Hi
I have a package named asm which contains many non-exported functions
which are all starting with "for.eq.".
I also have an S4 class ASM which, when a new object asm of class ASM is
created by using the function newASM() (in the package asm) contains
among other slots one sot with an environme
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Hi
>
> I have a package named asm which contains many non-exported functions
> which are all starting with "for.eq.".
>
> I also have an S4 class ASM which, when a new object asm of class ASM is
> created by using the function newASM() (in the package asm) contains
> among
I would like to implement a package that contains a C function that writes to a
connection.
So the R_ext/Connections.h defines what a connection IS, but not how to get one.
What seems to work is to manually declare
Rconnection getConnection(int n);
In my C file, and while this works, and I can th
On 21/01/2016 11:39 AM, Tom Quarendon wrote:
I would like to implement a package that contains a C function that writes to a
connection.
So the R_ext/Connections.h defines what a connection IS, but not how to get one.
What seems to work is to manually declare
Rconnection getConnection(int n);
I
But that's what I want to do, create the connection in R code and pass it on to
the C function.
My question is, how do I do that?
You appear to need the C getConnection entry point, but it's not part of the
API.
So I'm wondering how I'm supposed to do what you describe.
Sorry if I was unclear.
But that's what I want to do, create the connection in R code and pass it on to
the C function.
My question is, how do I do that?
You appear to need the C getConnection entry point, but it's not part of the
API.
So I'm wondering how I'm supposed to do what you describe.
Sorry if I was unclear.
On 21/01/2016 12:50 PM, Tom Quarendon wrote:
But that's what I want to do, create the connection in R code and pass it on to
the C function.
My question is, how do I do that?
You appear to need the C getConnection entry point, but it's not part of the
API.
So I'm wondering how I'm supposed to d
So upshot is that I can only do why I want by using the function that's not
part of the api, or just not using connections at all and just using normal C
file io, opened from C, and simply pass the file name in instead, rather than a
proper connection object?
> On 21 Jan 2016, at 6:04 pm, Dunca
On 21/01/2016 1:07 PM, Tom Quarendon wrote:
So upshot is that I can only do why I want by using the function that's not
part of the api, or just not using connections at all and just using normal C
file io, opened from C, and simply pass the file name in instead, rather than a
proper connectio
