> Wild guess: It's not the package but the file system or file permissions so
> that you cannot determine the size.
Do you have any thoughts on where specifically to look? Permissions of
the library or of the current dir?
I also wondered if it might be caused by a recursive link that caused
the s
The API key and "secret" aren't actually secrets so you can include in the
package.
Hadley
On Friday, June 5, 2015, Neal Fultz wrote:
> I am working on updating the RGoogleDocs package to use OAuth2, since the
> old api was recently turned off (at my job we use it as a poor mans
> database).
>
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Jennifer Bryan wrote:
> Thanks for all of the responses!
>
> What Gabor says below is true and is the path of least resistance in my
> particular case. As Dirk suggested, environment variables are the way to go.
>
> If I put this into .travis.yml:
>
> env:
> - N
> and available as an RSS feed. (If you prefer Twitter, feel free to
> mirror the RSS feed there, if that's possible. I don't use Twitter, so
> I won't do it.) It seems to have become known here essentially
> immediately, so I'm not sure how an announcement would help.
>
> For the reasoning: th
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 4 July 2015 at 09:12, Thierry Onkelinx wrote:
> | You have no guarantee that the user has write access to those folders. So
> | you might want to rethink your strategy.
>
> Seconded. And I am not aware of a good cross-platform soluti
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:50 PM, ProfJCNash wrote:
> I have a general question about appropriate design for a fairly
> complicated package, as I am redesigning and rebuilding the optimx
> package. It will get a new name as it appears that the calls will change
> in order to accommodate new functi
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 5:36 PM, Seth Wenchel wrote:
>> Are you exporting the functions from pkgB and pkgC? It's hard to tell from
>> your table below. The easiest way is to add a comment before each of the
>> functions in pkgB and pkgC that you want
On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 30/07/2015 9:14 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> > On 30/07/2015 8:49 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have a package stable and working. Now, I am trying to consolidate
> some functions that share similar inputs. Example below.
>
> The issue occurs when a function and an S4 generic have the same name;
> I imagine this is fairly uncommon? Wouldn't the function be masked by
> the S4 generic and effectively be invisible after the package was
> loaded?
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Hadley Wickha
>> It seems arguable that this is actually a roxygen bug - the function
>> that's actually exported from the package does not have a type
>> argument.
>
> The package fails R CMD check because of a bad .Rd file. If a user had
> written that file, it would be user error, but roxygen2 wrote it, so I
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> I'm not sure if that's correct -- from what I see, in the generated Rd
> documentation:
>
> - The 'usage' is drawn from the S4 generic,
> - The 'arguments' are drawn from the function.
>
> I think R CMD check is correctly warning about that.
A
Also it's a little strange to put an RDS file _inside_ a gz, since
normally the compression is done internally.
And are you sure you should be exposing this data via a function,
rather than using the regular package data mechanism?
Hadley
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
> O
>> | Check DetailsVersion: 1.8.3
>> | Check: tests
>> | Result: ERROR
>> | Running the tests in ‘tests/stdUsage.R’ failed.
>> | Last 13 lines of output:
>> | > plot(ffTest42,col=Col,plot_GOF=TRUE,speed=T)
>> | [1] "compute goodness-of-fit with leave-one-out k-nearest
>> neighbor(
I'd recommend creating a minimal package that illustrates the problem
using an existing S4 generic in a base package (e.g. stats4::AIC).
That makes it easier to figure out what's gone wrong.
It's unlikely to be a roxygen2 problem since the translation from
@importFrom foo bar (etc) to importFrom(f
ata. ~ Roger Brinner
> The combination of some data and an aching desire for an answer does
> not ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body
> of data. ~ John Tukey
>
>
> 2015-09-01 0:32 GMT+02:00 Hadley Wickham :
>> I'd recommend creating a mini
Why don't you just create your own function?
