Hi David,
if you only see
install for i386
* installing *source* package 'pense' ...
** using staged installation
[]
install for x64
* installing *source* package 'pense' ...
** using non-staged installation
[...]
then everything is fine, there is no NOTE here, AFAICT.
If you see a NOTE abo
In my package, the error `base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos =
"CheckExEnv")` occurred.
I cannot understand or fix it.
What should I do ?
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.eth
On 26.03.2019 10:12, Camford Oxbridge wrote:
In my package, the error `base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos =
"CheckExEnv")` occurred.
Not an error, this is part of the check scripts.
Please report the full output of the check.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
I cannot understand or fix it.
What
Apologies for out-of-thread reply.
The only feasible solutions are to maintain an off-CRAN (say drat)
repository with binary packages you have built yourself, or use the
existing CRAN infrastructure (rwinlib for Windows, etc., for which the
rgdal, sf, gdalUtils, and other package maintainers a
Dear Gábor,
Oddly, it does emit a NOTE due to the non-staged install, as can be seen at
https://win-builder.r-project.org/86i67mqTD9YY
The package source can be found at
https://github.com/dakep/pense-rpkg/tree/release/1.2.2
Thanks for your help,
David
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 3:28 AM Gábor Csárd
On Windows I have a package that builds just fine with any recent version
of Rtools. But on win-builder it fails because the version of GNU make on
that machine does not support if-else syntax. Support for this syntax was
added in GNU make 3.81, which was released in 2006. The version of Rtools
on
Hi, l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use r-devel?
I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made
dev_tool::check.
How can I solve my problem ?
Thanks in advance Sylvain
nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe
FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’
New submission
Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTI
OK, here is what I think is going on.
There is a bug in the check code, that creates a false positive when
the package installation is performed with `--merge-multiarch`. In
this case the x64 architecture uses a non-staged install,
deliberately, but the check code still picks this up and reports i
Thanks, Gábor, for taking the time to investigate the issue and the
detailed elaboration!
I resubmitted to CRAN with a brief explanation and a link to this thread.
Thanks,
David
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:55 PM Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> OK, here is what I think is going on.
>
> There is a bug in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
