On 2025-03-31 12:00 p.m., Jerome Braun wrote:
Hi Duncan!
> Since the compiler will supply stdbool.h, it's safer to use that
than to try to emulate it.
Understood. It seems like the definitions are exactly the same between
the two.
Currently there is no use of "bool" in any of the code (a
Hi!
I'm currently the maintainer of AlgDesign, though my C skill is clearly a
little too low for the task.
It has become necessary for me to fix some issues with the code that had
defined true, false, and bool in the header file (wheeler.h).
Lines 23 and 24 currently have:
#define true 1
#def
Do you want to use instead of your macros?
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/stdbool.h.html
On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, 12:37 AM Jerome Braun
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm currently the maintainer of AlgDesign, though my C skill is clearly a
> little too low for the task.
>
> It has
On 2025-03-31 9:28 a.m., Jerome Braun wrote:
Hi Michael!
I'd like to make the smallest change possible to Bob Wheeler's original
code so I'm not sure if using is the best route forward.
I do see that the definitions are the same there. Is there a low-cost way
to use that header file or just t
Hi Duncan!
> Since the compiler will supply stdbool.h, it's safer to use that than to
try to emulate it.
Understood. It seems like the definitions are exactly the same between the
two.
Currently there is no use of "bool" in any of the code (after having
changed bool to int everywhere in the cod
Hi Michael!
I'd like to make the smallest change possible to Bob Wheeler's original
code so I'm not sure if using is the best route forward.
I do see that the definitions are the same there. Is there a low-cost way
to use that header file or just those definitions?
Thank you!
--
Jerome
On
