Where do I find the tools to use
c2faxsend on my RedHat7.2?
The following modules are loaded:
capi 19136 0
kernelcapi 30240 1 [capi]
capiutil 23008 0 [kernelcapi]
capifs 3904 1 [capi]
/sbin/capiinit start failed:
ERROR: f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:15, David Talkington wrote:
>> Edward Marczak wrote:
>>
>> >Which makes me ask: Have I just missed a way to have samba authenticate
>> >through Pam instead of using its own database?
>>
>> Yes, but yo
Looks fine to me. Keep asking, I suppose. I am running 1.0.6, I might
add. Try upgrading (if you need help I'd be more than willing to help
with that, although I admit I succumbed to letting Ximian help me with
that part...) and see if that fixes the problem. What version of RH are
you running?
I'm going to stop cross-posting this :)
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 20:11, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> I thought it would solve the problem to include the HWADDR parameter in
> ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth1, but that's only a partial solution.
Well, I'll be dipped; that's the first reference to HWADDR I
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:15, David Talkington wrote:
> Edward Marczak wrote:
>
> >Which makes me ask: Have I just missed a way to have samba authenticate
> >through Pam instead of using its own database?
>
> Yes, but you may have to roll your own. See --with-pam and
> - --with-pam_smbpass optio
... The copy of the message I sent which I received was incomplete. I'm
resending it.
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 07:26, Ed Wilts wrote:
> OE mangled your message - it came through entirely as an attachment so
it's
> a little more awkward for me to reply, so I'm leaving your message
intact at
> the bo
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 21:00, Edward Marczak wrote:
>
> ...and a third: sites with mixed clients. Ever try to serve people who hop
> around between Macs *and* PCs? While possible, it's not pretty. However,
> with NetWare or 2000, both clients share the same password to authenticate
> and groups
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jochen Kaechelin wrote:
>Is it normal on RedHat that each user has it's own group?
It's normal for Red Hat. There are pros and cons to this scheme. But
this:
>On SuSE it would look like the following:
>
>> -rw-rw1 birgit users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edward Marczak wrote:
>Which makes me ask: Have I just missed a way to have samba authenticate
>through Pam instead of using its own database?
Yes, but you may have to roll your own. See --with-pam and
- --with-pam_smbpass options to configure. Th
Is it normal on RedHat that each user has it's own group?
> -rw-rw1 birgit birgit 0 Mär 22 23:38 birgit
> -rw-rw1 jochen jochen1272536 Mär 22 23:52 jochen
> -rw-rw1 mathias mathias 5907 Mär 22 23:43 mathias
> -rw---1 root root
My fstab for this partition is:
/dev/hda1 /mnt/vfat vfat
user,owner,exec,dev,suid,rw,conv=auto,uid=500,gid=500,auto 0 0
On 03/23/02, 03:40:50PM -0800, Brandon Dorman wrote:
> I've had it give me sidebar problems before, I think I changed my fstab
> settings. What does your fstab
On 3/21/02 12:15 PM, "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:37:25AM -0500, David Kramer wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Scott Sharkey wrote:
>>
>> Today, there is only one valid reason for not using a Linux box with Samba
>> to replace NT shares or Netware.
>
> [compa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leonard Miller wrote:
>Create a perl script called pingsweep.pl
Or make it easy on yourself:
$ nmap -sP 125.125.125.0/24
Try it ...
- -d
- --
David Talkington
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--
On 23 Mar 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 07:33, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious if your experience matches mine:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60205
>
> No, but your problem is what I described in an email I sent to the
> redhat-
Create a perl script called pingsweep.pl
for( $i=1; $i<255; $i++ ) {
print "125.125.125.$i: ";
print `ping -c 1 125.125.125.$i`;
print "\n";
Then at the command prompt, have it write to a file like this
perl pingsweep.pl > pingsweep.txt
Looks like it will do what you want it to. Bu
Create a perl script called pingsweep.pl
for( $i=1; $i<255; $i++ ) {
print "125.125.125.$i: ";
print `ping -c 1 125.125.125.$i`;
print "\n";
Then at the command prompt, have it write to a file like this
perl pingsweep.pl > pingsweep.txt
Looks like it will do what you want it to. Bu
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Volkan Erdogan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Suppose there are 150 pc in a network and all of these pc use same subnet
> mask.
> i.e: 1 pc125.125.125.2
> 2.pc125.125.125.5
> 3.pc125.125.125.7
> .
> .
> .
> 150.pc>>>125.125.125.208
> Now I wan
Hello,
Suppose there are 150 pc in a network and all of these pc use same subnet
mask.
i.e: 1 pc125.125.125.2
2.pc125.125.125.5
3.pc125.125.125.7
.
.
.
150.pc>>>125.125.125.208
Now I want to know which of these pc are alive.
