Dear Brian,
Dear Uwe,
Thank you for your replies.
I wrote a function that does the same stuff that the suggested package
does.
Now there are no reference to suggested packages.
Best,
Luca
2017-11-08 18:03 GMT+01:00 Uwe Ligges :
> And even this cannot work for strong dependencies, as sztrong de
Note the % may be a comment?
Uwe
On 09.11.2017 06:05, Rolf Turner wrote:
I tried to define a macro to produce today's date (like unto the
"\today" command in LaTeX):
\newcommand{\today}{format(Sys.date(),"%d/%m/%Y")}
I put this into my *.Rd file just before invoking it. (Something like
"
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for me:
\newcommand{\today}{\Sexpr{format(Sys.Date(),"\\\%d/\\
Did you write it from scratch or modify the function from the package
you were referencing? There may be some licensing issues you need to
consider either way.
-Dason
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:53 AM, LUCA BELMONTE wrote:
> Dear Brian,
> Dear Uwe,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> I wrote a fun
Dear list members,
I have three packages on CRAN (asremlPlus, dae and imageData).
The current versions of all three packages can be built and installed using
build of 2017-06-27 r72859 development snapshot of R. I am doing this on a
64-bit laptop and a 64-bit desktop, both running Windows 10.
On 09/11/17 23:06, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Ah, yes. Of course! Duh! (Slaps forehead vigorously!)
Thanks.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
___
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for me:
\newcommand
... Mr. Speaker.
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and error.
This worked for
On 09/11/2017 3:29 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
... Mr. Speaker.
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I re
On 09/11/2017 3:05 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and e
On 09/11/2017 3:05 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 09/11/17 23:40, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 09/11/2017 5:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Note the % may be a comment?
Yes, and the body should be written in Rd markup, not R. Working out
the appropriate number of escapes is painful; I recommend trial and e
On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
[Rolf Turner wrote:]
... when I do the "R CMD
build" thing, when it comes to the "* building the PDF package manual"
step it says "Hmm ... looks like a package" (no shit, Sherlock!) and
emits a huge amount of verbose LaTeX diagnostics.
"Normally" one
A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros in
their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand&type=Code
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> On 10/11/17 12:00, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> [Rolf Turner
On 10/11/17 13:10, François Michonneau wrote:
A github search might be helpful to identify packages that define macros
in their Rd files:
https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=user%3Acran+extension%3Ard+newcommand&type=Code
Thanks. Looking into it.
cheers,
Rolf
--
Technical Editor ANZ
14 matches
Mail list logo
