Re: [R-pkg-devel] \Sexpr{} expressions but no 'build/partial.rdb' file

2017-07-26 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 25/07/2017 4:42 PM, Phil Chalmers wrote: Hi all, First time posting here, so hopefully I'm following the correct etiquette. I recently received the error: "Package has help file(s) containing build-stage \Sexpr{} expressions but no 'build/partial.rdb' file." when submitting a package to CR

Re: [R-pkg-devel] \Sexpr{} expressions but no 'build/partial.rdb' file

2017-07-26 Thread Phil Chalmers
Hi Duncan, I use the standard R CMD build/check --as-cran combo. Here's my output from my Win 10 64-bit box: C:\Users\Phil\Desktop>C:/PROGRA~1/R/R-devel/bin/x64/R CMD build mirtCAT * checking for file 'mirtCAT/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'mirtCAT': * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ...

[R-pkg-devel] spell check in DESCRIPTION

2017-07-26 Thread Simon Wood
I've just had my package (mgcv) bounced because of 3 notes. One of these is complaining about spelling in the DESCRIPTION file. Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: AIC (5:47, 8:75) GAM (5:14) GAMMs (7:20) GAMs (7:14) GCV (5:43, 8:57) REML (5:51, 8:62) UBRE (8:70)

Re: [R-pkg-devel] \Sexpr{} expressions but no 'build/partial.rdb' file

2017-07-26 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 26/07/2017 9:05 AM, Phil Chalmers wrote: Hi Duncan, I use the standard R CMD build/check --as-cran combo. Here's my output from my Win 10 64-bit box: C:\Users\Phil\Desktop>C:/PROGRA~1/R/R-devel/bin/x64/R CMD build mirtCAT * checking for file 'mirtCAT/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * preparing 'mirtCAT'

Re: [R-pkg-devel] spell check in DESCRIPTION

2017-07-26 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 26/07/2017 6:47 AM, Simon Wood wrote: I've just had my package (mgcv) bounced because of 3 notes. One of these is complaining about spelling in the DESCRIPTION file. Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION: AIC (5:47, 8:75) GAM (5:14) GAMMs (7:20) GAMs (7:14) GCV (5:43,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] \Sexpr{} expressions but no 'build/partial.rdb' file

2017-07-26 Thread Phil Chalmers
Yes, I can see the partial.rdb file in the list, also in entry 28. So I believe the problem is on the CRAN build. Phil On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 26/07/2017 9:05 AM, Phil Chalmers wrote: > >> Hi Duncan, >> >> I use the standard R CMD build/check --as-cran combo