Dear all,
I have two variables, foo and bar. The first is TRUE if a png should be
created and the second is TRUE if an already existing one should be
overwritten.
At the end of the plot I had
if (foo | (foo & bar)) dev.off()
This worked as expected in all versions of my package built in R up t
Le 22/07/2020 à 14:36, Helmut Schütz a écrit :
Dear all,
I have two variables, foo and bar. The first is TRUE if a png should be
created and the second is TRUE if an already existing one should be
overwritten.
At the end of the plot I had
if (foo | (foo & bar)) dev.off()
This worked as expect
I suspect your foo and bar variables are not logical anymore... insufficient
info. However, why aren't you using short-circuit && and || operators?
On July 22, 2020 5:36:06 AM PDT, "Helmut Schütz"
wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I have two variables, foo and bar. The first is TRUE if a png should be
>
>cr
On 22/07/2020 8:36 a.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
Dear all,
I have two variables, foo and bar. The first is TRUE if a png should be
created and the second is TRUE if an already existing one should be
overwritten.
At the end of the plot I had
if (foo | (foo & bar)) dev.off()
This worked as expected i
Hi Serguei,
Serguei Sokol wrote on 2020-07-22 15:51:
Hmm... I see 2 possibilities for still getting an error while the
concerned part of code is not supposed to be run:
- either you are running not updated version of your package;
I _can_ built the package and it runs as intended. Only the
On 22/07/2020 1:25 p.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
Hi Serguei,
Serguei Sokol wrote on 2020-07-22 15:51:
Hmm... I see 2 possibilities for still getting an error while the
concerned part of code is not supposed to be run:
- either you are running not updated version of your package;
I _can_ built
Following WRE 1.5.6 (Namespaces with S4 classes and methods), you should
have "Depends: methods" in your DESCRIPTION, and "import(methods)" or a
more selective "importFrom(methods, ...)" directive in your NAMESPACE.
Then you would usually use the NAMESPACE directive
importMethodsFrom(package,
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 2020-07-22 21:42:
> On 22/07/2020 1:25 p.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
>> [...]
>> The problem is that I cannot reproduce it as well. Only CHECK laments
>> about dev.off() which I changed to graphics.off() in the meantime.
>>
>> library(grDevices)
>> foo <- TRUE # shall we p
On 22/07/2020 5:40 p.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 2020-07-22 21:42:
On 22/07/2020 1:25 p.m., Helmut Schütz wrote:
[...]
The problem is that I cannot reproduce it as well. Only CHECK laments
about dev.off() which I changed to graphics.off() in the meantime.
library(grDevic
Hello R-pkg-devel,
Our package vcfR,
https://github.com/knausb/vcfR
has been removed from CRAN because they asked me to make changes that I
have not been able to make before their deadline. One of the issues was
that the moniker
"briank.lists"
is not appropriate and that we should see CRAN pol
Once all the other issues are resolved, I'd suggest e-mailing
r-cran-submissions with this explanation and asking for clarification.
My interpretation would have been the same as yours (i.e., that
this is an appropriate e-mail address, and that CRAN maintainers may
have misinterpreted
11 matches
Mail list logo
