On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> [ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a
> mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It
> also means I can't reply (easily) inline now. ]
>
> In most cases environment varia
user with default
values. Therefore, there is another function, convenient_modify_matrix():
convenient_modify_matrix(mat) <- function(mat) modify_matrix(mat, other_args =
default).
To help verify that the code is correct, I want to check the result from
identical() below:
set.seed(20250514
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 10:51 AM, Tim Taylor
wrote:
> I'd just use all.equal but I think you could just check the call is
> constructed correctly, e.g.
>
> convenient_modify_matrix <- function(mat) modify_matrix(mat, other_args =
> default)
>
> identical(
> body(convenient_modify_mat
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 10:33 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel
wrote:
>
>
> Section 'A.3.1.3 Intel MKL' of the R Installation and Administration manual
> covers that for the MKL case (and general OpenMP cases)
>
> The default number of threads will be chosen by the OpenMP software, but
> c
[ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a
mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It
also means I can't reply (easily) inline now. ]
In most cases environment variables need to be set before the process
starts. Setting them inside the
On Wed, 14 May 2025, at 4:18 PM, smallepsilon wrote:
> No need to apologize. I hope the following example helps clarify what I
> mean. Suppose that modify_matrix(mat, other_args) is a function that,
> among other things, applies eigen() to mat. For good reasons,
> other_args has no default valu
eck the result from
identical() below:
|
| set.seed(20250514)
| A <- modify_matrix(mat, other_args = default)
| set.seed(20250514)
| B <- convenient_modify_matrix(mat)
| identical(A, B)
|
| In an ideal world, the result would be TRUE. The results can differ, though,
because of multi
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 12:59 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:46 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
>
> > [ If you could, please set your email software up such that posts to a
> > mailing lists are not signed, it makes reading them more cumbersome. It
>
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 2:51 PM, Ivan Krylov
wrote:
> > My submission was rejected, not because of test failures, but because
> > I had "removed the failing tests which is not the idea of tests." No
> > errors/warnings/notes were reported to me.
>
>
> Try measuring the test coverage of
В Tue, 13 May 2025 17:05:14 +
smallepsilon пишет:
> In many package tests, I want to verify that two ways of specifying
> something lead to the execution of exactly the same calculations.
Would you like to try tracing the linear algebra calculations
themselves (together with their arguments)
> On 14 May 2025, at 02:21, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
…
> There is a higher-level README linked from CRAN package pages but I can't
> find it now :-/
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_issue_kinds.html I believe
Tim
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
