Hi,
Cross-posted from SO:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/42776058/extending-an-s3-generic-from-an-optional-package
I have a package which provides an as.FlexTable method for its objects,
extending the S3 generic from the ReporteRs package. So, my NAMESPACE file,
generated by roxygen, has line
Thank you for this info and the suggestion!
David
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 at 09:06, Martin Maechler
wrote:
> >>>>> David Hugh-Jones
> >>>>> on Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:46:35 +0000 writes:
> >>>>> David Hugh-Jones
> >>>>>
ed to writing another package and getting
it on CRAN...
David
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 at 09:06, Martin Maechler
wrote:
> >>>>> David Hugh-Jones
> >>>>> on Tue, 14 Mar 2017 02:46:35 + writes:
> >>>>> David Hugh-Jones
> >>>>&
issue.
Cheers,
David
On 14 March 2017 at 16:35, Martin Maechler
wrote:
> >>>>> David Hugh-Jones
> >>>>> on Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:26:49 + writes:
>
> > Just out of interest, what would happen if I used the hacky solution
> of
> > s
Before building my package, I manually place both pdf and html versions of
my vignettes into inst/doc. I then build the package with `devtools::check`.
Listing of the resulting tarball:
-rw-r--r-- 0 david staff1692 6 Apr 15:10
huxtable/inst/doc/design-principles.R
-rw-r--r-- 0 david sta
Okay, so this got tumbleweeded... so should I file a bug?
D
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 at 15:37, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> Before building my package, I manually place both pdf and html versions of
> my vignettes into inst/doc. I then build the package with `devtools::check`.
>
>
tools, but the vignette sources should be placed in
> ./vignettes and then R CMD build will put the files into the relevant
> places automatically.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 07.04.2017 07:55, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
>
>> Okay, so this got tumb
accident listed in
> Rbuildignore, right?
>
>
>
>
> From: R-package-devel on behalf
> of Uwe Ligges
> Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 12:20
> To: David Hugh-Jones
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD ch
m19kx9o7dz/huxtable_0.2.0.tar.gz?dl=0
Cheers,
David Hugh-Jones
On 7 April 2017 at 11:20, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
> Can you send the tarball please, I can take a look,
>
>> Uwe
>
>>
>>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
Two questions:
1. If your package definitely needs to call View(), and you want to explain
how that will look, then why not show one or more screenshots in your
documentation?
2. Why does your package need to call View? Why can't it return the
metadata as a data frame, and let the user do what he
ted the
> following problems:
>
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> Maintainer: ‘David Hugh-Jones ’
>
> Found the following (possibly) invalid URLs:
> URL: http://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/huxtable/index.html
> From: README.md
> CRAN URL not in canon
it for them.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> On 04/20/2017 03:38 AM, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Duncan,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for taking the time to look at this.
>>>
>>&g
Hi guys
I have a vignette for my anim.plots package, which is inevitably very large
as it demonstrates many animations. I'd like to include the .Rmd file, but
not the
pre-built HTML and image files. Then I'll have a short stub vignette which
tells the user how to build the real vignette him or her
>From what you say it sounds as if your package fails on Windows because,
well, it doesn't work on Windows, given that doMC isn't available. Trying
to hide that would seem weird. Does CRAN insist that all packages should
work on all platforms?
On Mon, 15 May 2017 at 19:40, Christopher Lalansingh <
Hello all,
A short while ago I released the "huxtable" package for writing HTML and
LaTeX tables:
https://www.github.com/hughjonesd/huxtable
The name seemed cute to me, but I later found out that to Americans it has
special associations. The Huxtables were the family in the Cosby show. That
would
d you can choose the name you prefer. If you feel
> uncomfortable with the current one then change it. I do not think anyone
> else's opinion is relevant unless a package author picks a name that all
> right thinking people would find offensive.
>
>
> On 11/06/2017 14:51, David
These replies seem to be missing the point, which is that old code has to
be rewritten because tibbles don't behave like data frames.
