Re: Unreal Tournament 2003

2002-10-08 Thread Adam Mercer
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 19:47:00 -0300 "Geoffrey Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got a copy of unreal tournament 2003 and the third CD seems to have > a linux installation executable but my PC that has linux on it isn't > fast enough to support it. I was wondering if anybody else had bought > the

Mail relay check

2002-02-25 Thread Adam Mercer
Hi Well I enable my firewall, using gnome-lokkit, to accept incoming mail I get a dialog box telling me that Mail services are enabled and do I want to check for relaying. I click OK and imediatly and error message pops up saying "Unexpected end of file" Also my machines doesn't seem to be accep

Re: Return Path:

2002-02-24 Thread Adam Mercer
> | When I send mail from my system the Return-Path: header in the email > | is set to > | Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | this is obviously causing a few problems, how can I make sure that > | this is set to the right address? > > The domain is set in /etc/sendmail.cf, thus: > > Djc

Re: Return Path:

2002-02-24 Thread Adam Mercer
> >When I send mail from my system the Return-Path: header in the email > >is set to > > > >Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >this is obviously causing a few problems, how can I make sure that > >this is set to the right address? > > Take a look at your /etc/hosts file. It is probably set

Return Path:

2002-02-24 Thread Adam Mercer
Hi When I send mail from my system the Return-Path: header in the email is set to Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> this is obviously causing a few problems, how can I make sure that this is set to the right address? Cheers Adam -- # Okay, what on Earth is this one supposed to be used for?

Re: Any ETA on Redhat 8?

2002-02-22 Thread Adam Mercer
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Timothy Lee Young wrote: > I'd think that it would be more appropriate to call the next release 7.3, > instead of 8.0, because there is no major change in the kernel or other > components. As rawhide is using a glibc-2.3-pre developement version and a snapshot of gcc 3.1 I'd