RE: RPM won't install/upgrade things for me...

2000-05-17 Thread Manuel Antonio Camacho Quesada
I am not an RPM expert, but I would try to rebuild the RPM database first (look at the man page for this. It is pretty easy). Then I would try to "upgrade" the packages with rpm -Uvh instead of rpm -ivh. -Manuel. > -Mensaje original- > De: Stan Bubrouski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envi

RE: [OT] RAD cgi-form development

2000-05-17 Thread Tanner, Robby
For getting things lined up, you could consider Microsoft FrontPage. Once you get things formatted, open your HTML in Linux and add the other stuff from there. > -Original Message- > From: Alan Mead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 4:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How much is enough?

2000-05-17 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jerry Human wrote: > Hello Good People: > > I'm getting ready to build a new computer that will primarily run RH > Linux. Before I do I'd like to ask a few questions to help me make the > best build. > > A) First I'd like to know of some of the more_Linux_friendly > moth

Slashdot?

2000-05-17 Thread Eric Cifreo
Hey guys,   Yesterday I saw an article claiming that Microsoft was demanding that Slashdot remove some posts regarding Microsoft's (typical) proprietary extensions to the Kerberos protocol.   I haven't been able to get to /. for the last 24 hours. Anyone else getting through?  Did someone shu

ANNOUNCE: KDE Snapshot Binaries available 2000-05-12

2000-05-17 Thread Christopher Molnar
VERY IMPORTANT: THESE BINARIES ARE CREATED FROM THE CVS AND MAY NOT BE IDENTICAL TO THE BETA THAT WAS RELEASED. THESE ARE NOT OFFICIAL KDE BINARIES. ALSO, THE PACKAGES HAVE MOVED TO A NEW SERVER THANKS TO MANDRAKE. PLEASE CHECK THE LINKS BELOW. A new version of the KDE ALPHA binaries are avail

Re: scriptable screen shots?

2000-05-17 Thread Bret Hughes
Actually, I was hoping to be able to present it via web server. go to a specific URL on the machine and script a screen capture and conversion to something most web browsers can see. I did get it to work (sort of) but lost momentum. The colors were way funky, like the color map was all wrong.

Is the list Up?

2000-05-17 Thread Eddie Strohmier
Could someone on the list e-mail me if the list is up or having problems again. I am receiving sporadic mails from time to time and I see nothing I send in posted. Thanks, Eddie Strohmier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Additional Info Re KDE Question

2000-05-17 Thread P Eads
The error message I get when composing new email is "QPainter cannot destroy what is being painted". I don't have a clue what it means but it happens whether I'm using a mouse to go from field to field or the Tab key. Kmail will download email, it just will not let me compose any email. I hope t

IDE-SCSI

2000-05-17 Thread Steve Borho
Is there some trick to making the default kernel that ships with 6.2 use the ide-scsi emulator for cdroms without recompiling? It seems to be it should be possible if one knew the right incantations to put into /etc/conf.modules and /etc/lilo.conf. Has anyone tried this? -- Steve Borho

Re: RH on a 386?

2000-05-17 Thread Bill Carlson
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jim Baxter wrote: > Hi Gang > > I have been asked if RH 6.2 ( or 5.2 even) will run on a 386 with 32 mb > memory and 40mb hard disk. > Can't say why he wants to but I suspect it is some old junk he is wanting to > get some use out of. It will run Linux, but not Redhat becaus

imwheel problems

2000-05-17 Thread eric clover
hello, I got my m$ (un)intellimouse working (with all the help from the list) , in all my programs , except Netscape. the way I got it running was to copy the imwheelrc to my /home dir as .imwheelrc and all of a sudden , the wheel started working , but like I said , not in Netscape. here it what I

More on RPMs

2000-05-17 Thread Kevin Hancock
Hi All I have a redhat 6.0 computer (a different one than last time) and I am trying to upgrade all the patches redhat recommend I apply on their update page. This is a slow process download package try to install get list of failed dependencies do until satisfied download required

Re: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms

2000-05-17 Thread Kevin Hancock
- Original Message - From: Glen Lee Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 1:06 AM Subject: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms > I recently re-installed 6.1, and now the system isn't keeping accurate > track of installed rp

RE: command to keep job running after logout?