It is true that subclasses can override behaviour, but there is an implicit
contract that the same methods should do the same things.
The as.xxx pattern seems weir
In roxygen2 you do
@section Section name:
The colon is important.
David
On 1 October 2017 at 19:50, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 01/10/2017 12:42 PM, Mohammad Tanvir Ahamed via R-package-devel wrote:
>
>> I am building package R-studio (Roxygen2).
>> In the package function documentation, now t
One question that comes to mind: what's the synergy? I e why are units and
errors best handled together? I use standard errors a lot, but never
units... I would like a standard way to represent uncertainty but don't
think I need the other stuff.
Cheers,
D
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 17:25, Iñaki Úcar w
Many measurements have no unit, but some uncertainty - e.g. the b and se
from an arbitrary regression. Can you give specific examples of the
advantages from binding these packages tightly together?
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 21:23, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> El 6 oct. 2017 19:13, "David Hu
ers,
David
On 7 October 2017 at 13:00, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> 2017-10-06 22:28 GMT+02:00 David Hugh-Jones :
> > Many measurements have no unit, but some uncertainty - e.g. the b and se
> > from an arbitrary regression. Can you give specific examples of the
> > advantages from
Could you not just skip these particular tests using skip_on_cran()?
David
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Hi,
I'm considering submitting the package onetime (
https://github.com/hughjonesd/onetime/) to CRAN.
Onetime has functions for showing a message or warning only once (ever per
user). It does this by writing to a file in the user's configuration
directory, as reported by rappdirs::user_config_dir
m: R-package-devel On Behalf
> Of Dirk Eddelbuettel
> Sent: Sunday, 6 November 2022 9:29 am
> To: David Hugh-Jones
> Cc: R package devel
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Writing to users config directory for CRAN
> package
>
>
> On 5 November 2022 at 19:32, Da
Hi all,
I see some questions coming up repeatedly here…. Would it help to have a
FAQ to point at?
I’d be happy to help though I’m no expert.
Cheers,
David
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-pro
Hi,
One of my packages copy-pasted some small functions (stuff like `%||%` for
is.null) from ggplot2. (Both packages are MIT-licensed.)
What is an appropriate way to acknowledge this in the DESCRIPTION Author:
or Authors@R section? (Note that the list of ggplot2 authors is long and
changing.)
Ch
Thank you both. This sounds sensible. Yeah, add my vote for `base::%||%`!!
David
On Thu, 4 May 2023 at 10:00, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 04/05/2023 4:53 a.m., Ivan Krylov wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 May 2023 09:21:17 +0100
> > David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> >
> >> One o
Dear R packagers,
This isn't strictly about packaging but I thought you guys might have the
most relevant expertise. I'm looking for a source of online help for R base
packages, which covers all versions (for some reasonable value of "all").
So e.g. the equivalent of `?lm` for R 4.1.0.
Is there an
That’s useful to know. But is there anywhere with preformatted HTML pages?
Cheers, D
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 21:46, Ivan Krylov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 20:22:47 +0100
> David Hugh-Jones wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for a source of online help for R base
> > packages,
let it serve the
> relevant docs.
>
> Dunno of anyone doing this historical dive online for you though. Why
> would you want preformatted docs if you didn't have those old versions
> installed?
>
> On June 29, 2023 4:23:55 PM PDT, David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gm
Static web pages get indexed by google.
David
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 09:55, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> Why store them? Download the source on demand, and convert it. Seems
> pretty simple.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> On 30/06/2023 1:19 a.m., David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> > T
to know if it’s possible to create 00index files without
installing the relevant package? (Loading R 0.60 is challenging…)
D
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 13:02, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 30/06/2023 7:57 a.m., David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> > Static web pages get indexed by google.
>
>
eport bugs if you find any.