How can I do that using "ping
Hi
I have just setup a virtual interface eth0:1 and traffic such as dns
lookup and rsync randomly goes out on the virtual interface. How do i
fix this so that only the eth0 interface is used?
M
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https:
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 17:49, Michael Oatman wrote:
> Thanks George,
>
> I tried using webmin but I think I'd rather fully understand and tweak
> config file settings, since I was better off pre-webmin in terms of
> what the XP boxen could access. I haven't been able to get SWAT to
> work since
I've had it give me sidebar problems before, I think I changed my fstab
settings. What does your fstab look like for it?
-Brandon
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 11:36, John P Verel wrote:
> (This is also posted to the Enigma list. My appologies for any
> duplications)
>
> I'm running nautilus-1.0.4-43
This might just be a matter of uninstalling the prior gnome, if it is in the
db of rpm. I have 2 gnome icons showing up on the enigma window, and not one
(the footprint icon). Should I just rpm -e the prior gnome if it exists?
Whatever the case, it has caused no problems yet.
-kirby
(This is also posted to the Enigma list. My appologies for any
duplications)
I'm running nautilus-1.0.4-43. It has just begun to crash when I touch
/mnt/vfat/windows. It has seems to have no problem with other
directories in /mnt/vfat, which is a FAT32 partition.
It sometimes just disappears,
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_ascension.dragonsdawn.net-5900-1016909983-0001-2"
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 07:33, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>
> I'm curious if your experience matches mine:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60205
No, but your problem is what I described in an email I sent to the
redhat-list last night titled "initscripts improvement".
On Sat, 2002-03-23 at 03:27, Alex Iruc wrote:
>
> I have the followin situation: I give net access to an user (with
> a real IP address), but he is giving net to another one by using IP
> MASQURADING. I want to filter out, to block any data packet that comes
> from that masqueraded ip. I kn
Thanks George,
I tried using webmin but I think I'd rather fully understand and tweak
config file settings, since I was better off pre-webmin in terms of
what the XP boxen could access. I haven't been able to get SWAT to
work since I installed webmin either. It is greyed out in the KDE
service
What does this mean:
jochen fam[1625]: fd 6 write error: Broken pipe
--
Jochen
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 02:58:57PM +0100, Kjetil Tjensvold wrote:
> When I type locate 2.4.7-10 it still lists all the old
> paths with directorys related to my old kernel,
> although I erased them for a long time ago.
This is normal. Locate doesn't check the current filesystem for the
existance
Hello fellow Redhat developer,
I'm new to this mailing list but I think this is the
right place to ask my questions. I'm an application
developer from NT platform trying to migrate to
Redhat. I'm trying to port my web application that I
wrote and tested under NT/JRun. I'm looking for the
best
OE mangled your message - it came through entirely as an attachment so it's
a little more awkward for me to reply, so I'm leaving your message intact at
the bottom. Might just be OE, but it's only a couple of people on the list
that this does it to me with... Looking at the e-mail on my imap ser
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:58:57 +0100 (CET)
Kjetil Tjensvold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated:
> Hi.
> Some strange things happen to my lin box after
> upgrading the kernel from 2.4.7-10 to 2.4.9-31.
> When I type locate 2.4.7-10 it still lists all the old
> paths with directorys related to my
I justed switched from SuSE 7.3 to RedHat 7.2.
On my SuSE I used the following script to secure my Server:
#!/bin/bash
IPT="/sbin/iptables"
LAN="eth0"
WEB="ppp0"
#Load the module.
modprobe ip_tables
#Flush old rules, delete the firewall chain if it exists
$IPT -F
$IPT -F -t nat
$IPT -X firewall
Hello!
I have sendmail-8.9.3-10 with appropriate sendmail-cf-8.9.3-10 and
sendmail-doc-8.9.3-10 on my RedHat 6.0 configured and working well.
Looking on errata there is no new sendmail package on the list.
For RedHat 6.2 errata recommends upgrade to
sendmail-8.11.6-1.6.y.i386.rpm
with adequate cf
Hi.
Some strange things happen to my lin box after
upgrading the kernel from 2.4.7-10 to 2.4.9-31.
When I type locate 2.4.7-10 it still lists all the old
paths with directorys related to my old kernel,
although I erased them for a long time ago. This means
a lot of troble for my sound card since i
I have a really hard question for you guys:)
I have the followin situation: I give net access to an user (with
a real IP address), but he is giving net to another one by using IP
MASQURADING. I want to filter out, to block any data packet that comes
from that masqueraded ip. I know t
Hello Eveyone,
I had the following hard drives in my RH7.2 Server :
10 gig IDE
20 gig IDE
9 gig SCSI
9 gig SCSI
9 gig SCSI
I was quite pushed for time and was meant to end up with the following :
20 gig IDE
9 gig SCSI
9 gig SCSI
but instead, I pulled out the wrong IDE. Currently this IDE runs
37 matches
Mail list logo
