Please submit again, perhaps a race cndition on one of the incoming
check machines that instaled corpus when your package was checked?
If this persists, pls write to in
response to the auto-rejection.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.12.2018 07:28, Dalthorp, Daniel via R-package-devel wrote:
Su
Hi,
A package I recently submitted to CRAN includes an S4 class that defines a
method to coerce from that class to a numeric vector, basically through
> setAs("myClass", "numeric", function(from) from@psi)
Being perhaps overly compulsive about trying to test everything while
documenting behavi
Hi all,
I'd love to get some clarification on what the new internet policy
means for packages like httr:
> Packages which use Internet resources should fail gracefully with an
> informative
> message if the resource is not available (and not give a check warning nor
> error).
It's not clear wh
--- Begin Message ---
Hi All:
Can someone point me to where all the policies such as this one are posted.
This may affect a package I have, and one problem I have is different people
have differing ideas of what defines a "graceful" exit.
Thanks,
Roy
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 8:22 AM, Hadley Wi
Policies at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html
Dirk Eddelbuettel has a CRAN policy watch where you can see the
changes: https://github.com/eddelbuettel/crp
Hadley
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:42 AM Roy Mendelssohn - NOAA Federal
wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> Can someone point me to whe
Hi Kevin,
I think using
> canCoerce(wv, "double") || getRversion() < "3.6.0"
could solve the issue of an inconsistent test result and is descriptive.
Best regards,
Sebastian
Am 06.12.18 um 16:59 schrieb Kevin Coombes:
> Hi,
>
> A package I recently submitted to CRAN includes an S4
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks muchly.
-Roy
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
> Policies at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html
>
> Dirk Eddelbuettel has a CRAN policy watch where you can see the
> changes: https://github.com/eddelbuettel/crp
>
> Hadley
>
Thanks for the suggestion. But it may not be quite expressive enough; I
think I will instead use
> ifelse(getRversion() < "3.6.0",
> ! canCoerce(wv, "double"), # fails in older versions
> canCoerce(wv, "double")) # works in newer versions
That way, when I update the p
Hi all,
I'm attempting to submit an update of our eiPack package to CRAN. When I
submitted it, it passed the Windows check with no problem (other than a
note for a change in maintainer), but it failed almost immediately on the
Debian check. The 00install.out file shows that it failed due to an
i
Please resubmit, a hicc up on the check machine.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 06.12.2018 19:29, Michael Kellermann wrote:
Hi all,
I'm attempting to submit an update of our eiPack package to CRAN. When I
submitted it, it passed the Windows check with no problem (other than a
note for a change in mainta
10 matches
Mail list logo