Hadley
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Benjamin Hofner wrote:
> Dear Gavin,
>
> unfortunately, I cannot overwrite plot.data.frame only. If I do this I
> get the following warning from R CMD check:
>
> * checking use of S3 registration ... WARNING
> Re
Hi Alex,
As far as I know, that's the best solution. In roxygen, I've wrapped
it up with a couple of helpers:
set_collate <- function(locale) {
cur <- Sys.getlocale(category = "LC_COLLATE")
Sys.setlocale(category = "LC_COLLATE", locale = locale)
cur
}
with_collate <- function(locale, code)
I've also seen some problems with missing testthat on
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 - I'd say it's a temporary problem on the
CRAN end, and if your package is ok on win builder, you should be ok
to submit.
Hadley
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Derek Ogle wrote:
> I was hoping to submit a new ver
Here's a minimal reprex:
out <- roc_proc_text(rd_roclet(), "
#' Foo
`foo<-` <- function(x, y, value) {
UseMethod('set_labels<-')
}
#' Foo
`foo<-.default` <- function(x, y, value) {
x
}
")[[2]]
cat(format(out))
That generates
\usage{
\method{foo}{default}(x, y) <- value
}
Take a look at this line:
#' #' Pass through OAS engine
Hadley
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> When I build my package. I get the following warnings. I think these are
> related to LaTex and ElCapitan but are flowing through to my R build. All
> the tes
Why not just make your own as.data.frame method? e.g.
as.data.frame.pin <- function(x, ...) {
structure(
list(x),
class = "data.frame",
row.names = .set_row_names(length(x))
)
}
data.frame() calls as.data.frame() on all of its arguments.
Hadley
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Er
You didn't include the NOTE you saw, and this isn't valid roxygen:
#' @imports methods::fields
So it's a bit hard to tell what the problem is.
Hadley
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Glenn Schultz wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need some help understanding namespace and methods.
>
> I received a
I've found that it's a very bad idea to provide length or names
methods for just this reason.
Hadley
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Nathan Wendt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have run into an issue while developing an R package. Specifically, my
> issue relates to what happens when I define an S3 lengt
The problem seems to be your use of methods::setMethod instead of
setMethod (etc). Roxygen2 doesn't seem to be quite smart enough to
realise that these aren't equivalent. You might want to file an issue
on github so I look into this the next time I'm working on roxygen2.
Hadley
On Fri, Mar 18, 20
rm :-)
>
> I would appreciate if you could please answer (very briefly) questions 1 to
> 3, so I can learn how to correctly document S4 generics properly in the
> future.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> 2016-03-18 15:11 GMT+01:00 Hadley Wickham :
>>
>> The problem seems to be
Does this help?
code <- c("BeginningBal", "Convexity", "EffConvexity", "EffDuration",
"EndingBal",
"Formula", "Horizon", "HorizonReturn", "KeyRateConvexity", "KeyRateDuration",
"KeyRateTenor", "ModDuration", "Name", "PassThroughInterest", "Period",
"PmtDate", "PrepaidPrin", "SMM", "Scheduled
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 08/05/2016 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8 May 2016 at 16:18, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> | On 08.05.2016 16:13, carlos cinelli wrote:
>> | > How should I proceed in this case?
>> |
>> | Submit to CRAN.
>>
>> The deeper question
If you're using testthat, check out expect_equal_to_reference.
Hadley
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:45 PM, carlos cinelli
wrote:
> Do you guys have any suggestions on how to store data for unit testing?
>
> I am implementing some methods to estimate matrix entries from the
> marginals. The input of
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am in the midst of some minor revisions to my xtractomatic package, which
> up till now has only been on github. Since ncdf4 for Windows is now
> available from CRAN (and many thanks to whomever is responsib
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
> I do not know devtools:
> If it worked for you for the initial submission and the CRAN team did not
> complain, please resubmit in the same way - and keep in mind you want to
> check the package in advance using a very recent version of R.
And s
Try warningcall(R_NilValue, "message")
Hadley
On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, Aaron King wrote:
> I am in the midst of trying to improve error and warning messages in a
> complex package. I find myself wanting to modify R's default behavior when
> printing warnings. Specifically, it frequently h
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 27/06/2016 9:22 AM, Lenth, Russell V wrote:
>>
>> My package 'lsmeans' is now suddenly broken because of a new provision in
>> the 'tibble' package (loaded by 'dplyr' 0.5.0), whereby the "[[" and "$"
>> methods for 'tbl_df' objects - as d
if x has var in it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Russ
>
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>> On 27/06/2016 9:22 AM, Lenth, Russell V wrote:
>>>>
>>>> My p
I think this sort of meta problem is best solved with svn/git because you
can easily see if the changes you think you made align with the changes you
actually made. Learning svn or git is a lot of work, but the payoff is
worth it.
