Dear all,
my problem is related to the new version of my msBP package but it
actually applies also to the current version uploaded on CRAN
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_msBP.html).
It turns out that the package cannot be compiled under the new R-devel
for windows.
The prob
On 18 April 2016 at 20:48, boB Rudis wrote:
| So, how do we create a solid alternative to CRAN? github drat wld have
| been impossible at my previous gig (for good reasons). Is it time to
| try to get rOpenSci to be a legit CRAN alternative? Add enough process
| around it to support things like th
On 20 April 2016 at 14:28, Antonio Canale wrote:
| Dear all,
|
| my problem is related to the new version of my msBP package but it
| actually applies also to the current version uploaded on CRAN
| (https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_msBP.html).
|
| It turns out that the package
Short answer: use the R macro ISNAN instead. See the Writing R
Extensions manual for details.
Long answer: The default standard for C++ code in R packages is C++98,
which does not define a function "isnan". The C++11 standard introduced
a std::isnan function to C++. What you were previously gettin
I must have missed the bit where anyone mentioned Title Case.
CRAN's rules are definitely solid the vast majority of the time, and I've
opted for a GitHub/devtools based release.
On Wednesday, 20 April 2016, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 18 April 2016 at 20:48, boB Rudis wrote:
> | So, how do
