[R-pkg-devel] 'rlang' win-builder error for package without rlang dependency

an be safely ignored? [1] https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/box_1.0.3_20210912_125241/Debian/00check.log [2] https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues/476 -- Konrad Rudolph // @klmr [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-proj

Re: [R-pkg-devel] 'rlang' win-builder error for package without rlang dependency

have happened, but I'd also suggest retesting now if if > you haven't tried again since. > > Cheers, > Carrie > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021, 7:26 AM Konrad Rudolph > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My recent CRAN package submission failed with a win-buil

[R-pkg-devel] How to format the NEWS.md file for CRAN submissions?

uld be misleading (and hence undesirable) to change the section headings to use the current package name for the old revisions. [1] https://github.com/klmr/box/blob/9f35bd28b26306fe94ade874c2b93a89ae3f3a61/NEWS.md [2] https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#NEWS-File Cheers, Konrad --

Re: [R-pkg-devel] How to format the NEWS.md file for CRAN submissions?

is, so you could use something > other than the current package name there. > > Duncan Murdoch > > > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/klmr/box/blob/9f35bd28b26306fe94ade874c2b93a89ae3f3a61/NEWS.md > > [2] https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#NEWS-File > > > > Cheers, > > Konrad > > > > -- Konrad Rudolph // @klmr [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] May .External2() be used in packages?

-internal.html Cheers, -- Konrad Rudolph // @klmr [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [External] May .External2() be used in packages?

nts, and computing the same information without these arguments in C code is far from trivial. -- Konrad Rudolph // @klmr [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinf

Re: [R-pkg-devel] [External] May .External2() be used in packages?

21:32, wrote: > yOn Wed, 1 May 2024, Konrad Rudolph wrote: > > > Thanks, > > > > That’s a shame but good to know. > > > > Packages that for whatever reason have chosen to use it > > could instead use .External(), and that is what yo should use

[R-pkg-devel] R CMD check failure during vignette rebuilding

han just the file. Can I prevent this? [1] https://github.com/klmr/vignettetest -- Konrad Rudolph // @klmr __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check failure during vignette rebuilding

? If so, could it be documented more explicitly?“ On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 1:53 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 14/04/2020 6:23 a.m., Konrad Rudolph wrote: > > I have a package vignette that reproducibly fails the second time > > round in `R CMD check`, in the “checking re-bu

[R-pkg-devel] How to avoid R CMD check warning for documentation of non-package functions?

d it’s more verbose. Defining callbacks via special names has ample precedence, both in R and in other languages. And I don’t think `R CMD check` warnings should dictate API design in this manner. [2] https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/userhooks.html -- Konr

Re: [R-pkg-devel] How to avoid R CMD check warning for documentation of non-package functions?

s, you won't use \usage{} or \arguments{}, you'll > put together your own sections using \section{Usage}{ ... } and > \section{Arguments}{ ... } and try to get the formatting right. I’ll keep this in mind! It might come handy. -- Konrad Rudolph // @klmr _