Hadley
On Friday, July 22, 2016, ProfJCNash wrote:
> In trying t
>> It is really simple: Having _both_ Suggests: foo _and_ an unconditonal
>> call
>> to foo::bar() in the code.
>>
>> Whereas Josh and I argue that it needs to be conditional on requireNames()
>> coming back TRUE.
>
>
> I am feeling particularly dense today. What about "Having _both_ Suggests:
>
One other option is to include the src for libmagic inside your
package, and use that as a fallback if it's not installed on the
system. That gives linux users what they want (linking to the system
package), and windows users what they want (it just works). It only
works for simple libraries, but i
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I am working on preparing a package for submission to CRAN, so using devtools
> i submitted the package to win-builder. I really appreciate that this has
> been setup, so that hopefully any final submission wil
>> A lot of packages have to work around this:
>> https://github.com/search?q=user%3Acran+R_TESTS&type=Code
>
> I wonder if those are mostly there because of cut'n'paste behavior.
It's not something I've ever advocated; I didn't realise there were so
many people unsetting it. (devtools does it for
I wonder if it would be useful for R CMD build to list the files it
ignores? A misspecified .Rbuildignore seems to be reasonable for a
high proportion of weird errors where you have no idea what's going
wrong.
Hadley
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 28/02/2017 10:44 A
Just ignore it.
Hadley
On Friday, April 14, 2017, Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal <
roy.mendelss...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> In my package I have a dataframe that I use but want to hide from the
> user. In Hadley's book on R Packages, he says:
>
> > • If you want to store parsed data, but not ma
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
>> > I don't like the dropping of dimensions either. That doesn't change the
>> > fact that a tibble reacts different from a data.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Göran Broström wrote:
> I am beginning to get complaints from users of my CRAN packages (especially
> 'eha') to the effect that they get error messages like "Error: Unsupported
> use of matrix or array for column indexing".
>
> It turns out that they are sticking i
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
> Where its parent class _sometimes_ returns an atomic vector and
>>
>> _sometimes_ returns a data frame.
>
> Indeed. And a tibble doesn't, so there's a conflict. Nobody said data.frame
> works better than tibble. Actually, we all agree that the l
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Pedro J. Aphalo
wrote:
> What I think is troublesome is that data.frame is part of the definition
> of the R language, and the expectation based on R's normal behaviour is
> that testing with is.data.frame() should be enough to ensure that an
> object can be treate
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Patrick Perry wrote:
> Would it be possible to change tibbles so that
>
> x[,1,drop=TRUE]
>
> returns a vector, not a data frame? I certainly find it surprising that
> tibbles ignore
> the drop argument. If tibbles respeced the drop argument, then package
> develop
> I for one am happy this discussion pops up, because it's a piece of
> information I give to my students as well: convert to a data.frame when you
> start your analysis just to play safe. And this discussion shows why that is
> -for the time being!- a good advice. The moment tibbles become the def
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Joris Meys wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>
>> > I for one am happy this discussion pops up, because it's a piece of
>> > information I give to my students as well: convert to a data.frame when
&
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Patrick Perry wrote:
> Pro ignoring x[,1,drop=TRUE]:
> (1) it forces users to write consistent code for extracting a vector from a
> data frame
>
> Con:
> (1) functions that accept both matrices and data frames might break
> (x[[j]][i] doesn't work for a matrix)
> If that is right -- and I tend to believe it is right -- this change had
> better been done in R core and not on package level. I think the root of
> this evil is design inconsistencies of the language together with the lack
> of removing these inconsistencies. The longer we hesitated, the more
>
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Bill Denney wrote:
>
>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 07:45, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
>>
>> To avoid excessive dependencies, I would like to only register
>> foo.bar() if package A is installed at the time package B is
>> installed. If package A is installed after package B, the
We use this technique in a couple of places:
https://github.com/tidyverse/dbplyr/blob/6be777d8b23d588f19c98de52f4e58f16c2ef67e/R/zzz.R
Basic idea is to call registerS3method() manually, when needed - it's
just a little tricky because the suggested package may be loaded
either before or after your
> This actually is not about Rd format. Indeed, you are using 'roxygen'
> syntax.
