
> Jason
I had this problem as well. I fixed it by creat
> On Thursday, 24 July, 2003 22:45, David Demner wrote:
> > A number of people (including me) had this problem.
> >
> > --- Original reponse thanks to Michael Fratoni ---
> > Did you perhaps 'upgrade' to glibc*.i386.rpm on an i686 system?
> > If so, hav
A number of people (including me) had this problem.
--- Original reponse thanks to Michael Fratoni ---
Did you perhaps 'upgrade' to glibc*.i386.rpm on an i686 system?
If so, have a look here for possible fixes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88456
--- Thanks again to Michael
> --__--__--
>
>
> Hello,
> I am wondering if anyone can help me with this scenario.
>
> So, any ideas on how to do this?
>
Here's one:
1. Buy a hard drive & hook it up
2. Copy the data to the hard drive
3. Snail mail the hard drive to the recipient
Does it really have to be copied over the
I don't think that's true. The rules are processed in order,
so in the DNS case, the line with:
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
would have been used (since it was higher up on the table),
iptables would have stopped checking other rules, and
the last line wouldn't h
You need to allow both TCP and UDP for DNS to work:
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
David
--__--__--
Message: 13
From: "Scott Antonivich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: iptables causing p
>
> My guess is that your port is either not open on 25 or that it's
> restricted by iptables or hosts.deny.
>
I don't know anything about postfix, but I don't think this is correct. If port 25
was blocked, the logs wouldn't get into the maillog (which is generated by postfix).
It sounds t
Ed,
I have a similar setup to yours (f-prot and mailscanner), but I don't use the
f-prot-autoupdate program. I use a script at /usr/local/f-prot/check-updates.sh to
check for new virus definitions.
The checksum program comes with f-prot, so it's probably in a directory the update
script can't
Would DNS no longer work?
Just curious,
David
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Matthew Saltzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question on caching-nameserver
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, David Demner
I don't think you need to have the ip address in the rules. Here's what I have in a
very similar setup as yours and it does the trick:
*nat
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
I'm pretty sure you can just replace the MASQUERADE with SNAT, but no guarantees.
*filter
-A INPUT -m state
I can't help you, but http://www.Google.com probably can. Searching for "php and
apache" yields the following result first:
http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/1374/1/
It looks pretty good.
Good luck,
David
--__--__--
Message: 5
From: sharif<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: php conf
RH used to use dhcpcd to get an IP address through DHCP, and there was a flag for
dhcpcd so it didn't replace the resolv.conf, but this doesn't appear to be the case
any more. They now use dhclient which doesn't have this flag.
Poking around, it looks like the script /sbin/dhclient-script is re
Hi Laurie,
The only thing that I could find that might help is:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-089.html
which refers to the bug in glibc at:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82619
On another page, there was a reference to a bug in shadow-utils and groups, but that
Hi Ben,
The most important thing is to not hook your box up to the internet (except through a
well-configured firewall) until you are confident with the security! Use a disk or CD
to transfer RPMs to the box.
I find the default configuration for RH9 is pretty good, but definitely needs some
t
I like the script at:
http://www.bluehaze.com.au/unix/cdbkup.html
It's configured to split the archives into CD sized files, but this is easy to change.
It supports incremental backups, gzip/bz2 compression, etc...
David
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: "Richard Humphrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
21 matches
Mail list logo
