On 20 August 2023 at 09:22, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| That seems like a bug that should be reported to the Roxygen authors.
Seb did so in June:
https://github.com/r-lib/roxygen2/issues/1491
There has not been a response (but given the CRAN email to many maintainers
it has now been referenced
That seems like a bug that should be reported to the Roxygen authors.
Duncan Murdoch
On 20/08/2023 8:22 a.m., Thomas Rusch wrote:
Dear list,
I'd like to add that it looks like if the package has the same name as a
function in the package, the default aliasing using the "_PACKAGE"
sentinel will
Dear list,
I'd like to add that it looks like if the package has the same name as a
function in the package, the default aliasing using the "_PACKAGE"
sentinel will create two aliases of the same name in different .Rd files
and R CMD check --as-cran will complain,
E.g. using roxygen
#'@keyw
When you get a note from CRAN, remember that it ignores Roxygen comments
completely. It's just looking at the files that Roxygen produces. So
you should look at the .Rd files when you get a complaint about them.
Your previous code would have produced a file named plan.Rd, and that
file didn'
Thanks Dan. Also see:
https://r-pkgs.org/man.html#sec-man-package-doc
My understanding is that literally thousands of packages are broken in the same
way.
-Roy
> On Aug 19, 2023, at 5:54 AM, Daniel Kelley wrote:
>
> # Preamble
>
> This email is to tell other developers what I did to addres