This is unrelated to roxygen. \dontrun{} is Rd formatting.
Hadley
--
http://hadley.nz
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/list
> One additional thought:
>
> If the testing package (i.e. testthat in this case) had been available
> but other suggested packages were not, it would be worth running tests
> with just testthat present: that might be why you called the decision
> defensible. I'd agree with that.
>
> However, it'
Who is responsible for the winUCRT checks? Perhaps that person could
provide us with a list of root causes behind the testthat failures,
and we could look into resolving them.
Hadley
On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 7:50 AM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> The current CRAN release of rgl fails on winUCRT becaus
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 9:11 AM Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>
>In the process of trying to get a package to build successfully on
> r-hub's Fedora platform, I had to add a whole bunch of LaTeX .sty files
> to the vignette directory. One of these was collectbox.sty, which
> triggers the NOTE
>
> ---
>
> But for the broader question, Jeff is saying that there really are 700
> packages that are in potential trouble!
I think that's rather an overstatement of the problem — there's
nothing wrong with plyr; it's just no longer under active development.
If anything, plyr is one of the safest packages
d base::apply instead of plyr::aaply.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hadley Wickham
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 11:48 AM
> To: Lenth, Russell V
> Cc: Jeff Newmiller ; r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] [External] Re: What is a "reti
In my experience this NOTE does not interfere with CRAN submission and you
can ignore it.
Hadley
On Monday, September 19, 2022, Igor L wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm testing my package with the devtools::check() function and I got a
> warning about found non-ASCII strings.
>
> These characte
Yes, we will make sure that this is fixed ASAP. There is no need to worry.
Hadley
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 7:32 AM John Harrold wrote:
>
> Howdy Folks,
>
> I got a message from CRAN today telling me that I have a strong reverse
> dependency on the isoband package. But I'm not alone! It look like m
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 9:31 PM Jeff Newmiller wrote:
>
> ... which is why tidyverse functions and Python datetime handling irk me so
> much.
>
> Is tidyverse time handling intrinsically broken? They have a standard
> practice of reading time as UTC and then using force_tz to fix the "mistake".
I’d suggest resubmitting, after ensuring that R CMD check runs without any
notes, warnings, or errors.
Hadley
On Monday, October 10, 2022, Diego Hernangómez Herrero <
diego.hernangomezherr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I have some doubts on how to proceed in this case. I am the developer of
>
Just submit your package, and you'll get an automated email to the old address.
Hadley
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 7:14 AM Andrew Simmons wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm changing my name and my email address. I've got an update I'd like to
> submit to CRAN, I've changed my name and email in my DESCRIPTION.
IMO those functions are so small that you don't need to call them out
in your DESCRIPTION. Just note in a nearby comment where they came
from.
Hadley
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:21 AM David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of my packages copy-pasted some small functions (stuff like `%||%` for
> is
If it's internal only, you could change the name to levels_no()?
Hadley
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 7:28 AM Ulrike Groemping
wrote:
>
> Thanks, Duncan. I appreciate the view that levels.no acts as an S3
> method for the generic levels, if an object of class "no" is handed to
> it. However, as the func
> > it is not expected to use cargo to resolve them from random (possibly
> inaccessible) places
>
> Yes, I agree with you. So, I suggested the possibility of forbidding the
> Git dependency. Or, do you call crates.io, Rust's official repository,
> "random places"? If CRAN cannot trust even the off
> > If CRAN cannot trust even the official one of Rust, why does CRAN have Rust
> > at all?
> >
>
> I don't see the connection - if you downloaded something in the past it
> doesn't mean you will be able to do so in the future. And CRAN has Rust
> because it sounded like a good idea to allow pac
If you're using one of the licenses supported by usethis
(https://usethis.r-lib.org/reference/licenses.html), you can just call
the appropriate function and it will do all the setup required to be
both CRAN and GitHub compatible.