Cheers,
David
On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 13:23, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
>
> There are plenty of places to find current docs. I think it’s fine to have
> versioned ones also. I agree it would be a good idea to clearly signal
> “hey, this is an old version” -
o to
> > this help page in the next (previous) version of R" (if it's not a huge
> > pain)
> >
> > On 2023-06-30 11:10 a.m., David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> >> OK, so I took Jeff's hint and did this myself!
> >>
> >> https://github.com/hu
Aside from the package question, surely the other issue here is that Prof
Ripley’s email is extraordinarily rude. Any paid employee would be sacked
for that. I appreciate R and CRAN are volunteer-run organisations, but I
don’t think that should be an excuse for this level of, frankly, toxicity.
Why
appy to redo.
>
> So *please* do not misuse such a public mailing list and do keep
> your private opinions private in such a case in the future!
>
> >>>>> Spencer Graves on Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:29:29 -0500 writes:
>
> > On 11/2/23 2:52 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
If I understand correctly, the current procedure is that the client
downloads every package name from CRAN, and then checks its name is
unique. Wouldn’t
it be faster (for both parties) to check name uniqueness directly on the
server?
Writing: wyclif.substack.com
Book: www.wyclifsdust.com
On Tue
Hi Andriy
Renaming the packages seems quite drastic. It’ll break existing code and
the packages’ dependencies, and any existing name recognition will be lost.
I’m also a bit sceptical that it will greatly affect discoverability: I
don’t think most users find packages by scrolling through the big
a
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new version of my "huxtable" package. It is
currently failing reverse dependency checks for two packages (homnormal and
RSStest). The relevant failures are below.
I got this failure one time, and fixed the problem, which relates to
mistakenly relying on the Suggeste
her approaches include rhub2.
>
> Best,
>
> Lluís
>
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 at 10:24, David Hugh-Jones
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to upload a new version of my "huxtable" package. It is
>> currently failing reverse dep
This surprised me, even though it shouldn’t have done. (My false internal
model of the world was that oo <- options(); … options(oo) would overwrite
the entire options list with the old values.) I wonder if it would be worth
pointing out explicitly in ?options.
Writing: wyclif.substack.com
Book: w
Hi guys,
I've been having some problems with updating my 'huxtable' package on CRAN.
The latest issue is that I run a test which renders a rmarkdown document to
PDF, using rmarkdown::render. This passes R CMD check fine on my machine,
on travis and on win-builder, but fails on the CRAN machines as
Hi Dirk
Not running the test on CRAN would fix the problem, but it is kind of an
admission of failure. Part of CRAN's point is quality control, so switching
off tests just to pass seems perverse. I'll do it if that is the only
option.
Yes, I bet the CRAN guys are highly busy, and full respect to
Why not remove the references and instead put them in the package citation
info?
On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 at 20:35, Dudek Andrzej wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've stuck in submitting new version of package(mdsOpt), due to the
> following note,
>
> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
> De (13:2)
>
Hi all,
Latest release of my package has an error when checked on r-patched-linux
and r-devel-linux. Relevant output is shown below (from
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_huxtable.html). It
suggests that there's no method for `align<-` and `bold` for huxtable
objects. In fact th
Thank you very much for this thoughtful advice! I am guessing that
getNamespace("huxtable") would be another more self-documenting way to do
this. I will make the change.
David
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 13:26, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>
> I'd worry a little bit about your "make_getter_setters" functi
Hi all,
The following shows an error for my package:
https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-linux-x86_64/huxtable-00check.html
Here's an excerpt:
> ### ** Examples
>
>
> ht <- huxtable(a = 1:3, b = 1:3)
> align(ht) <- 'right'
Error in UseMethod("align<-") :
no applicable method for
I figured that. Actually I just tried this. I now get the interesting
result that all calls to a generic fail with the UseMethod error...?
