ress which does not show as such in the
documentation (because of the clickable label) should still be allowed.
With regards
Floris Vanderhaeghe
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> I just tried \doi{10.5281/zenodo.2611233} and it worked.
Sure, but what about making a hyperlink to
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2611233 while showing "text" in the
documentation, as in \href{wwwaddress}{text}. I assume the CRAN note
appears because it wants literal DOI strings in the doc
Op 30/03/2021 om 18:46 schreef Duncan Murdoch:
On 30/03/2021 12:36 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 30/03/2021 10:39 a.m., Floris Vanderhaeghe wrote:
I just tried \doi{10.5281/zenodo.2611233} and it worked.
Sure, but what about making a hyperlink to
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2611233 while
This is a recent addition to R checks. I am pretty sure that \doi{} with the
suggested syntax does produce proper links in the documentation.
Georgi Boshnakov
Indeed, \doi{} produces proper links. But I think the note should not be
triggered when a https://doi.org address is used inside
\href