Hadley
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 10:10 AM Emanuele Cordano
wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:02 AM Leonard Mada via R-package-devel
wrote:
>
> Dear Members,
>
> I would like to reanimate the archived package Rpdb:
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rpdb/index.html
>
> 1.) I have tried to contact the original author by email, but got no
> response.
>
> 2.) N
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 2:01 AM Leonard Mada via R-package-devel
wrote:
>
> Dear List-Members,
>
> There are no errors/warnings/notes when I run the check:
>
> ── R CMD check results
> Rpdb 2.3.3
> Duration: 2m 50.1s
>
> 0 errors ✔ | 0
This bug is fixed in the dev version (I don’t remember off the top of my
head in which of pkgdown and roxygen2 you need but it might be both). I’m
planning CRAN updates for both in the near future.
Hadley
On Thursday, January 4, 2024, Daniel Kelley wrote:
> # Question
>
> Is there an online exa
nstalled(package, "as it's used in the reference
> index.")
> 35. base::stop(cnd)
> 36. (function (cnd) …
> 37. cli::cli_abort(message, location = i, name = name, parent = cnd, …
> 38. | rlang::abort(message, ..., call = call, use_cli_format = TRUE, …
> 39. | rlang:
Do you have a pointer to the roxygen2 comments that you're using?
Hadley
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:38 AM Ruff, Sergej
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need help with a package I am currently developing called bootGSEA.
> I noticed that when I try ‘?bootGSEA’ it goes to the help page in R
> itself but not t
Hi Mark,
The cpp11 package is now maintained by Davis Vaughan and we will release a
new version once the C API status is a little cleaner. This warnings
generated from cpp11 will not interfere with your ability to submit your
package; just let CRAN know that the warnings are coming from cpp11.
Ha
devtools::build_win() has an unfortunate name - it's actually more
about checking your package on windows than building a package (and in
the development version we've renamed to check_win()). However,
fortunately, once your package has been accepted on CRAN, you don't
need to worry about building
Or even better, devtools::release(): it walks you through a checklist
of activities designed to make your submission as successful as
possible.
Hadley
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Georgi Boshnakov
wrote:
> You get a source package suitable for submission by running `R CMD check
> namepackag
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 2:45 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen
wrote:
> There are 3 solutions. (1) You (get permission) to change the library to
> GPL. (2) You get permission to change the license of the R code to
> whatever license the library is released under. (3) you split the package.
For complete
For the purposes of CRAN submission, you should basically treat every
NOTE as an ERROR.
Hadley
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:36 AM, Gertjan van den Burg
wrote:
> While waiting to get this message posted to the list, I've solved the
> problem by copying the stdlib rand() and srand() functions into my
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Thierry Onkelinx
>> on Fri, 20 Apr 2018 09:14:44 +0200 writes:
>
> > Dear Alex, Another idea is to use pkgdown
> > (http://pkgdown.r-lib.org) to convert all the
> > documentation of your package (include the vigne
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:57 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 6:13 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>> I got something similar. I have a few thoughts:
>>
>> (1) you should use "if (require(citrus)) { ... }" in your examples;
>> "Suggests" and "Enhances" packages are supposed to be *optional*, i.
I don't think it's related to the error, but you shouldn't be exporting this:
export("align<-.huxtable")
You should generally only export the method.
Hadley
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:00 AM, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following shows an error for my package:
> https://www.r-projec
Does this include automatically (bot) accepted submissions?
Hadley
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:07 AM Uwe Ligges
wrote:
>
> Dear package developers,
>
> the CRAN incoming queue will be closed from Sep 1 to Sep 9. Hence
> package submissions are only possible before and after that period.
>
> Best,
>
I'm pretty certain that seeing this warning indicates that your
`.Rbuildignore` is ignoring something that it shouldn't. You certainly
shouldn't be creating this file by hand.
Hadley
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 12:44 PM Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Can you advise me about this warning in package check:
>
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:03 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 05/09/2018 2:20 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> > I take a complementary approach; I condition on, my home-made,
> > R_TEST_ALL variable. Effectively, I do:
> >
> > if (as.logical(Sys.getenv("R_TEST_ALL", "FALSE"))) {
> > ...
