On 05.02.2020 04:44, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
In your examples.
On February 4, 2020 5:53:08 PM PST, Marcelo Araya Salas
wrote:
Hi all
I got this error from CRAN tests:
Warning: parse error in file 'Rraven-Ex.R':
'\.' is an unrecognized escape in character string starting ""\."
... Where
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:51 PM Guido Kraemer wrote:
> I have also set `~/.R/Makevars.win` as suggested in the manual "Writing
> R extensions", Section 1.2.5 "Using C++14 code".
What exactly do you have in src/Makevars.win? Just the simple CXX_STD
= CXX14 or the more complex set-up from the end of
On 5 February 2020 at 11:47, Ralf Stubner wrote:
| On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:51 PM Guido Kraemer wrote:
| > I have also set `~/.R/Makevars.win` as suggested in the manual "Writing
| > R extensions", Section 1.2.5 "Using C++14 code".
|
| What exactly do you have in src/Makevars.win? Just the simp
Hi everyone,
My `countrycode` package ships with two data frames of characters in several
languages: codelist and codelist_panel.
I converted all strings to UTF-8 using the `enc2utf8` function, but I also
tried several other ways, with the stringi package, etc. As far as I can tell,
the string
We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental'
Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than
all other containers to build and check several packages we maintain.
This affects everything, including example timings, where this
architecture is the o
Can you please show some numbers?
Thanks,
Gabor
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 2:40 PM Brian G. Peterson wrote:
>
> We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental'
> Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than
> all other containers to build and check
Dear all,
for a package that is already published on CRAN, we plan to include a
function that relies on the M3C-package, which is on Bioconductor only.
Since this function in M3C is not essential for most other functions of our
package, we thought about adding M3C to the "Suggests" field in the
DE
On 05.02.2020 16:05, Daniel Lüdecke wrote:
Dear all,
for a package that is already published on CRAN, we plan to include a
function that relies on the M3C-package, which is on Bioconductor only.
Since this function in M3C is not essential for most other functions of our
package, we thought ab
Thanks for the quick reply! I was a bit uncertain about this due to the CRAN
check notes from this package:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BiocManager.html
That made me think that the reason why the packages which are not available for
testing are hosted on Bioconductor.
Da
For every other architecture, Travis-CI and R-Hub take approximately
10-12 minutes to build and check PerformanceAnalytics. On the Windows
Rtools4 experimental toolchain, the build/check on Winbuilder and R-Hub
take over an hour, sometimes as much as an hour and a half.
Non-trivial example timin
Then this is specific to your package, see the overall timings for the
whole CRAN check:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_timings.html
which is 2379156 sec for old and 2516120 sec for the new toolchain, i.e.
roughly a 6%. Given the machines runs with very different loads it could
e
On 05.02.2020 16:42, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Then this is specific to your package,
I meant the new one, not the one on CRAN which is also similarly quick
(less than 10% difference).
Best,
Uwe Ligges
see the overall timings for the
whole CRAN check:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check
On 5 February 2020 at 08:39, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
| We've noticed over the past week that Winbuilder/R-Hub's 'experimental'
Are you refering to winbuilder, or to rhub?
| Rtools4 toolchain images for Windows are approximately 4-5x slower than
| all other containers to build and check several
Thanks to all who responded.
Correct that package ‘karon’ is the problem. The current package has a more
meaningful name. ‘karon’ was the earlier name; functions have been renamed.
I deleted all the old function files, though they had been Committed to GitHub.
A colleague working with me wro
14 matches
Mail list logo