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018 at 16:12, Joris Meys wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Hadley Wickham
> wrote:
>
>> I don't think it's related to the error, but y
Wow, this is extremely helpful. I've applied Joris' patch. By the way, the
github master has the change that I stopped exporting methods, as per
Hadley's suggestion; this caused *all* functions created via
make_getter_setters to fail. Version 4.0.1 on CRAN has the methods
exported, which was maskin
Agreed. I fixed the roxygen2 and it works fine. But yet, the original
v4.0.1 on CRAN has a namespace file which contains
S3method(bold,huxtable)
export(bold)
export(bold.huxtable)
and
S3method("align<-",huxtable)
export("align<-")
export("align<-.huxtable")
yet still fails on linux-patched and
l. 2018 20:06, Duncan Murdoch
> escribió:
>
>> On 05/07/2018 9:11 AM, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
>> >
>> > Agreed. I fixed the roxygen2 and it works fine. But yet, the original
>> > v4.0.1 on CRAN has a namespace file which contains
>> >
>> > S3m
That will indeed fail everywhere. The puzzle is why it fails (only
sometimes) when the methods are all exported. The GitHub equivalent is tag
v4.0.1-rc1.
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 at 20:43, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
>
>
> El jue., 5 jul. 2018 21:35, David Hugh-Jones
> escribió:
>
>> I
Hi all,
Just updated my rcheology package with data on functions for R 3.5.1 (no
change from R 3.5.0 afaik). See https://github.com/hughjonesd/rcheology.
I'm wondering how to version this package. It's not on CRAN yet so it would
be good to get things right.
Possibilities:
* Just copy the R ver
t thought it had been lost!
>
> The link in the GitHub description appears broken, however.
>
> On 10 July 2018 at 23:59, David Hugh-Jones
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just updated my rcheology package with data on functions for R 3.5.1 (no
> > change fro
Hi Russ,
Possibly relevant: the modelgenerics package (on GitHub) does exactly what
you're suggesting for standard model functions like `nobs` etc. I think at
some point it is going to become part of the tidyverse.
D
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 at 02:24, Lenth, Russell V
wrote:
> Package developers,
Hi Russell,
That's v helpful and I am going to try it myself. Can I just ask what goes
in your namespace file (and what roxygen tags you use) for the relevant
methods?
David
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 at 02:29, Lenth, Russell V
wrote:
> Thanks to all who responded. I am pleased to say that with your
Hi all,
A simple solution - if indeed you want to go down this route - is to use
options() and getOption(), ensuring all options are namespaced, e.g. by
prefixing them with the package name.
David
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 at 17:15, Alexandre Courtiol <
alexandre.court...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Samu
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 01:16, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>
>
> When packages delete tests just for CRAN, the quality of the repository
> suffers. Users should be able to check an install by running the tests
> that passed on CRAN and seeing them pass on their system as well.
In my limited experience
On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 09:01, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
>
> I think it's useful to think of 3 groups who might run tests:
>
> - authors
> - CRAN
> - other users of a package.
>
> What Hadley was arguing for is that CRAN should identify itself to a
> package, so that by default a package could ru
Perhaps the documentation could be clearer, though. (I've been confused by
it also.) How about:
adj allows adjustment of the text with respect to (x, y). Values of 0, 0.5
and 1 specify that text will appear right of/above, centred around, and
left of/below the anchor point, respectively.
On Wed,
My package had this issue and still got accepted. I think it is a known
transient glitch. Just mention it when you submit.
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 22:05, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> Does it happen consistently? If it's only happened once, could be a
> transient glitch in package dependencies. I'd tr
Hi,
My package Suggests a package that relies on R >= 3.5.0. My package works
fine with earlier R, though. When travis runs R CMD check on R-oldrel,
therefore, it fails because it can't install the suggested package.
Is this going to stop me submitting to CRAN? I don't really want to require
R 3.
t, i.e. wrap uses of the suggested package in
>
> if (requireNamespace(...)) { ... }
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
>
> >
> > Hadley
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:11 AM David Hugh-Jones
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >&
Yes, I certainly will do that. I've checked on win-builder and the package
seems to pass, so my examples seem to be in good order.