> > }
> >
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:13 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> El vie., 7 sept. 2018 a las 16:03, Ralf Stubner
> () escribió:
> >
> > On 07.09.2018 15:52, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > > For the record, this is what the testthat paper in the R Journal says:
> > >
> > > "[...] I recommend storing your tests in inst/
Looking at the primary CRAN site:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/stringi/index.html, you can
see that the windows binary is still at 1.1.7, suggesting that there's
some build failure. You can see exactly what that is on the CRAN check
page: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_resul
> AzureRMR: the "base" package, provides a number of R6 classes
> AzureVM: a "child" package that extends classes from AzureRMR with extra
> functionality related to virtual machines
> AzureStor: another child package that extends classes from AzureRMR, this
> time for storage accounts
> Etc.
>
>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:14 AM L Rutter wrote:
>
> Hello all:
>
> R CMD check does not complete for my package and halts at the line "*
> checking examples ..." I suspect the halting is due to @examples
> hanging in certain R/foo.R files, where shiny::runApp() is called for
> a shiny app located
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 4:49 PM Fox, John wrote:
>
> Dear r-package-devel list members,
>
> I'd like to create a link to a package vignette from a help file in the same
> package, for example to the "partial-residuals" vignette in the effects
> package from effect.Rd. I'm able to generate a URL
> None of these solutions seem perfect to me. I think that my suggestion is the
> most natural, but as you point out it won’t work in all contexts. Perhaps the
> safest approach is to give the vignette() command in the text of the help
> file, one of your suggestions.
If you do that, and you us
Hi all,
I'd love to get some clarification on what the new internet policy
means for packages like httr:
> Packages which use Internet resources should fail gracefully with an
> informative
> message if the resource is not available (and not give a check warning nor
> error).
It's not clear wh
point me to where all the policies such as this one are posted.
> This may affect a package I have, and one problem I have is different people
> have differing ideas of what defines a "graceful" exit.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roy
>
>
> > On Dec 6, 2018, at 8:22 AM
Can you just set _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false?
env:
global:
# don't treat missing suggested packages as error
- _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=false
I am reasonably certain that is what CRAN uses.
Hadley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:11 AM David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My package Suggests a
You might try reinstalling devtools and dependencies - there was
unfortunately a brief combination of versions that lead to build()
failing to overwrite existing files.
Hadley
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:46 AM Wolfgang Lenhard
wrote:
>
> Many thanks for the remark. It seems, it has something to do
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 2:48 AM Martin Maechler
wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hadley Wickham
> >>>>> on Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:22:47 -0600 writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'd love to get some clarification on what the new internet policy
>
No one else has mentioned it on the thread, so I'd highly recommend
https://happygitwithr.com — it's a guide to git + github specifically
written for R users, and covers many of the common problems people
have when getting set up.
Hadley
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 2:51 AM Troels Ring wrote:
>
> Dea
It appears that the code was added by BDR on 2 Sep 2018:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/d839b1e04e173f90b51ad809ef0bdb18095abe6f
I assume we are seeing failing R CMD check results because
http://worldclockapi.com/api/json/utc/now has recently died.
It would be appreciated if someone from
As of ~7 hours ago, the warning is suppressed:
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/31ee14c620eb1b939acd322f3b5617f998aab8e8
(But the service still doesn't work)
Hadley
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:03 AM Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> It appears that the code was added by BDR on 2 Sep 20
Hi all,
Several people on my team have received responses to their CRAN
submissions from new members of the CRAN team who appear to be student
assistants (judging from their job titles: "Studentischer
administrativer Mitarbeiter"). From the outside, they appear to be
exercising editorial control[^
how many there are, and what backgrounds they have.
Similarly, I don't want to know how much they are paid, just whether
or not they are volunteers or employees.
Hadley
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:23 AM Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Several people on my team have received response
I no longer believe this to be good advice - I think you should only
declare a specific dependency if you want to strongly assert that your
package works with those versions. For example, all tidyverse versions
depend on R 3.2 and later, because we test on all those versions.
Hadley
On Friday, Ju
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
