angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6118)
That's why the code should be modified to be a normal string without that
pluralisable option.
These are some examples of what the bit community of translators faces:
Problematic string:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6118)
Source strings should be in the format singular | plural:
```
{{PLURAL|one=%{count} minute ago|%{count} minutes ago}}
```
But the problematic string does not have a singular part.
BTW, as a website maintainer, you should know abou
angoca created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6118)
### Problem
There is an issue while trying to update this string: {{PLURAL|Other}}
Full description here:
https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Translating_talk:OpenStreetMap#About_Osm%3ASocial_links.show%2Fes
--
Reply to this email
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6035)
Thank you for your answer. By reading again the wiki page, I see that this only
applies to a tiny population of OSM users: "This only affects a tiny minority
of people who joined OSM before 2007 and have not edited OSM since 2009"
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6035)
Ok, thank you for your prompt answer. One last question: Does this mean the
website no longer has usable features? They should be removed to ease the
translations. What is the purpose of having all these strings (in
translatewiki)
angoca created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6035)
### Problem
I am translating and reviewing the website into Spanish.
I found this: "Osm:Site.not public flash.not public/" - "You have not set your
edits to be public." However, I am unsure if the translation is correct.
Is the
angoca created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5991)
### Problem
I want to know if the Welcome section https://welcome.openstreetmap.org/ is
translated into other languages?
And if so, then how to change the language for this welcome section:
I cannot find the translation under
Closed #5990 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5990#event-17560922131
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
rai
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5990)
Great!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5990#issuecomment-2859594027
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
angoca created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5990)
### Problem
In this page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
The attribution example is this:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b7131184-23da-4d2d-8e86-145afd536d02";
/>
However, in the OSMF it says that only the
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5966)
I wrote him in LinkedIn, and he answered me this:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da3d5f7f-88b0-4b36-8089-c3b5e3175dbf";
/>
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstr
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5966)
GPL is not the best-suited license for images or other kinds of artwork. It was
designed for software. A similar situation is that CC-BY is inappropriate for
data, like when OSM switched to ODbL.
In many open-source projects, code
angoca created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5966)
### Problem
I would like to know the license of the images in the website, specifically the
planet during the registration.
I asked the same in communities:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-is-the-license-for-the-imag
angoca left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5941)
A bigger image as it used to be.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-websit
angoca created an issue (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5941)
### Problem
I want to know if the Arm deletion was on purpose or a mistake?
It used to be like this:
But now, it is like this (without th
15 matches
Mail list logo