2000-05-17 Thread Jon Nichols
I didnt see anyone else answer, so I'll give it a go. nohup (your command here) HTH jon -Original Message- From: Barton Hodges [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2000 9:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:command to keep job running after logout? I seem to

RE: [OT] Linux keyboards

2000-05-17 Thread Doug McGarrett
Steve Reilly sent the following, quoting my original recommendation: >>> And after all, you don't _need_ Windows keys! > >>Go working at a Sun Sparc or Ultra for a while and you might reconsider >>that statement... ;-) Another set of modifiers can be dead handy at >>times... > >it's handy

Re: command to keep job running after logout?

2000-05-17 Thread Steve Feehan
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Barton Hodges wrote: > I seem to have forgotten what the command > was to keep a job running even after I log > out of the console... can anyone help? > > Thanks. > See the info page for nohup or at. I generally use at. -- Steve Feehan Phone: 785-53

Re: command to keep job running after logout?

2000-05-17 Thread Anthony E. Greene
Barton Hodges wrote: > > I seem to have forgotten what the command > was to keep a job running even after I log > out of the console... can anyone help? man nohup -- Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Homepage & PGP Key Linux: The choice of a GNU Generati

Re: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms

2000-05-17 Thread Matt Housh
> I recently re-installed 6.1, and now the system isn't keeping accurate > track of installed rpms. Yesterday I installed mod_ssl. I just tried to > uninstall it and received the following message: > > $ rpm -e mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.12-1.i586.rpm > error: package mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.12-1.i586.rpm is

Re: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms

2000-05-17 Thread Glen Lee Edwards
>You may want to re-read the man pages for rpm. I believe the correct >syntax to uninstall the file is, "rpm -e mod_ssl". So easy, yet so hard. Thanks! It worked. Glen -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Re: internal webserver / starting daemon

2000-05-17 Thread Gordon Messmer
Alan Mead wrote: > Wow, I just sat down to ask this question! I want to run some services > that are accessible locally but which do not appear to be running from the > outside. I have a Linux 6.1 machine Masq'ing a small LAN on the @Home > network. "Servers" are forbidden on this network and t

Re: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms

2000-05-17 Thread Wayne Dyer
Glen Lee Edwards wrote: > I recently re-installed 6.1, and now the system isn't keeping accurate > track of installed rpms. Yesterday I installed mod_ssl. I just tried to > uninstall it and received the following message: > > $ rpm -e mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.12-1.i586.rpm > error: package mod_ssl-2.6

Re: command to keep job running after logout?

2000-05-17 Thread Edward Marczak
on 9/5/00 12:28 PM, Barton Hodges shot down the bitstream: > I seem to have forgotten what the command > was to keep a job running even after I log > out of the console... can anyone help? If you put it in the background, it'll keep going. You could also use 'nohup'. I also like to use 'screen

RE: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms

2000-05-17 Thread Uncle Meat
On 09-May-00 Glen Lee Edwards opined: > I recently re-installed 6.1, and now the system isn't keeping accurate > track of installed rpms. Yesterday I installed mod_ssl. I just tried to > uninstall it and received the following message: > > $ rpm -e mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.12-1.i586.rpm > error: pack

Re: rpm file not keeping accurate records of installed rpms

2000-05-17 Thread Michael J. Eisenhower
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:36:47AM -0500, Glen Lee Edwards wrote: > I recently re-installed 6.1, and now the system isn't keeping accurate > track of installed rpms. Yesterday I installed mod_ssl. I just tried to > uninstall it and received the following message: > > $ rpm -e mod_ssl-2.6.0_1.3.