David
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 15:17, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 8 December 2018 at 14:41, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> | Thanks guys. If CRA
Hi all,
My package has errors on CRAN's Linux and Solaris:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_huxtable.html
which I can't reproduce on my local OSX Machine, nor on Linux on Travis.
Does anyone have any general hints on how to reproduce and/or debug such
errors?
Specifically th
hink your test test should write to a file in [a
> subdirectory of]] tempdir(), not to a file in the current directory.
>
> comes from
> Bill Dunlap
> TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:50 AM David Hugh-Jones
> wrote:
> >
>
; > Bill Dunlap
> > TIBCO Software
> > wdunlap tibco.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:50 AM David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> My package has errors on CRAN&#x
Thank you! Got it. This should be close enough to CRAN, and there’s a
Docker image available too.
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 00:40, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13/03/2019 8:34 p.m., David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys
> >
> > That might be it. But there was no err
;
>
>
> Den torsdag 14 mars 2019 08:48:34 CET, David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gmail.com> skrev:
>
>
> Thank you! Got it. This should be close enough to CRAN, and there’s a
> Docker image available too.
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 00:40, Duncan Murdoch
> wr
Is “conflicted” in your DESCRIPTION file? Btw, can we see the package
source somewhere?
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 19:24, cartograf...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Yes!
>
> Le mercredi 3 avril 2019 à 20:21:59 UTC+2, Ben Bolker <
> bbol...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Have you installed the 'conflicted' pac
Joris,
I have no dog in this fight, but I think you should cool down a bit. Hadley
explained why he thought these people were students: it’s the adjective
studentische in the job description. I don’t think he meant, or implied,
any disrespect to the individuals concerned. He is entitled to ask in
Hi all,
Not for the first time, my package has a bug that isn't found on rhub,
travis, appveyor, or my local machine, but is found on CRAN. This time it's
Windows-only, so I can't even download a Docker image and investigate that
way.
TBH I am not very enthused by having to treat CRAN servers as
at 23:26, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 12/06/2019 4:57 p.m., David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Not for the first time, my package has a bug that isn't found on rhub,
> > travis, appveyor, or my local machine, but is found on CRAN. This time
> it's
&g
st mechanisms are not use and hence output does not show what
> the actual test was.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
>
> On 13.06.2019 06:59, David Hugh-Jones wrote:
> > Hi Duncan,
> >
> > Of course I appreciate the value of a centralised repository, and I
>
That is true. But the test doesn’t fail on my machine, or several others,
so I still wonder how I am going to debug it.
On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 10:54, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2019 at 10:41, David Hugh-Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > Well, the test that fails is this one:
The warning is from devtools::document() rather than R CMD check itself.
You should still fix it though!
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 12:05, Sigbert Klinke
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I called check() on my package I got a warning at the beginning
>
> Updating plot.matrix documentation
> Warnung: roxygen2
Oops! Sorry for the spam.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 14:02, David Hugh-Jones
wrote:
> The warning is from devtools::document() rather than R CMD check itself.
> You should still fix it though!
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 at 12:05, Sigbert Klinke
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>&g
Hi all,
A meta-question: I am developing a new package (
https://github.com/hughjonesd/santoku) and I would like to ask some
questions. But they are not about e.g. R CMD check or CRAN submission -
instead they're more abstract questions of software design. Is this the
right place to ask?
Cheers,
Hi Wolfgang,
You can use the CITATION file. See ?citation and ?bibentry.
Cheers,
David
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 08:55, Wolfgang Lenhard <
wolfgang.lenh...@uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
> Hello world,
> is there a standard way of adding references (scientific papers ...) to
> the description file in R
If you click on the “check” log in travis, you will find:
* checking data for ASCII and uncompressed saves ... WARNING
1411
1412 Note: significantly better compression could be obtained
1413 by using R CMD build --resave-data
(Excuse the poor formatting – posting from my phone.)
