Dear all,
I notice that there is a note from CRAN package check results for our
package as follows:
Version: 1.4.1
Check: installed package size
Result: NOTE
installed size is 5.3Mb
sub-directories of 1Mb or more:
libs 5.2Mb
The link to our package is here:
https://cran.r-project.
On 28/09/2020 11:10 a.m., Yicheng Yang wrote:
Dear all,
I notice that there is a note from CRAN package check results for our
package as follows:
Version: 1.4.1
Check: installed package size
Result: NOTE
installed size is 5.3Mb
sub-directories of 1Mb or more:
libs 5.2Mb
The l
Hi,
I am using package 'revdepcheck' to check reverse dependencies of a package and
it works great. But now I have a scenario such that I wish it to use a local
version of one of the dependencies of the checked package and am not able to
find out how.
Some context: Package A imports package B.
On 28 September 2020 at 17:17, Georgi Boshnakov wrote:
| I am using package 'revdepcheck' to check reverse dependencies of a package
and it works great. But now I have a scenario such that I wish it to use a
local version of one of the dependencies of the checked package and am not able
to fin
You can define the special dependency of the revdep-checked package in
the `Remotes` field. More info:
https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/remotes/vignettes/dependencies.html
E.g. if you are revdep-checking package PKG, then you can add
something like this in the DESCRIPTION file of PKG:
Remotes
Thanks, adding remotes to DESCRIPTION did what I was after.
For reference (including me), here is an outline of a possible workflow:
1. run revdep_check(), with many reverse dependencies something like
revdep_check(num_workers = 4)
speeds the things up dramatically.
2, if there are fai
Indeed, in this case, the CRAN team will let is pass anyway.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 28.09.2020 18:41, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 28/09/2020 11:10 a.m., Yicheng Yang wrote:
Dear all,
I notice that there is a note from CRAN package check results for our
package as follows:
Version: 1.4.1
Check: ins
Dear Uwe and Duncan,
Thanks a lot for your patient explanations. Because this problem is not an
urgent error now, we will try to minimize the libs in our package regarding
your suggestions in the next updates for other reasons. If we still can not
meet this requirement of package size in the next