This suggests y
I would be in favour. I actually used R for several years before figuring
out that the vignette was usually where the useful introduction was. Until
then I was like “R help is way too technical”
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 13:26, Joris Meys wrote:
> Dear Dr. Vichtbauer,
>
> I'm not a CRAN member, but
Hi all,
Philosophical question. My package follows semantic versioning (
https://semver.org). Incompatible API changes should trigger a major
version upgrade. OK, but what counts as an incompatible change to an R API?
Suppose my current function signature is
foo <- function (a, b, c, d)
and the
default values
> because the positional behaviour has changed.
>
> On September 25, 2019 6:51:58 AM PDT, David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Philosophical question. My package follows semantic versioning (
> >https://semver.o
have the opportunity to be precise in
> your API definition.) It is really bad to have silent changes in behavior,
> and precision in specification is crucial to avoid that if you distribute
> packages.
>
> On September 25, 2019 7:27:25 AM PDT, David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo
The other obvious online checker is rhub, via the rhub package.
David
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 21:39, Jonathan Greenberg wrote:
> One of the issues I'm running into is that it seems every time there's a
> Mac update something gets broken with regards to compilers, making it
> incredibly challengi
Hi all,
My package defines the following method and generic:
chop <- function (x, ...) UseMethod("chop")
chop.default <- function (x, breaks, labels, extend = NULL, drop = TRUE) {
... }
R CMD check then gives a warning:
W checking S3 generic/method consistency (695ms)
chop:
function(x
Gabor
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 10:56 AM David Hugh-Jones
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > My package defines the following method and generic:
> >
> > chop <- function (x, ...) UseMethod("chop")
> >
> > chop.default <
to think this is a bad thing. R does encourage lenient argument
> checking... what rock have you been under for the last 20 years?
>
> On March 8, 2020 5:41:51 AM PDT, David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >You're quite right :-) But I think the polemic
behaviors that are
> typically enabled using class-specific arguments (e.g. plot). You cannot
> support both fully-generic calls and class-specific calls without giving
> the generic some flexibility that won't get used in some cases.
>
>
> On March 8, 2020 9:41:51 AM PDT, David
Hi,
I'd like to build a rmarkdown vignette with my own choice of fonts – I'm
pernickety about look and feel.
R CMD check will rebuild vignettes in the vignettes/ directory, and if
relevant fonts aren't on the build machine, it'll give a warning.
Here are the options I can think of:
* build vigne
n the versions of dependencies.
> Maybe something similar is possible for fonts (I have no idea).
>
> Maëlle.
>
> Den tisdag 2 juni 2020 20:14:24 CEST, David Hugh-Jones <
> davidhughjo...@gmail.com> skrev:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to build a rmarkdown
On this note, I just got
Non-file package-anchored link(s) in documentation object
'brk_width-for-datetime.Rd':
‘[lubridate:%m+%]{lubridate::add_with_rollback()}’
The correct filename appears to be %m+% in the lubridate help. Can anyone
tell me the right way to format this? I would work it out
; From: R-package-devel On Behalf
> Of David Hugh-Jones
> Sent: 16 June 2020 07:51
> To: Duncan Murdoch
> Cc: List r-package-devel
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] check cross-references error: Non-file
> package-anchored link(s)
>
> On this note, I just got
>
> Non-file pack
Hi all,
I submitted a package update to CRAN (package "huxtable") and got a couple
of NOTES and the usual message about replying-all if I thought the NOTES
were false positives. Rightly or wrongly, I did think this, so I replied
all with my explanation. This was a week ago. I have not yet heard ba
gt; Department of Computer Science
> University of Manitoba
> maxturgeon.ca
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* R-package-devel on behalf
> of David Hugh-Jones
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 17, 2020 2:55 PM
> *To:* R package devel
> *Subject:* [R-pkg-devel] How long to wait before resending
95 matches
Mail list logo
